Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 305323


Allen, Margaret
1978Morphological investigations. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. Word Structure 5. 28–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Unnatural kinds. In Ana Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds.), The morphome debate, 11–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Nanna Fuhrhop
2002Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 451–490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
1991Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Geert E. Booij & Jaap van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1993On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 181–208. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Rochelle Lieber
1991Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29. 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Richard Piepenbrock & Leon Gulikers
1995CELEX2 LDC96L14. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Greville G. Corbett, Dustan Brown & Andrew Hippisley
(eds.) 2007Deponency and other morphological mismatches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chrupala, Grzegorz
2008Towards a machine-learning architecture for lexical functional grammar parsing. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University dissertation.Google Scholar
Deerwester, Scott, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer & Richard Harshman
1990Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6). 391–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fabb, Nigel
1988English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 527–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, Joseph & Alec Marantz
2015Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the Full Decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language 143. 81–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, Joseph, Linnaea Stockall & Alec Marantz
2013MEG masked priming evidence for form-based decomposition of irregular verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7. 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz
1999Lexical strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Keyser Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald & Lars Borin
2011Unsupervised learning of morphology. Computational Linguistics 37(2). 309–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2001Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39. 1041–1070. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language 78. 527–555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Causes and consequences of word structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Ingo Plag
2004What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 565–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kann, Katharina & Hinrich Schütze
2016MED: The LMU system for the SIGMORPHON 2016 shared task on morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the 14th SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, 62–70. Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982Lexical morphology and phonology. In In-Seok Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (Volume 1), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lázaro, Miguel, Victor Illera & Javier Sainz
2016The suffix priming effect: Further evidence for an early morpho-orthographic segmentation process independent of its semantic content. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove) 69(1). 197–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luís, Ana R. & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero
(eds.) 2016The morphome debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2016Some lessons from history: Morphomes in diachrony. In Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds.), The Morphome Debate, 33–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manova, Stela
2010Suffix combinations in Bulgarian: Parsability and hierarchy-based ordering. Morphology 20. 267–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011A cognitive approach to SUFF1-SUFF2 combinations: A tribute to Carl Friedrich Gauss. Word Structure 4. 272–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Affix order and the structure of the Slavic word. In Stela Manova (ed.), Affix ordering across languages and frameworks, 205–230. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manuscript. Suffix combinations in English, Italian, Polish and Slovene: Theory and processing. University of Vienna.
Manova, Stela & Mark Aronoff
2010Modeling affix order. Morphology 20. 109–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manova, Stela & Luigi Talamo
2015On the significance of the corpus size in affix-order research. SKASE Journal of theoretical linguistics 12(3). 369–397.Google Scholar
Manova, Stela, Harald Hammarström, Itamar Kastner & Yining Nie
2020What is in a morpheme? Theoretical, experimental and computational approaches to the relation of meaning and form in morphology. Word Structure 13(1). 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David & Roger Schvaneveldt
1971Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90. 227–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, Tomas, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S. Corrado & Jeff Dean
2013Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Chris J. C. Burges, Léon Bottou, Zoubin Ghahramani, & Kilian Q. Weinberger (eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 26 (NIPS 2013), 3111–3119. Neural Information Processing Systems.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil
1986The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Paul
2014The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology 24. 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo
1996Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited. A Reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34. 769–798. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2002The Role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001, 285–314. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo & Harald Baayen
2009Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85. 109–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy
1974Topics in English morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Evidence for rule conflation. Paper presented at The 4th American international Morphology Meeting (AIMM4), Stony Brook, New York, May 3–5.
Taft, Marcus
1979Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition 7(4). 263–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Marcus & Kenneth Forster
1975Lexical storage and the retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14. 630–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15. 607–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talamo, Luigi
2015Suffix combinations in Italian: Selectional restrictions and processing constraints. In Stela Manova (ed.), Affix ordering across languages and frameworks, 175–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yonghui, Mike Schuster, Zhifeng Chen, Quoc V. Le, Mohammad Norouzi, Wolfgang Macherey, Maxim Krikun et al.
2016Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. Technical Report, arXiv:1609.08144v2 [cs.CL]Google Scholar