Antinucci, Francesco & Guglielmo Cinque
1977Sull’ordine delle parole in italiano: L’emarginazione. Studi di grammatica italiana 6. 121–146.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP, Volume 2, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17(1). 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina
2017Two types of subject inversion in Italian wh-questions. Revue roumaine de linguistique 62. 233–252.Google Scholar
Bonan, Caterina
2018On insituness and (very) low wh-positions. The case of Trevigiano. GG@G: Generative Grammar in Geneva 11. Special Issue: Proceedings of the 1st SynCart workshop “From maps to principles”, edited by Giuseppe Samo, Karen Martini & Giuliano Bocci, 21–41.Google Scholar
2019On clause-internally moved wh-phrases. Wh-to-Foc, nominative clitics, and the theory of northern Italian wh-in situ. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Genève.Google Scholar
Bosković, Željko
1997Superiority effects with multiple wh-fronting in Serbo-Croatian. Lingua 102(1). 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2002Against optional and null clitics: Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 58. 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993A null theory of phrase and compund stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24. 239–298.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2010The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 65–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Crousaz, Isabelle & Ur Shlonsky
2003The distribution of a subject clitic pronoun in a Franco-Provençal dialect and the licensing of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 413–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1990Clitic doubling, wh-movement, and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3). 351–397.Google Scholar
1994The syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Nama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi
2009Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1). 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2001On wh-questions in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics / Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 46(1/2). 41–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary
2013Deriving “wh-in-situ” through movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), Information structure and agreement, 175–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1991Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4). 647–686.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita
2014Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in Romance. Lingua 150. 171–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1982Paths and categories. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook on generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001On the position ‘Int(errogative)’ in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 3, 3–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005On some properties of subjects and topics. In Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds.), Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 203–224. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
2017The left periphery of the clause – primarily illustrated for Italian. In Martin Everaert & Henk C. Van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 2, 1–30. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky
2007Strategies of subject extraction. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 115–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2015The interaction of focus, givenness, and prosody. A study of Italian clause structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1996Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance’. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1). 79–123.Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Julie Franck & Luigi Rizzi
2016Intervention effects and relativized minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179. 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael
2012Contrastive topics decomposed. Semantics & Pragmatics 5. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar