Chapter published in:
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 327347
References

References

Anderson, Stephen R.
1980Notes on the development of phonological theory. Language and Speech 23. 115–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1985Phonology in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000Reflections on ‘On the phonetic rules of Russian’. Folia Linguistica 34. 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Why linguistics needs the cognitive scientist. Psychiatry 64(1). 11–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan
1895 [1972]An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In Edward Stankiewicz (ed.), A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology, 144–212. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2004Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1941Phonemic overlapping. American Speech 16. 278–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein
1989Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1995The Rise of Optimality Theory. GLOT International 1(6). 3–7.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1959Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal behavior. Language 35. 547–578.Google Scholar
1964Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1965Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle & Fred Lukoff
1956On accent and juncture in English. In Morris Halle, Horace Lunt & Hugh MacLean (eds.), For Roman Jakobson, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1985The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 223–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N., & Rachid Ridouane
(eds.) 2011Where do features come from? Cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovolsky, Michael
1994Review article: Measuring the Interface. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 39. 113–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John
1979Autosegmental phonology. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John & Bernard Laks
2019Battle in the mind fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Joshua M.
2019On the rapid expansion of optimality theory at the end of the twentieth century. Historiographia Linguistica 46. 133–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1957On the phonetic rules of Russian. Unpublished paper read to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.
1959The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1962Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Zellig
1951Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1980A metrical theory of stress rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. [Circulated by the Indiana University Linguistics club; later published by Garland Press.].Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan
1976An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W.
1965On some recent claims in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1. 13–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924The philosophy of grammar. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel
1976Syllable based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973Phonological representations. In Osamu Fujimura (ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory, 1–136. Tokyo: TEC Company.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles
1970On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 291–306.Google Scholar
Kleene, Stephen C.
1952Introduction to meta-mathematics. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y.
1975The intonational system of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Published 1979 by Garland Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark Y. & Alan S. Prince
1977On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 249–336.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J.
1988Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 45. 84–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Hidden generalizations: Phonological opacity in optimality theory. London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff
2008The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc
to appear. History of phonology: Optimality Theory. In Elan Dresher & Harry van der Hulst eds. Oxford handbook of the history of phonology Oxford Oxford University Press
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité
1993Introduction: The emergence of constraints in generative phonology and a comparison of three constraint-based models. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38. 127–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1947aGrammatical prerequisites to phonemic analysis. Word 3. 155–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1947bPhonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Alan Prince
1988On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28. 73–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Planck, Max
1949Scientific autobiography, and other papers. New York: Philosophical Library. Translated from German by Frank Gaynor.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul
1964Boas and the development of phonology: Some comments based on Iroquoian. International Journal of American Linguistics 30. 269–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan
1983Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado; published as Prince & Smolensky (2004).Google Scholar
2004Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland
1986On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Rumelhart et al. (1986), 216–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E., James L. McClelland & The PDP Research Group
(eds.) 1986Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sagey, Elizabeth
1990The representation of features in nonlinear phonology: The articulator node. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
1925Sound patterns in language. Language 1. 37–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de linguistiique générale. Lausanne: Librairie Payot. Edited by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1972Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. New York Review of Books 18(12). 16–24.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1984Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.
1957Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, David
1973A dissertation on natural phonology. Chicago: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Watson, John B.
1924Behaviorism. New York: The People’s Institute Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Weiss, Albert Paul
1925Linguistics and psychology. Language 1. 52–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North & Bertrand Russell
1910–1913Principia mathematica, Volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar