Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 31, Bucharest
Edited by Alexandru Nicolae and Adina Dragomirescu
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 355] 2021
► pp. 92109
References

References

Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2005Cross-linguistic and cross-categorial variation of datives. In Melita Stavrou & Arhonto Terzi (eds.), Advances in Greek generative syntax. In honor of Dimitra Theophanopoulou-Kontou, 61–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John
2011On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(2). 335–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Chiyo Nishida
2010The Spanish dative alternation revisited. In Sonia Colina (ed.), Romance linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 217–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2005Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17(1). 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra
2020Ditransitive constructions with DOM-ed direct objects in Romanian. In Anna Pineda & Jaume Mateu (eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond, 117–142. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra, Anca Dinu & Alina Tigău
2017Romanian dative configurations: Ditransitive verbs, a tentative analysis. Revue roumaine de linguistique 62(2). 157–178.Google Scholar
Cuervo, Cristina
2003Datives at large. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Deal Amy Rose
2013Possessor raising. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3). 391–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diaconescu, Constanţa Rodica & María Luisa Rivero
2007An applicative analysis of double object constructions in Romanian. Probus 19(2). 209–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dogget, Teal
2004All things being unequal: Locality in movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2002Possession and the DOC. In Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook, Volume 2. 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iorga, Ana
2013O tipologie a dativului românesc. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bucharest.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1984Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2008Reference to the individuals, person and the variety of mapping parameters. In Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination, 189–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero
2017Historical changes in Basque dative alternations: Evidence for a P-based (neo)derivational analysis. Glossa 2(1). 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, Anna
2012Double object constructions and dative/accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: A unified account. Borealis 2(1). 57–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2008Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Mark
2008Defective agree, case alternation, and the prominence of person. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 86. 137–161.Google Scholar
Tigău, Alina
2011Syntax and interpretation of the direct object in Romance and Germanic languages with an emphasis on Romanian, German, Dutch and English. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar