Chapter published in:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 32, Utrecht
Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen and Luisa Meroni
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 357] 2021
► pp. 4970
References
Aboh, Enoch O. & Roland Pfau
2010What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery. The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 5, 91–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, Theodora & Mary Baltazani
2012Focus in Greek wh-questions. In Ivona Kučerová & Ad Neeleman (eds.), Information structure: Contrasts and positions, 206–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Artstein, Ron
2002Parts of words: Compositional semantics for prosodic constituents. Ph.D. Dissertation: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
2006Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14. 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Julia Hirschberg & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
2005The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Sun- Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio Cruschina
2017Two types of subject inversion in Italian wh-questions. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62(3). 233–252.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano & Silvio Cruschina
2018Postverbal subjects and nuclear pitch accent in Italian wh-questions. In Roberto Petrosino, Pietro Cerrone & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), From sounds to structures. Beyond the veil of Maya, 467–494. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano & Lucia Pozzan
2014Questions (and experimental answers) about Italian subjects. Subject positions in main and indirect question in L1 and attrition. In Carla Contemori & Lena Dal Pozzo (eds.), Inquiries into linguistic theory and language acquisition. Papers offered to Adriana Belletti, 28–44. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano, Luigi Rizzi & Mamoru Saito
2018On the incompatibility of wh and focus. Gengo Kenkyui – Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan 154. 29–51.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano, Valentina Bianchi & Silvio Cruschina
2021Focus in wh-questions: Evidence from Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39. 405–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano, Silvio Cruschina & Luigi Rizzi
2021. On some special properties of why in syntax and prosody. In Gabriela Soare ed. Why is ‘why’ unique? Its syntactic and semantic properties 293 316 Berlin De Gruyter
Brody, Michael
1995Focus and checking theory. In Istvan Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian 5: Levels and structures, 29–43. Szeged: JATEPress.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2003On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26. 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cable, Seth
2010The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1976Conditions on rules of grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2. 303–352.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2007Inherent focus on wh-phrases. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11. 209–228.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia, Marisa Cruz, Flaviane Svartman, Gisela Collischonn, Aline Fonseca, Carolina Serra, Pedro Oliveira & Marina Vigário
2015Intonational variation in Portuguese: European and Brazilian varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 235–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Jacqueline Guéron
1999English grammar: A generative perspective. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & Pilar Prieto
2015Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 350–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael A.
1993Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013Fronting, focus and illocutionary force in Sardinian. Lingua 134. 75–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2001For a structured account of questions and answers. In Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur vox sapientiae. A festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, 287–319. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55. 243–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Questions. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning, Volume 2, 1742–1758. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. Manuscript. Focus and contrastive topics in question and answer acts. Humboldt-Universität Berlin & Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS) Berlin 2017.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1996Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Second edn. in 2008).Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna
2001I toni accentuali nelle interrogative aperte (wh-) dell’italiano di Lucca. In Camilla Bettoni, Antonio Zampolli & Daniela Zorzi (eds.), Atti del II congresso di studi dell’Associazione Italiana di linguistica applicata, 175–194. Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.Google Scholar
Muntendam, Antje & Francisco Torreira
2016Focus and prosody in Spanish and Quechua: Insights from an interactive task. In Meghan E. Armstrong, Nicholas Hendriksen & Maria del Mar Vanrell (eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields, 69–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Joan Borràs-Comes, Teresa Cabré, Verònica Crespo-Sendra, Ignasi Mascaró, Paolo Roseano, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin & Maria del Mar Vanrell
2015Intonational phonology of Catalan and its dialectal varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 9–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Ingo
2002Question/answer congruence and the semantics of wh-phrases. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 73–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga
1991Echo-w-Sätze und Echo-w-Fragen. In Marga Reis & Inger Rosengren (eds.), Fragesätze und Fragen. Referate Anlässlich der 12. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Saarbrücken 1990, 49–76. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012On the analysis of echo questions. Tampa Papers in Linguistics 3. 1–24.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative Syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In Jae-Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds.), Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 49. Papers in Semantics, 91–136. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
2012Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5. 1–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sichel-Bazin, Rafèu, Carolin Buthke & Trudel Meisenburg
2012The prosody of Occitan-French bilinguals. In Kurt Braunmüller & Christoph Gabriel (eds.), Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies, 349–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas
1990On the syntax of English echo questions. Lingua 81. 141–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Echo questions and the Minimalist Program. Linguistic Inquiry 41. 131–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1995Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and Prominence. Ph.D. Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar & Olga Fernández-Soriano
2013Variation at the interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan and Spanish prosody and word order. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12. 253–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Language variation at the prosody-syntax interface. Focus in European Spanish. In Marco García García & Melanie Uth (eds.), Focus realization in Romance and beyond, 33–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar, Francesc Ballone, Carlo Schirru & Pilar Prieto
2015Sardinian intonational phonology: Logudorese and Campidanese varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonational variation in Romance, 317–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, María-Luisa
1998Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2016Nuclear stress and information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 165–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María-Luisa & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
2005Phrasal stress, focus, and syntax. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The syntax companion, 522–556. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar