Peter Arkadiev | Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences | Russian State University for the Humanities | Vilnius University
Björn Wiemer | Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
This survey presents a comprehensive account of perfect constructions (based on an anteriority participle
and an often optional auxiliary) in Baltic and Slavic over space and time, including dialects and high-contact minority
varieties. Based on a classification by participle types and their combinations with be- and have-verbs, it
provides a systematic check of renowned functions of perfect grams and evaluates accepted parameters of grammaticalisation.
The most consistent common denominator of perfects in Baltic and Slavic lies in the irrelevance of most such parameters but an
increase in admissible lexical input and a decrease in paradigmatic variability. The two most salient differences between
Slavic and Baltic are (i) the high level of stability of voice orientation of participles in Baltic vs. the diathetic lability
and repeated changes in voice orientation in Slavic, and (ii) stable systems of perfects of likely great antiquity in Baltic
vs. the lack of consistently employed perfect systems in most Slavic languages.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, Ronelle
2006Bosnian,
Croatian, Serbian, a grammar: With sociolinguistic
commentary. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Ambrazas, Vytautas
1990Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskix jazykov [Comparative syntax of participles in Baltic
languages]. Vilnius: Mokslas.
Ambrazas, Vytautas
ed.2006Lithuanian
grammar. 2nd revised
edn. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.
Andersen, Henning
2006Future
and future perfect in the Old Novgorod dialect. Russian
Linguistics 30:1. 71–88.
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2011On the aspectual uses of
the prefix be- in Lithuanian. Baltic
Linguistics 2. 37–78.
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2012Aspektual’naja sistema litovskogo jazyka (s privlečeniem areal’nyx dannyx) [The aspectual system of Lithuanian (with some areal
data)]. In Vladimir A. Plungjan (ed.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki, vyp. 6: Tipologija aspektual’nyx sistem i
kategorij [Studies in the theory of grammar. Vol. 6. Typology of aspectual
systems and categories] (Acta Linguistica
Petropolitana 8(2)), 45–121.
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2015Negative events:
Evidence from Lithuanian. In Peter M. Arkadiev, Ivan S. Kapitonov, Yury A. Lander, Ekaterina V. Rakhilina & Sergey G. Tatevosov (eds.), Donum
semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discipulis amicisque Rossicis
oblata, 7–20. Moscow: LRC.
Arkadiev, Peter M.
2016Vzaimodejstvie perfekta i otricanija v litovskom jazyke: arealʹnaja i tipologičeskaja
perspektiva [Interaction of perfect and negation in Lithuanian:
Areal and typological perspective]. In Timur A. Maisak, Vladimir A. Plungian & Ksenia P. Semenova (eds.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. 7. Tipologija perfekta [Studies in the theory of grammar. 7. The typology of the perfect] (Acta Linguistica
Petropolitana 12(2)), 115–163.
Arkadiev, Peter M.
Forthcoming. Perfect and
negation: Evidence from Lithuanian and sundry
languages. In Karin Mellum Eide & Marc Fryd eds. The
perfect volume Amsterdam John Benjamins
Arkadiev, Peter & Anna Daugavet
2016The
perfect in Lithuanian and Latvian: A contrastive investigation. Paper presented
at
Academia Grammaticorum Salensis Tertia
Decima
, Salos, Lithuania, 1–6 August
2016.
Arumaa, Peeter
1985Urslavische
Grammatik (Einführung in das vergleichende Studium der slavischen Sprachen), vol. 3:
Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Winter.
Barentsen, Adriaan
1986The
use of the particle БЫЛО in modern Russian. In Studies in
Slavic and general lingusitics, vol. 8: Dutch studies in Russian
linguistics, 1–68. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Birzer, Sandra
2010Russkoe deepričastie: Processy grammatikalizacii i leksikalizacii [The Russian gerund: Processes of grammaticalization and
lexicalization]. Munich: Sagner.
Błaszczak, Joanna, Patrycja Jabłońska, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski
2014The
riddle of ‘future tense’ in Polish. In Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds.), Future
times, future
tenses, 165–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Breu, Walter
1994Der
Faktor Sprachkontakt in einer dynamischen Typologie des
Slavischen. In Hans-Robert Mehlig (ed.), Slavistische
Linguistik 1993. Referate des XIX. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Kiel, 21.-23. 9.
1993 (Slavistische Beiträge
319), 41–64. Munich: Sagner.
Breu, Walter
1998Romanisches
Adstrat im Moliseslavischen. Die Welt der
Slaven 43(2). 339–354.
Breza, Edward & Jerzy Treder
1981Gramatyka kaszubska. Zarys popularny [Kashubian grammar. A
popular sketch]. Gdańsk: Zrzeszenie Kaszubsko-Pomorskie.
Browne, Wayles & Theresa Alt
2004A
handbook of Bosnian, Serbian and Croatian. (SEELRC Reference Grammars). [URL]
Budennaya, Evgeniya
2018Èvoljucija subʺektnoj referencii v jazykax baltijskogo areala [The evolution of subject reference in the languages of the Baltic
area]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences dissertation.
Bunčić, Daniel
2015“To
mamy wpajane od dziecka” – a recipient passive in Polish?Zeitschrift für
Slawistik 60(3). 411–431.
Bunina, Irina K.
1959Sistema vremёn
staroslavjanskogo glagola [The tense system of Old Church Slavonic
verb]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Bužarovska, Eleni & Liljana Mitkovska
2010The
grammaticalization of habere-perfect in standard
Macedonian. Balkanistika 23. 43–66.
Dahl, Östen
1985Tense
and aspect
systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dahl, Östen
ed.2000Tense
and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology
20–6). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dahl, Östen & Eva Hedin
2000Current
relevance and event reference. In Dahl (ed.), 385–402.
Damborský, Jiří
1967Participium l-ové ve slovanštině [The l-participle in
Slavic]. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Danylenko, Andrii
2006Slavica
et Islamica. Ukrainian in
context. Munich: Sagner.
Dejanova, Мarija
1970Istorija na složnite minali vremena v bălgarski, sărbohărvatski i slovenski
ezik [The history of compound past tenses in Bulgarian, Serbocroatian and
Slovene]. Sofia: Bălgarska Akademija Nauk.
2013See, now they vanish:
Third-person perfect auxiliaries in Old and Middle Czech. Journal of Slavic
Linguistics 21(1). 77–121.
Diels, Paul
1963Altkirchenslavische
Grammatik: mit einer Auswahl von Texten und einem Wörterbuch, Teil 1: Grammatik. 2nd
edn. Heidelberg: Winter.
Dostál, Antonín
1954Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině [A study of the
Old Church Slavic aspectual
system]. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
Drinka, Bridget
2017Language
contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through
history. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity Press.
Erker, Aksana
2014Sposoby vyraženija prošedšego vremeni v belorusskom smešannom govore na balto-slavjanskom
pogranič’e [Ways of expressing the past tense in Belarusian mixed
subdialects in the Baltic-Slavic contact zone]. In Ilja A. Seržant & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary
approaches to dialectology. The area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian
dialects, 130–149. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Erker, Aksana
2015Strukturnye čerty smešannyx belorusskix govorov na balto-slavjanskom
pogranič’e [Structural properties of the Belarusian mixed subdialects in
the Baltic-Slavic contact
zone]. Leipzig: BiblionMedia.
Feoktistova, A. S.
1961K istorii sostavnogo skazuemogo s prisvjazočnoj čast’ju, vyražennoj pričastiem stradatel’nogo zaloga
prošedšego vremeni (na materiale Novgorodskix pamjatnikov pis’mennosti XII-XVI
vv.) [On the history of the predicate with a copular part expressed
by a passive past participle (on the material of Novgorodian written monuments of the 12th-16th
centuries)]. In Viktor I. Borkovskij & S. I. Katkov (eds.), Issledovanija po leksikologii i grammatike russkogo jazyka [Investigations on the lexicology and grammar of
Russian], 194–208. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.
Ford, Gordon B., Jr.
1969aThe
Old Lithuanian Catechism of Baltramiejus Vilentas (1579). A phonological, morphological and syntactical
investigation. The Hague: Mouton.
Ford, Gordon B., Jr.
1969bOld
Lithuanian texts of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries with a glossary. The Hague: Mouton.
Friedman, Victor A.
1976Dialectal synchrony and
diachronic syntax: The Macedonian perfect. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers
from the parasession on diachronic syntax, April 22,
1976, 96–104. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Friedman, Victor A.
1977The Grammatical categories of
the Macedonian indicative. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Friedman, Victor A.
1986Evidentiality in the
Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality:
The linguistic coding of
epistemology, 168–187. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Friedman, Victor A.
2000Confirmative/nonconfirmative
in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian with additional observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian, and
Lak. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials
in Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring
languages, 329–366. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Friedman, Victor A.
2001Hunting the elusive
evidential: The third-person auxiliary as a boojum in
Bulgarian. In Victor A. Friedman & Donald L. Dyer (eds.), Of
all the Slavs my favorites: In honor of Howard I. Aronson on the occasion of his 66th
birthday (Indiana Slavic Studies
12), 203–230. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
2016Passive
constructions in Lithuanian. Selected works by Emma Geniušienė ed.
by Anna Kibort & Nijolė Maskaliūnienė, trans.
by Artūras Ratkus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1976Văznikvane na novi složni glagolni formi săs spomagatelen glagol
‘imam’ [The rise of new compound forms with the auxiliary verb
‘imam’ (‘have’)]. In Petăr Pašov & Ruselina Nicolova (eds.), Pomagalo po bălgarska morfologija: Glagol [Textbook of
Bulgarian morphology: The
verb]. Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo, 294–311. [Abridged and
reprinted from Izvestija na Instituta po bălgarski
ezik 5 (1957) 31–59.]
Giger, Markus
2000Syntaktické modelovanie slovenských posesívnych rezultatívnych konštrukcií v rámci dependenčnej
gramatiky [Syntactic modelling of Slovak possessive resultative
constructions in a dependency framework]. Jazykovedný
časopis 51(1). 17–26.
Giger, Markus
2003Resultativkonstruktionen
im modernen Tschechischen (unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der übrigen slavischen
Sprachen) (Slavica Helvetica
69). Bern: Lang.
Giger, Markus
2016Kongruenzbrüche
in slovakischen possessiven Resultativa (Evidenz aus dem slovakischen
Nationalkorpus). Jazykovedný
časopis 67(3). 283–294.
Gołąb, Zbigniew
1984The
Aromanian dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia, SFR
Yugoslavia. Skopje: MANU.
Grek-Pabisowa, Iryda & Irena Maryniakowa
1999Współczesne gwary polskie na dawnych Kresach północnowschodnich (eksploracja terenowa i rozpisanie
tekstów przy udziale Małgorzaty Ostrówki i Anny Zielińskiej) [Contemporary
Polish dialects in the former Polish northeastern peripheral dialects (fieldwork and transcription of records with
cooperation by Małgorzata Ostrówka and Anna
Zielińska)]. Warsaw: SOW.
Guentchéva, Zlatka
1996Le
médiatif en bulgare. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), L’énonciation
médiatisée, 47–70. Louvain: Peeters.
Harris, Martin
1982The
‘past simple’ and the ‘present perfect’ in Romance. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies
in the Romance
verb, 42–79. London: Croom Helm.
Haspelmath, Martin
1994Passive
participles across languages. In Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Voice:
Form and function (Typological Studies in Language
27), 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Holvoet, Axel
2001Studies
in the Latvian verb. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Roumyana Izvorski
2001Observations
about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken
Hale: A life in language (Current Studies in Linguistics
36), 189–238. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Istrina, Evgenija S.
1923Sintaksičeskie javlenija Sinodalʹnogo spiska I Novgorodskoj letopisi [Syntactic features of the Novgorod Primary Chronicle according to the Synodal
manuscript]. Izvestija Otdelenija Russkogo Jazyka i
Slovesnosti 24(2). 1–172; 26. 207–239.
Kaukienė, Audronė
2004Prūsų kalbos tyrinėjimai [Studies in the Prussian
language]. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos Universitetas.
Kibrik, Andrej A.
2013Peculiarities and
origins of the Russian referential system. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages
across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna
Siewierska, 227–263. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Klenin, Emily
1993The
perfect tense in the Laurentian Manuscript of 1377. In Robert A. Maguire & Alan Timberlake (eds.), American
contributions to the eleventh international congress of Slavists: Bratislava, August–September 1993; Literature,
Linguistics, Poetics, 330–343. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
Knoll, Vladislav
2012Kašubština v jazykovém kontaktu [Kashubian in language
contact]. Prague: Filozofická Fak. Univ. Karlovy.
Koneski, Blaže
1965Istorija na makedonskiot jazik [The history of
Macedonian]. Skopje: Kočo Racin.
Kukuškina, Ol’ga V. & Marija N. Ševeleva
1991O formirovanii sovremennoj kategorii glagolʹnogo vida [On the formation of modern category of verbal aspect]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Ser. 9.
Filologija 6. 38–49.
Kuteva, Tania
2001Auxiliation:
An enquiry into the nature of
grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuz’mina, Irina B.
1971Predikativnoe
upotreblenie pričastnyx form [Predicative use of
participles]. In Irina B. Kuz’mina & Elena V. Nemčenko, Sintaksis pričastnyx form v russkix govorax [The syntax of participles in
Russian
dialects], 16–223. Moscow: Nauka.
Kuz’mina, Irina B.
1993Sintaksis russkix
govorov v lingvogeografičeskom aspekte [The syntax of Russian dialects
from the perspective of linguistic
geography]. Moscow: Nauka.
Łaziński, Marek
2001Was
für ein Perfekt gibt es im modernen Polnisch? Bemerkungen zum Artikel “Gibt es ein Perfekt im modernen Polnisch?” von
H. Weydt und A. Kazimierczak (Linguistik online 4, 3/99). Linguistik
online 8(1–01).
Lehmann, Christian
2015
[1982]Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd
edn. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Lépissier, Jacques
1960Le
futur antérieur en viex slave. Revue des études
slaves 37(1). 89–100.
Lindstedt, Jouko
2000The
perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Dahl (ed.), 365–384.
Lötzsch, Ronald
1967Das
Tempussystem des Slovinzischen im Vergleich zu dem des Sorbischen und
Deutschen. Lětopis, Rjad
A, 14(1). 23–46.
Lunt, Horace G.
2001Old Church Slavonic
grammar. 7th revised
edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mackevič, Juzefa F. & Elena Grinaveckienė
1993Dzeeprysloŭi na -(ŭ)šy ŭ belaruskix narodnyx
gavorkax [Gerunds in -(ŭ)šy in Belarusian
dialects]. Lietuvių kalbotyros
klausimai 30. 105–108.
MacRobert, Catherine Mary
2013The competing use of
perfect and aorist tenses in Old Church
Slavonic. Slavia 82(4). 387–407.
Makarcev, Maksim M.
2014Ėvidencial’nost’
v prostranstve balkanskogo teksta [Evidentiality in the space of the
Balkan
text]. Moscow: Nestor-Istorija.
Makarova, Аnastasija L.
2016O formax i funkcijax
perfekta v zapadnomakedonskix dialektax [On the forms and functions
of the perfect in the western dialects of Macedonian]. In Timur A. Majsak, Vladimir A. Plungjan & Ksenija P. Semënova (eds.), Issledovanija po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 7. Tipologija perfekta [Studies in the Theory of Grammar. Vol. 7. Typology of the Perfect] (Acta
Linguistica Petropolitana
12(2)), 217–234.
Makarova, Аnastasija L.
2017On the Macedonian
Perfect(s) in the Balkan Context. Zeitschrift für
Slawistik 62(3). 387–403.
Maslov, Jurij S.
1981Grammatika
bolgarskogo jazyka [A grammar of
Bulgarian]. Moscow: Vysšaja škola.
Mathiassen, Terje
1996Tense,
mood and aspect in Lithuanian and Latvian. Meddelelser av Slavisk-baltisk avdeling, Universitetet i Oslo, No. 75.
2016Das
Perfekt im Serbischen zwischen slavischer und balkanslavischer
Entwicklung. In Alena Bazhutkina & Barbara Sonnenhauser (eds.), Linguistische
Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXII. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in München. 12. bis 14. September
2013 (Specimina Philologiae Slavicae
187), 83–110. Munich: Sagner.
Mendoza, Imke
2013Verhinderte
Grammatikalisierung? Zur Diachronie von Resultativkonstruktionen mit mieć ‘habenʼ im
Polnischen. Wiener Slawistischer
Almanach 72. 77–102.
Mendoza, Imke
2018Possessive
resultative constructions in Old and Middle Polish. In Jasmina Grković-Major, Björn Hansen & Barbara Sonnenhauser (eds.), Diachronic
Slavonic syntax: The interplay between internal development, language contact and metalinguistic
factors, 161–186. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Mitkovska, Liljana & Eleni Bužarovska
2011aZa upotrebata na ima-perfektot vo makedonskiot standarden jazik vo relacija so
konkurentnite glagolski formi [On the use of the
have-perfect in the Macedonian standard languages in relation to competing verbal
forms]. In Zuzana Topolinjska (ed.), Perifrastičnite konstrukcii so ‘ESSE’ i ‘HABERE’ vo slovenskite i balkanskite
jazici [Periphrastic constructions with ESSE and HABERE verbs in Slavic
and Balkan
languages], 55–82. Skopje: Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite.
Mitkovska, Liljana & Eleni Bužarovska
2011bZa ima perfektot vo makedonskiot standarden jazik [On the have-perfect in the Macedonian standard
language]. Prilozi 35(1). 45–71.
Mološnaja, Tatiana N.
1996Pljuskvamperfekt v sisteme grammatičeskix form glagola v sovremennyx slavjanskix
jazykax [The pluperfect in the verbal system of the modern Slavic
languages]. In Tatʹjana M. Nikolaeva (ed.), Rusistika. Slavistika. Indoevropeistika. Sbornik k 60-letiju Andreja Anatol’eviča
Zaliznjaka [Russian, Slavic, and Indo-European Studies. A Festschrift for
Andrej Zaliznjak on the occasion of his 60th
birthday], 564–573. Moscow: Indrik.
Nau, Nicole
2005Perfekts un saliktā tagadne latviešu valodā [Perfect
and compound present in Latvian]. Baltu
filoloģija 14(2). 137–154.
Nau, Nicole
2019Experiential
and possessive passive perfect in Latvian. Paper presented at
the international workshop “New Explorations into the Baltic Verb”, Vilnius
University, September 23–24, 2019.
1913Nowy czas przeszły złożony [A new compound past
tense]. Język
Polski 1(4). 102–106.
Nomachi, Motoki
2006Ot posessivnosti k aspektual’nosti: distribucija glagolov imati i biti
v slovenskom jazyke (v tipologičeskom osveščenii) [From possession
to aspectuality: the distribution of imati ‘have’ and biti ‘be’ in Slovene (in a
typological perspective)]. Slavia
Meridionalis 6. 65–90.
Nomachi, Motoki
2012On
the so-called possessive perfect in standard Serbian language (with a glance at other Slavic
languages). Leptir Mašna: The literary journal of Balkan
Studies 9(1). 89–97.
Pen’kova, Jana A.
2014K voprosu
o semantike tak nazyvaemogo buduščego složnogo v drevnerusskom jazyke (na materiale “Žitija Andreja
Jurodivogo”) [On the semantics of the so-called compound past in Old
Russian (on the data of The Life of Andrew of Constantinople)]. Russkij jazyk v naučnom
osveščenii 27(1). 150–184.
Pen’kova, Jana A.
2016Semantika slavjanskogo
vtorogo buduščego i nekotorye tipologičeskie paralleli [The
semantics of the Slavic second future and some typological
parallels]. In Aleksandr M. Moldovan (ed.), Materialy meždunarodnoj naučnoj konferencii “Grammatičeskie processy i sistemy v sinxronii i
diaxronii” [Proceedings of the International Conference “Grammatical
processes in synchrony and diachrony”] (Trudy Instituta russkogo âzyka im. V.V.
Vinogradova RAN 10), 475–488.
Petruxin, Pavel V.
2004Perfekt i
pljuskvamperfekt v novgorodskoj pervoj letopisi po sinodalʹnomu spisku [Perfect and pluperfect in the Novgorod primary chronicle according to the Synodal
manuscript]. Russian
Linguistics 28. 73–107.
Piskorz, Jadwiga
2012Die
Grammatikalisierung eines neuen Perfekts im Polnischen: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungslogik des
Perfekts. Munich: Sagner.
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Anna Ju. Urmančieva
2015aThe
perfect in Old Church Slavonic: A corpus-based study in grammatical
semantics. Presentation from
Slavic corpus
linguistics: The historical
dimension
, Tromsø, April 21–22,
2015.
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Anna Ju. Urmančieva
2015bOld
Church Slavonic perfect: Semantic differences underlying formal variation? Handout of
the talk at the international workshop Perfect: Variation. Synchrony, diachrony,
acquisition
, Trondheim, November 5–7,
2015.
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Anna Ju. Urmančieva
2016Semantika staroslavjanskix form perfekta i pljuskvamperfekta skvozʹ prizmu ix konstrukcionnyx
osobennostej [The semantics of the Old Church Slavonic perfect and
pluperfect seen through their constructional properties]. Abstract from the conference
“Corpus approaches to the Balkan languages and dialects”, Institute of Linguistic
Studies, Saint-Petersburg, December
2016. [URL]
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Anna Ju. Urmančieva
2017Perfekt v staroslavjanskom: byl li on rezul’tativnym? [The perfect in Old Church Slavonic: was it
resultative?] Slověne 6(2). 13–56.
Plungian, Vladimir A. & Anna Ju. Urmančieva
2018K tipologii nerezul’tativnogo perfekta (na materiale staroslavjanskogo
jazyka) [Towards a typology of non-resultative perfect (on the basis
of Old Church Slavonic)]. Slavistična
Revija 66(4). 421–440.
Plungian, Vladimir & Johan van der Auwera
2006Towards
a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und
Universalienforschung 59(4). 317–349.
Požarickaja, Sof’ja K.
1991O
semantike nekotoryx form prošedšego vremeni glagola v severnorusskom narečii [On the semantics of some past tense verbal forms in the North Russian
dialects]. Revue des études
slaves 63(4). 787–799.
Požarickaja, Sof’ja K.
2014аO
lingvogeografičeskix parametrax funkcionirovanija pričastnyx form v russkix
govorax [On the linguogeographic aspects of the usage of participial
forms in Russian dialects]. In Ilja A. Seržant & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary
approaches to dialectology. The area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian
dialects, 109–129. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Požarickaja, Sof’ja K.
2014bKonstrukcii s glagolom byt’ (byl, byla, bylo, byli) v odnom severnorusskom govore:
k voprosu o pljuskvamperfekte [Constructions with the verb ‘be’ in
one North Russian variety: the question of the
pluperfect]. In Ilja A. Seržant & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary
approaches to dialectology. The area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian
dialects, 216–244. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Sakurai, Eiko
2016The
perfect in Lithuanian: An empirical study. In Andra Kalnača, Ilze Lokmane & Daiki Horiguči (eds.), Valoda: Nozīme un forma. 7. Gramatika un saziņa [Language:
Meaning and form. 7. Grammar and
communication], 189–208. Riga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Scholze, Lenka
2008Das
grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache im Sprachkontakt: mit Grammatiktafeln im
Anhang. Bautzen: Domowina.
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.
1959A semantic analysis of the Old
Russian finite preterite system (Slavistische drukken en herdrukken
7). ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.
Servaitė, Laimutė
1988Subjektinis rezultatyvas lietuvių kalboje (Perfekto formos su rezultatinės būsenos
reikšme) [Subjective resultative in Lithuanian (Perfect forms
denoting resulting
state)]. Kalbotyra 39(1). 81–89.
Šewc-Schuster, Hinc
1984Gramatika hornjo-serbskeje rěče. 1. zwjazk. Fonologija, fonetika a
morfologija [A grammar of Upper Sorbian. Vol. 1. Phonology, phonetics and
morphology]. Budyšin: Domowina.
Sičinava, Dmitrij
2013Tipologija pljuskvamperfekta. Slavjanskij pljuskvamperfekt [The typology of the pluperfect. The Slavic
pluperfect]. Moscow: AST-Press.
Silina, Vera B.
1995Vido-vremennye otnošenija [Temporal-aspectual
relations]. In Valerij V. Ivanov (ed.), Drevnerusskaja grammatika XII–XIII vekov [The grammar of Old
Russian of the 12–13
centuries], 374–464. Moscow: Nauka.
Sližienė, Nijole
1995The
tense system of Lithuanian. In Rolf Thieroff (ed.), The
tense systems in European
languages, vol. 2, 215–232. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sobolev, Andrej N.
1998O
predikativnom upotreblenii pričastij v russkix dialektax [On the
predicative use of participles in Russian dialects]. Voprosy
jazykoznanija 5. 74–89.
Sonnenhauser, Barbara
2011‘Renarrativʼ
und indirekte Rede im Bulgarischen. Die Welt der
Slaven 66. 131–154.
2000The simple
and compound past in Romance languages. In Dahl (ed.), 403–440.
Štícha, František
1986Systémový a funkční status konstrukcí s n/t-ovými participii v současné
češtině [The systematic and functional status of constructions with
n/t-participles in contemporary Czech]. Slovo a
slovesnost 47(3). 177–185.
Swan, Oscar E.
2002A grammar of contemporary
Polish. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.
Taube, Moshe
1980On
the penetration of the perfect into the Russian narrative system. Russian
Linguistics 5(2). 121–131.
Thieroff, Rolf
2000On
the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in
Europe. In Dahl (ed.), 265–305.
Thomas, Werner
1952Die
tocharischen Verbaladjektive auf -l. Eine syntaktische Untersuchung (Deutsche Akademie der
Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Institut für Orientforschung
9). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Topolinjska, Zuzana. [Topolińska, Zuzanna
] 1983Za dvojnoto poteklo na konstrukciite so ima vo makedonskiot literaturen
jazik [About the double source of constructions with
ima ‘have’ in Standard Macedonian]. II Naučna
diskusija (Seminar za makedonski jazik) [2nd scientific discussion
(Seminar on
Macedonian)], 25–33. Skopje: Univerzitet Sv. Kiril i Metodi.
Topolińska, Zuzanna [Topolinjska, Zuzana
] 1995Makedonskite dialekti vo egejska Makedonija, kn. 1: Sintaksa (del I) [Macedonian dialects in Aegean Macedonia. Vol. 1.
Syntax]. Skopje: Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite.
Townsend, Charles E. & Laura A. Janda
2003Gemeinslavisch
und Slavisch im Vergleich: Einführung in die Entwicklung von Phonologie und
Flexion. Munich: Sagner.
1968Die
Perfektperiphrase im Altkirchenslavischen und Altarmenischen. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden
Syntax. Indogermanische
Forschungen 73. 87–109.
Trost, Klaus
1972Perfekt
und Konditional im
Altkirchenslavischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Trubinskij, Valentin I.
1984Očerki russkogo
dialektnogo sintaksisa [Studies in the syntax of Russian
dialects]. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta.
Vaillant, André
1966Grammaire
comparée des langues slaves. Tome III. Le
verbe. Paris: Klincksieck.
Večerka, Radoslav
1993Altkirchenslavische
(altbulgarische) Syntax, II. Die innere
Satzstruktur. Freiburg: Weiher.
Večerka, Radoslav
1996Altkirchenslavische
(altbulgarische) Syntax, III. Die Satztypen: der einfache
Satz. Freiburg: Weiher.
Velkovska, Snežana
1998Izrazuvanje na rezultativnosta vo makedonskiot standarden jazik [The expression of resultativity in Standard
Macedonian]. Skopje: Institut za makedonski jazik “Krste Misirikov”.
Weiss, Daniel
1977Syntax
und Semantik polnischer Partizipialkonstruktionen: im Rahmen einer generativ-transformationellen
Sprachbeschreibung. Bern: Lang.
Whaley, Marika Lynn
2000The evolution of the
Slavic ‘be(come)’-type compound future. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University dissertation.
Wiemer, Björn
2004The
evolution of passives as grammatical constructions in Northern Slavic and Baltic
languages. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What
makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its
components, 271–331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wiemer, Björn
2006aGrammatical
evidentiality in Lithuanian (a typological
assessment). Baltistica 41(1). 33–49.
2011Grammaticalization
in Slavic languages. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
grammaticalization, 740–753. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wiemer, Björn
2012The
Lithuanian have-resultative – a typological curiosum?Lingua
Posnansiensis 54(2). 69–81.
Wiemer, Björn
2014Umbau
des Partizipialsystems. In: †Karl Gutschmidt, Sebastian Kempgen, Tilman Berger & Peter Kosta (eds.), Slavische
Sprachen: Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer
Erforschung (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft
32:2), 1625–1652. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Wiemer, Björn
2017Slavic
resultatives and their extensions: Integration into the aspect system and the role of
telicity. Slavia 86(2–3). 124–168.
Wiemer, Björn
Forthcoming. On
the rise, establishment and continued development of subject impersonals in Polish, East Slavic and
Baltic. In Seppo Kittilä & Leonid Kulikov eds. Diachronic
typology of voice and valency-changing
categories Amsterdam John Benjamins
Wiemer, Björn & Markus Giger
2005Resultativa
in den nordslavischen und baltischen Sprachen: Bestandsaufnahme unter arealen und grammatikalisierungstheoretischen
Gesichtspunkten. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
Wiemer, Björn & Björn Hansen
2012Assessing
the range of contact-induced grammaticalization in
Slavonic. In Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli & Björn Hansen (eds.), Grammatical
replication and borrowability in language
contact, 67–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wiemer, Björn & Ilja A. Seržant
2017Diachrony
and typology of Slavic aspect: What does morphology tell
us? In Walter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Unity
and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios (Studies in Diversity Linguistics
16), 239–307. Berlin: Language Science Press.
PROIEL – The Treebank of Ancient Indo-European Languages
, [URL] (Dag T. T. Haug and Marius L. Jøhndal2008 ‘Creating
a Parallel Treebank of the Old Indo-European Bible
Translations’. In Caroline Sporleder and Kiril Ribarov (eds.). Proceedings
of the Second Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (LaTeCH 2008)
(2008), pp. 27–34).
, [URL] (Hanne Martine Eckhoff and Aleksandrs Berdicevskis2015 ‘Linguistics
vs. digital editions: The Tromsø Old Russian and OCS Treebank’. Scripta &
e-Scripta 14–15, pp. 9–25).
WLČ
1845 – Wýbor z literatury
české. Díl prwní. Od nejstarších časůw až do počátku XV
století. Praha: W kommissí u Kronbergra i Řiwnáče 1845.
2023. Македонский esse-перфект: лексическая дистрибуция и контекстные ограничения. In L’aspettualità nel contatto linguistico: lingue slave e oltre [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 53], ► pp. 89 ff.
Grkovic-Mejdzor, Jasmina
2022. On the origin of the optative use of the verbal adjective in -l. Juznoslovenski filolog 78:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Wiemer, Björn
2023. Zu slavisch-baltischen Konvergenzen (und ihr Fehlen) im Aspekt-Tempus-Bereich. In L’aspettualità nel contatto linguistico: lingue slave e oltre [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 53], ► pp. 183 ff.
Wiemer, Björn
2024. Ein Exot mit hegemonialen Ansprüchen. In Die Ukraine als Objekt russischer Großmachtansprüche [Arbeiten und Texte zur Slavistik, 109], ► pp. 95 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.