Chapter published in:
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 246277
References

References

Amano, Kyoko
2009Maytrāyaṇī Saṃhitā I-II. Übersetzung der Prosapartien mit Kommentar zur Lexik und Syntax der älteren vedischen Prosa (Münchener Forschungen zur historischen Sprachwissenschaft 9). Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Dipak
1997The Paippalāda-Saṃhitā of the Atharvaveda (Bibliotheca Indica 319). Calcutta: The Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Botne, Robert & Tiffany L. Kershner
2008Tense and cognitive space: On the organization of tense/aspect systems in Bantu languages and beyond. Cognitive Linguistics 19. 145–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cardona, George
2002The Old Indo-Aryan tense system. Journal of the American Oriental Society 122 (Indic and Iranian Studies in Honor of Stanley Insler on His Sixty-Fifth Birthday), 235–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2010Time, tense and aspect in Early Vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 5). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011aTense and aspect in Indo-Iranian Part 1: The present and aorist. Language and Linguistics Compass 5. 265–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bTense and aspect in Indo-Iranian Part 2: The perfect, futurate, participial and periphrastic categories. Language and Linguistics Compass 5. 282–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Evidence for evidentiality in Late Vedic. Klein & Yoshida (eds.), 9–22.Google Scholar
2013Typological change in Vedic: The development of the aorist from a perfective past to an immediate past. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic and typological perspectives on verbs (Studies in Language Companion Series 134), 261–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The development of the Vedic perfect: From anterior present to inferential past. In Jared Klein & Elizabeth Tucker (eds.), Vedic and Sanskrit historical linguistics: Papers of the 13th World Sanskrit Conference III, 179–242. New Delhi: Motilal Banarshidass.Google Scholar
2015Toward a formal model of semantic change: A neo-Reichenbachian approach to the development of the Vedic past tense system. Lingua Posnaniensis 57. 41–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Tense and temporal remoteness in the Old Indo-Aryan verbal system: A multidimensional timeline approach. In Vit Bubenik, Bridget Drinka, John Hewson & Ondřej Sefčik (eds.), Exploring universals of tense and aspect, 129–153. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1897Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. II. Strassburg: Trübner. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Giovine, Paolo
1990Studio sul perfetto indoeuropeo I: La funzione originaria del perfetto studiata nella documentazione delle lingue storiche (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 26). Roma: Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar
1996aStudio sul perfetto indoeuropeo II: La posizione del perfetto all’interno del sistema verbale indoeuropeo (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 40). Roma: Il Calamo/Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar
1996bStudio sul perfetto indoeuropeo III: Indici (Biblioteca di ricerche linguistiche e filologiche 41). Roma: Il Calamo/Dipartimento di studi glottoantropologici dell’Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.Google Scholar
Eberle, Kurt & Walter Kasper
1994French past tenses and temporal structure. In Rolf Thieroff & Joachim Ballweg (eds.), Tense systems in European languages (Linguistische Arbeiten 308), 149–172. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Arlo
2009The Paippalādasaṃhitā of the Atharvaveda: Kāṇḍas 6 & 7 (Groningen Oriental Studies 22). Groningen: Forsten.Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey L. J.
2008Alignment change in Iranian languages: A construction grammar approach (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 37). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl & Bernhard Forssman
2004Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. 2nd revised and extended edition. (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 115). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Humbach, Helmut, Josef Elfenbein and Prods O. Skjærvø
1991The Gāthās of Zarathushtra and the other Old Avestan texts I: Introduction – Text and translation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie W. & Joel P. Brereton
2014The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India. Translated by Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H.
1978Stative and middle in Indo-European (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 23). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle
1993From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophie 42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Keith, Arthur B.
1920Rigveda Brahmanas: The Aitareya and Kauṣītaki Brāhmaṇas of the Rigveda (Harvard Oriental Series 25). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Roland G.
1953Old Persian: Grammar, texts, lexicon (American Oriental Series 33). New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1998Aspect and event structure in Vedic. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 1998 29–62.Google Scholar
2002Event structure and the perfect. In David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martínez, Brady Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.) The construction of meaning, 113–136. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared S.
1978The particle u in the Rigveda: A synchronic and diachronic study (Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung. Ergänzungsheft 27). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
1985Toward a discourse grammar of the Rigveda. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared S. & Kazuhiko Yoshida
(eds.) 2012Indic across the millennia. From the Rigveda to Modern Indo-Aryan. Proceedings of the linguistics section. 14th World Sanskrit Conference, Kyoto, Japan, September 1–5 2009. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Masato
2012Information structure and the particles vái and evá in Vedic prose. In Klein & Yoshida (eds.), 77–92.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2013Language vs. grammatical tradition in Ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Evidence from the history of late Sanskrit passives and pseudo-passives. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 59–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, Martin J.
2000Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen: Eine Untersuchung der Form und Funktion einer ererbten Kategorie des Verbums und ihrer Weiterentwicklung in den altindoiranischen Sprachen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Olivelle, Patrick
1996Upaniṣads: A new translation by Patrick Olivelle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skjærvø, Prods O.
2009Old Iranian. In Gernot Windfuhr (ed.), The Iranian languages, 43–195. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Witzel, Michael
1989Tracing the Vedic dialects. In Colette Caillat (ed.), Dialectes dans les littératures indo-aryennes: Actes du colloque international, org. par l’UA 1058, Paris (Fondation Hugot), 16–18 sept. 1986 (Publications de l’institut de civilisation indienne 55), 97–264. Paris: Boccard.Google Scholar
1995Early Indian history: Linguistic and textual parameters. In George Erdosy (ed.), Language, material culture and ethnicity. The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia (Indian Philology and South Asian Studies 1), 85–125. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar