Chapter published in:
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 549590
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2016The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 62). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N.
2011Late Latin. In Clackson (ed.), 257–283.Google Scholar
Allen, Joseph H. & James B. Greenough
1887A Latin grammar founded on comparative grammar. Boston, MA: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Ayer, Meagan
2014Allen and Greenough’s new Latin grammar for schools and colleges. Carlisle, PA: Dickinson College Commentaries. http://​dcc​.dickinson​.edu​/grammar​/latin​/credits​-and​-reuse. (October 10 2018.)
Badian, Ernst
1999Licinius Lucullus (2), Lucius. In Simon Hornblower & Antony Spawforth (eds.), The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baldi, Phillip
1976Remarks on the Latin R-form verbs. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 90. 222–257.Google Scholar
Bary, Corien
2009Aspect in Ancient Greek: A semantic analysis of the aorist and imperfective. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen dissertation. https://​repository​.ubn​.ru​.nl​/bitstream​/handle​/2066​/74432​/74432​.pdf
2012Tense in Ancient Greek Reports. Journal of Greek Linguistics 12:1. 29–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James
2011aClassical Latin. Clackson (ed.), 236–256.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2011bA companion to the Latin language. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James & Geoffrey Horrocks
2007The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, Albert Curtis
ed. 1908M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes. Vol. 1: Pro Sex. Roscio. De Imperio Cn. Pompei. Pro Cluentio. In Catilinam. Pro Murena. Pro Caelio. Oxford: Clarendon. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0010
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbell, Anthony
2013Cicero and the intellectual milieu of the late Republic. In Catherine Steel (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Cicero, 9–24. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crellin, Robert
2012The Greek Perfect Active System: 200 BC – AD 150. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
2016The syntax and semantics of the perfect active in literary Koine Greek (Publications of the Philological Society 113). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens
2013Semantics for Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1991Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ, reprinted with a new preface (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 7). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget
2009The *-to- / -no- construction of Indo-European: Verbal adjective or past passive participle? In Vít Bubeník, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305), 141–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. J.
1917The Gallic War (Loeb Classical Library 72). Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2000Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31:2. 185–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, H. Rushton
1926Satires. Epistles. The Art of Poetry (Loeb Classical Library 194). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Crossref; CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, William Armistead
1923De Senectute. De Amicitia. De Divinatione (Loeb Classical Library 154). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a2007​.01​.0042
Foster, Benjamin O.
1919Livy. History of Rome. Books 1–2 (Loeb Classical Library 114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0199%3abook%3d1
1924Livy. History of Rome. Books 5–7 (Loeb Classical Library 172). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Liv​.+5+1​&fromdoc​=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999​.02​.0202
1926Livy. History of Rome. Books 8–10 (Loeb Classical Library 191). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Liv​.+8+1​&fromdoc​=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999​.02​.0156
Freese, John H.
1930Pro Quinctio. Pro Roscio Amerino. Pro Roscio Comoedo. On the Agrarian Law (Loeb Classical Library 240). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts, vol. 3 (Syntax and Semantics 3), 41–58. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, James B.
ed. 1900Bucolics, Aeneid, and Georgics of Vergil. Boston: Ginn & Co. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0055
Greenough, James B., G. L. Kittredge, A. A. Howard & Benjamin L. D’Ooge
eds. 1903Allen & Greenough’s new Latin grammar for schools and colleges. Boston, MA: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura
2016Reconstructing Proto-Indo-European deponents. Indo-European Linguistics 4. 98–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haines, Charles R.
1919Correspondence, Volume I (Loeb Classical Library 112). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, William Gardner
1886The sequence of tenses in Latin: First paper. The American Journal of Philology 7:4. 446–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin
1970The verbal systems of Latin and French. Transactions of the Philological Society 69. 62–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haverling, Gerd V. M.
2010Actionality, tense and viewpoint. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 2: Constituent syntax: Adverbial phrases, adverbs, mood, tense (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 180.2), 277–523. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Heseltine, Michael & William H. D. Rouse
1913Petronius: Satyricon. Seneca: Apocolocyntosis rev. by Eric H. Warmington (Loeb Classical Library 15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2013Converb and aspect-marking polysemy in Nar. In Elena Mihas, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Responses to language endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan. New directions in language documentation and language revitalization, 97–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Johann B. & Anton Szantyr
1972Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. Rice
(ed.) 1914C. Iuli commentarii rerum in Gallia gestarum VII. [Julius Caesar’s VII Commentaries on the Gallic Wars]. Oxford: Clarendon. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0002
(ed.) 1916Caesar in Britain: C. Iuli Caesaris de bello gallico commentarii quartus (xx-xxxviii) et quintus. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey & Melita Stavrou
2007Grammaticalized aspect and spatio-temporal culmination. Lingua 117:4. 605–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, Nicholas
2008Virgil, Aeneid 2: A commentary (Mnemosyne Supplements 299). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Benjamin H. & James Mountford
1962The revised Latin primer. New edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony
1963Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.Google Scholar
Kiessling, Adolf Gottlieb
(ed.) 1872Annaei Senecae oratorum et rhetorum sententiae divisiones colores. Leipzig: Teubner. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a2008​.01​.0562
Kiparsky, Paul
2002Event structure and the perfect. In David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martínez, Brady Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.), The Construction of Meaning, 113–136. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1992The present perfect puzzle. Language 68:3. 525–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2010The lexical semantics of derived statives. Linguistics and Philosophy 33. 285–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1989Nominal Reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas, Semantics and contextual expression (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 11), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters (CSLI Lecture Notes 24), 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications & Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Joachim Martin
2013Zur Verwendung des Perfektfuturs im Altlatein. Glotta 89. 130–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred & Susan Rothstein
2012The felicity of aspectual for-phrases – Part 1: Homogeneity. Linguistics and language compass 6. 85–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayhoff, Karl Friedrich Theodor
McDevitte, W. A. & W. S. Bohn
Meillet, Antoine
1933Esquisse d’une histoire de la langue latine. 3rd revised and expanded edn. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Meiser, Gerhard
1993Uritalische Modussyntax: zur Genese des Konjunktiv Imperfekt. In Helmut Rix (ed.), Oskisch-Umbrisch: Texte und Grammatik. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft und der Società Italiana di Glottologia vom 25. bis 28. September 1991 in Freiburg, 167–195. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
1998Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
2003Veni vidi vici: Die Vorgeschichte des lateinischen Perfektsystems (Zetemata 113). Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
de Melo, Wolfgang David Cirilo
2007The early Latin verb system: Archaic forms in Plautus, Terence, and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penney, John
2011Archaic and Old Latin. In Clackson (ed.), 220–235.Google Scholar
Peterson, William
ed. 1917M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes. Vol 3: Divinatio in Q. Caecilium. In C. Verrem. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0012%3atext%3dVer
Pinkster, Harm
1983Tempus, Aspekt and Aktionsart in Latin (Recent trends 1961–1981). In Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II: Principat, vol. 29.1: Sprache und Literatur, 270–319. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015The Oxford Latin syntax 1: The simple clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, Michel
1978Le parfait de l’indicatif: un passé accompli ou passé accompli pur et simple? Revue des Études Latines 56. 369–379.Google Scholar
1980Le parfait de l’indicatif latin : un passé accompli, ou un accompli pur et simple? In Serbat (ed.) 1980b, 87–96.Google Scholar
du Pontet, René
ed. 1901C. Iuli Caesaris Commentariorum. Pars posterior qua continentur: Libri III De bello civili, cum libris incertorum auctorum De bello Alexandrino Africo Hispaniensi. Oxford: Clarendon. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0075
Postgate, John P.
1913Tibullus. Catullus. Tibullus. Pervigillium Veneris. (Loeb Classical Library 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Purser, Louis Claude
ed. 1903M. Tulli Ciceronis epistulae. Vol. 2, Epistulae ad Atticum. Oxford: Clarendon. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0008
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona
1997Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
1998Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and syntactic constraints (CSLI Lecture Notes 83), 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Riley, Henry Thomas
Rix, Helmut
1992Zur Entstehung des lateinischen Perfektparadigmas. In Oswald Panagl & Thomas Krisch (eds.), Latein und Indogermanisch. Akten des Kolloqiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Salzburg, 23. – 26. September 1986 (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 64), 221–242. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Roberts, William Masfen
1912–1924The History of Rome. 6 Vols. London: J. M. Dent & E. P. Dutton. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0026%3abook%3d1
Rogland, Max Frederick
2003Alleged non-past uses of qatal in Classical Hebrew (Studia Semitica Neerlandica 44). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, John C.
1935Ammianus Marcellinus. History, volume I: Books 14–19 (Loeb Classical Library 300). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a2007​.01​.0081
Rothstein, Susan D.
2004Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect (Explorations in Semantics 2). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect (Linguistik aktuell 110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert
1949The concept of mind. London: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Sage, Evan T.
1935Livy. History of Rome. Books 31–34 (Loeb Classical Library 295). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0207%3abook%3d31
Serbat, Guy
1980aLe parfait de l’indicatif actif en latin. In Serbat (ed.) 1980b, 12–54.Google Scholar
ed. 1980bLe sens du parfait de l’indicatif en Latin: colloque de Morigny 2 déc. 78 (Civilisations 1). Paris: Université de Paris – Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Sihler, Andrew L.
1995New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, David R.
(ed. and trans.) 1999Letters to Atticus. 4 vols. (Loeb Classical Library, 7, 8, 97, 491). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1987The origin of aspect in the Indo-European languages. Glotta 65.1–18.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barry
1977Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1:2. 199–220.Google Scholar
Vairel, Hélène
1980La valeur de l’opposition infectum/perfectum en latin: Examen et critique des diverses interprétations proposées. Valeur en langue et valeurs d’emploi des formes du perfectum. In Serbat (ed.) 1980b, 55–86.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66:2.143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Neville H.
1931Pro Milone. In Pisonem. Pro Scauro. Pro Fonteio. Pro Rabirio Postumo. Pro Marcello. Pro Ligario. Pro rege Deiotaro (Loeb Classical Library 252). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Way, Arthur G.
(trans) 1955Alexandrian War. African War. Spanish War (Loeb Classical Library 402). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willi, Andreas
2009To be or not to be: The Latin perfect in -v-. Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 122. 228–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016The Oscan Perfect in -TT- . Transactions of the Philological Society 114:1. 75–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, Charles D.
(trans.) 1856The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Vol. 2. London: Henry G. Bohn. http://​www​.perseus​.tufts​.edu​/hopper​/text​?doc​=Perseus%3atext%3a1999​.02​.0019%3atext%3dCorn.