Chapter 18
A short history of phonology in America
Plus c’est la même chose, plus ça change
Although awareness of a difference between the
study of the sound patterns of particular languages and the study of
the language-independent capacity of humans to produce and perceive
sound existed in European and American thought in the early years of
the twentieth century, a clear enunciation of the distinction
between phonology and phonetics is due to Otto Jespersen in 1924. As phonology became
established as a coherent object of inquiry, two themes can be
identified in theorizing about it: first, the question of whether
phonological structure is in the mind, as an aspect of human
cognition, or only a set of facts about the external data of
language; and second, the question of whether there are valid
universals of phonological structure. These issues are traced across
the past century in the work of American linguists. An additional
factor identifiable in historical shifts in theoretical perspective
is somewhat less principled: as discussion of fundamental issues
becomes more technical and relevant data harder to identify,
students and scholars looking for productive research topics tend to
abandon previous frameworks for others in a search for lower hanging
fruit without necessarily having resolved the earlier questions.
Article outline
- 1.The early history
- 2.The rise of generative phonology
- 2.1Phonological structure as an aspect of the mind
- 2.2The place of universals
- 3.Phonological theory after Chomsky & Halle (1968)
- 3.1The logicism of SPE and reaction to it
- 3.2A focus on representations
- 3.3The rise of optimality theory
- 4.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Anderson, Stephen R.
1980 Notes
on the development of phonological
theory.
Language and
Speech 23. 115–123.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
1985 Phonology
in the twentieth
century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2000 Reflections
on ‘On the phonetic rules of
Russian’.
Folia
Linguistica 34. 1–17.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Stephen R.
2001 Why
linguistics needs the cognitive
scientist.
Psychiatry 64(1). 11–13.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan
1895
[1972] An attempt at a theory
of phonetic
alternations. In
Edward Stankiewicz (ed.),
A
Baudouin de Courtenay
anthology, 144–212. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, Juliette
2004 Evolutionary
phonology: The emergence of sound
patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloch, Bernard
1941 Phonemic
overlapping.
American
Speech 16. 278–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: Holt.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein
1989 Articulatory
gestures as phonological
units.
Phonology 6. 201–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, Luigi
1995 The
Rise of Optimality
Theory.
GLOT
International 1(6). 3–7.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1959 Review
of B. F. Skinner,
Verbal
behavior.
Language 35. 547–578.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1964 Current
issues in linguistic
theory. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1965 Some
controversial questions in phonological
theory.
Journal of
Linguistics 1. 97–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968 The
sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam, Morris Halle & Fred Lukoff
1956 On
accent and juncture in
English. In
Morris Halle,
Horace Lunt &
Hugh MacLean (eds.),
For
Roman
Jakobson, 65–80. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clements, George N.
1985 The
geometry of phonological
features.
Phonology
Yearbook 2. 223–252.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clements, George N., & Rachid Ridouane
Dobrovolsky, Michael
1994 Review
article: Measuring the
Interface.
Canadian Journal
of
Linguistics 39. 113–140.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John
1979 Autosegmental
phonology. New York: Garland Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John & Bernard Laks
2019 Battle
in the mind
fields. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris
1957 On
the phonetic rules of
Russian. Unpublished paper
read to the Annual Meeting of
the Linguistic Society of
America, Chicago.
Halle, Morris
1959 The
sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris
1962 Phonology
in generative
grammar.
Word 18. 54–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Zellig
1951 Methods
in structural
linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce
1980 A
metrical theory of stress
rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. [Circulated
by the Indiana University Linguistics club; later published
by Garland Press.].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hooper, Joan
1976 An
introduction to natural generative
phonology. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Householder, Fred W.
1965 On
some recent claims in phonological
theory.
Journal of
Linguistics 1. 13–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto
1924 The
philosophy of grammar. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahn, Daniel
1976 Syllable
based generalizations in English
phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 Phonological
representations. In
Osamu Fujimura (ed.),
Three
dimensions of linguistic
theory, 1–136. Tokyo: TEC Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kisseberth, Charles
1970 On
the functional unity of phonological
rules.
Linguistic
Inquiry 1. 291–306.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kleene, Stephen C.
1952 Introduction
to meta-mathematics. New York: Van Nostrand.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Mark Y.
1975 The
intonational system of
English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Published
1979 by Garland Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Mark Y. & Alan S. Prince
1977 On
stress and linguistic
rhythm.
Linguistic
Inquiry 8. 249–336.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, John J.
1988 Feature
geometry and dependency: A
review.
Phonetica 45. 84–108.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, John J.
2007 Hidden
generalizations: Phonological opacity in optimality
theory. London: Equinox Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mielke, Jeff
2008 The
emergence of distinctive
features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986 Prosodic
phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Oostendorp, Marc
to
appear.
History of
phonology: Optimality
Theory. In
Elan Dresher &
Harry van der Hulst eds.
Oxford
handbook of the history of
phonology Oxford Oxford University Press
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité
1993 Introduction:
The emergence of constraints in generative phonology and a
comparison of three constraint-based
models.
Canadian Journal of
Linguistics 38. 127–153.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pike, Kenneth L.
1947a Grammatical
prerequisites to phonemic
analysis.
Word 3. 155–172.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pike, Kenneth L.
1947b Phonemics:
A technique for reducing languages to
writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven & Alan Prince
1988 On
language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel
distributed processing model of language
acquisition.
Cognition 28. 73–193.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Planck, Max
1949 Scientific
autobiography, and other
papers. New York: Philosophical Library. Translated from German by Frank Gaynor.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul
1964 Boas
and the development of phonology: Some comments based on
Iroquoian.
International
Journal of American
Linguistics 30. 269–280.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan
1983 Relating
to the grid.
Linguistic
Inquiry 14. 19–100.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993 Optimality
theory: Constraint interaction in generative
grammar. Manuscript, Rutgers University and University of Colorado; published
as
Prince &
Smolensky (2004).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
2004 Optimality
theory: Constraint interaction in generative
grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland
1986 On
learning the past tenses of English
verbs. In
Rumelhart et al. (1986), 216–271.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, David E., James L. McClelland & The
PDP Research
Group
(eds.) 1986 Parallel
distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure
of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sagey, Elizabeth
1990 The
representation of features in nonlinear phonology: The
articulator node. New York: Garland.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, Edward
1925 Sound
patterns in
language.
Language 1. 37–51.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916 Cours
de linguistiique
générale. Lausanne: Librairie Payot. Edited
by
Charles Bally &
Albert Sechehaye, with
the collaboration of Albert
Riedlinger.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R.
1972 Chomsky’s
revolution in
linguistics.
New York Review
of
Books 18(12). 16–24.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1984 Phonology
and syntax: The relation between sound and
structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skinner, B. F.
1957 Verbal
behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stampe, David
1973 A
dissertation on natural
phonology. Chicago: University of Chicago dissertation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watson, John B.
1924 Behaviorism. New York: The People’s Institute Publishing Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiss, Albert Paul
1925 Linguistics
and
psychology.
Language 1. 52–57.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whitehead, Alfred North & Bertrand Russell
1910–1913 Principia
mathematica, Volumes 1–3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Alkiyumi, Mohammed
2023.
The creative linguistic achievements of Alkhalil bin Ahmed Al-Farahidi, and motives behind his creations: A case study.
Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.