Part of
Language and Text: Data, models, information and applications
Edited by Adam Pawłowski, Jan Mačutek, Sheila Embleton and George Mikros
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 356] 2021
► pp. 6992
References

Software and digital dictionaries

Graduate Schools of Informatics in Kyoto University & NTT Communication Science Laboratories
2008Morphological analyzer: MeCab , version 0.97. ([URL])
National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics
2008Digital dictionary for the natural language processing: UniDic , version 1.3.9. ([URL])
Borenstein, Michael, Larry V. Hedges, Julian P. T. Higgins & Hannah R. Rothstein
2009Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čech, Radek, Petr Pajas & Ján Mačutek
2010Full valency. Verb valency without distinguishing complements and adjuncts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 17(4). 291–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čech, Radek & Ludmila Uhlířová
2014Adverbials in Czech: Models for their frequency distribution. In Ludmila Uhlířová, Gabriel Altmann, Radek Čech & Jan Mačutek (eds.), Empirical approaches to text and language analysis, 45–59. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Google Scholar
Del Re, A. C.
2015Manual of Package ‘compute.es’ (Compute Effect Sizes) of R, version 0.2-4. [URL] (4 March 2018.)
Minami, Fujio
1974Gendai nihongo no kozo [The structure of the present Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1993Gendai nihongo bunpo no rinkaku [The outline of the grammar of comtemporary Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
National Language Research Institute
1964Gendai Zasshi 90shu no Yogo Yoji: Dai3bunsatsu: Bunseki [Vocabulary and Chinese characters in ninety magazines of today: Volume 3: Analysis of results]. Tokyo: Shuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Ogino, Takao, Masahiro Kobayashi & Hitoshi Isahara
2003Nihongo Doshi no Ketsugoka [Verb valency in Japanese]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Sanada, Haruko
2012Joshi no Shiyo Dosu to Ketsugoka ni Kansuru Keiryoteki Bunseki Hoho no Kento [Quantitative approach to frequency data of Japanese postpositions and valency]. Rissho Daigaku Keizaigaku Kiho [The quarterly report of economics of Rissho University] 62(2). 1–35.Google Scholar
2014The choice of postpositions of the subject and the ellipsis of the subject in Japanese. In Ludmila Uhlířová, Gabriel Altmann, Radek Čech & Jan Mačutek (eds.), Empirical approaches to text and language analysis, 190–206. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Google Scholar
2015A co-occurrence and an order of valency in Japanese sentences. In Arjuna Tuzzi, Jan Mačutek & Martina Benešová (eds.), Recent contributions to quantitative linguistics, 139–152. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016The Menzerath-Altmann law and sentence structure. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 23(3). 256–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018aNegentropy of dependency types and parts of speech in the clause. In Jingyang Jiang & Haitao Liu (eds.), Quantitative analysis of dependency structures, 119–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bQuantitative interrelations of properties of complement and adjunct. In Lu Wang, Reinhard Köhler & Arjuna Tuzzi (eds.). Structure, function and process in texts, 78–99. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.Google Scholar
2019Quantitative aspects of the clause: The length, the position and the depth of the clause. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 26(4). 306–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Length of clauses and a perspective on the three dimensional model of Synergetic Linguistics. Rissho Daigaku Keizaigaku Kiho (The Quarterly Journal of Rissho Economics Society), vol. 71(1).