Chapter published in:
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning. Papers from the XXth ICEHL
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 15–40

Chapter 1
Grimm’s Law and Verner’s Law

Towards a unified phonetic account

| University of Oslo | Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
This paper gives a unified account of Grimm’s and Verner’s Laws in light of findings from experimental phonetics. The Germanic stress shift and stress placement shift are separate phenomena, and I argue that Iverson & Salmons’ (2003) shift in ‘articulatory setting’ corresponds to the former, and that the shift in how prosodic emphasis was expressed, from high pitch to dynamic stress, set Grimm’s Law in motion, because a phonetic correlate of dynamic stress is higher subglottal pressure. Increased subglottal pressure induced aspiration, affrication and spirantisation in Proto-Indo-European (PIE) voiceless stops and devoicing in voiced stops. The voiced aspirates became fricatives, which were allophones of voiced stops; these fricative allophones later fell together with the main plosive allophones to produce Germanic voiced stops.
Keywords: Grimm’s Law, Verner’s Law, Germanic enhancement, aspiration, experimental phonetics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Problems with the traditional account
    • 2.1The original IE/Gmc obstruent inventory
    • 2.2Chronology and intermediate stages
    • 2.3A unified phonetic account
  • 3.Air-flow, pressure, voicing, aspiration and laryngeal specification
  • 4.‘Germanic enhancement’
  • 5.Remaining problems
    • 5.1The voiced aspirates and fricative stopping
    • 5.2Devoicing
    • 5.3A Gmc consonant shift cycle?
    • 5.4The prime mover
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 02 February 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.01ste
References
Allen, W. Sidney
1987 [1968] Vox Graeca: A guide to the pronunciation of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Avery, Peter & William J. Idsardi
2001 Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T. Alan Hall (ed.). Distinctive feature theory, 41–70. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Michael Jessen & Catherine Ringen
2013 Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics 49. 259–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein
1989 Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-99/100, 69–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre
1965 Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish: An interim report. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard, Dominic Watt, Carmen Llamas, Damien Hall & Jennifer Nycz
2011 Variation in voice onset time along the Scottish-English border. ICPhS XVII, 591–594.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1972 A reformulation of Grimm’s Law. In Michael Brame (ed.), Contributions to generative phonology, 108–122. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas & Vjaceslav Ivanov
1973 Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der gemeinindogermanischen Verschlüsse: Vorläufiger Bericht. Phonetica 27. 150–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goblirsch, Kurt G.
2001 The Icelandic Consonant Shift in its Germanic context. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 116. 117–133.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob
1822–1837 Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterichschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997 On stress and accent in Indo-European. Language 73. 275–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helgason, Pétur & Catherine Ringen
2008 Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics 36. 607–628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henton, Caroline, Peter Ladefoged & Ian Maddieson
1992 Stops in the World’s languages. Phonetica 49. 65–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick
2002 Germanic obstruent lenition: Some mutual implications of theoretical and historical phonology. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle upon Tyne PhD thesis.
2005 Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of obstruent laryngeal specification. In Marc van Oostendorp & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds.), The internal organization of phonological segments, 319–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 New-dialect formation in nineteenth century Liverpool: A brief history of Scouse. In Anthony Grant & Clive Grey (eds.), The Mersey Sound: Liverpool’s language, people and places, 106–140. Liverpool: Open House Press.Google Scholar
2008 Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: Tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and fortition, 9–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Lenition in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref (1 August, 2018)Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1973 Glottalized and murmured occlusives in Indo-European. Glossa 7. 141–166.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill & Dominic Watt
2012 English accents and dialects (5th edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, Leigh & Paul A. Morris
2016 Prevoicing and aspiration in southern American English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 215–224.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Joseph C. Salmons
1995 Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12(3). 369–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Laryngeal enhancement in early Germanic. Phonology 20. 43–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, Sverre Stausland
2011 The phonetics and phonologization of Verner’s law. In Thomas Krisch & Thomas Lindner (eds.), Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog, 232–241. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Kager, René, Suzanne van der Feest, Paula Fikkert, Annemarie Kerkhoff & Tania S. Zamuner
2007 Representations of [voice]: Evidence from acquisition. In Jeroen van de Weijer & Erik Jan van der Torre (eds.), Voicing in Dutch: (de)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics, 41–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J. & Kenneth N. Stevens
2006 Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language 82(1). 33–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik
1985 Proto-Indo-European glottalic stops: The comparative evidence. Folia Linguistica Historica 6. 183–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988 Proto-Germanic obstruents. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 27. 3–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, Martin
2015 The role of typology in historical phonology. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 121–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
2005 Vowels and consonants. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Taehong Cho
2001 Linking linguistic contrasts to reality: The case of VOT. In Nina Gronnum & Jørgen Rischel (eds.), Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague XXXI, 212–225. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzel.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1984 Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger & Margaret Laing
2013 The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica 34(1). 93–114.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1993 Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Arthur S. Abramson
1964 A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20(3). 384–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moosmüller, Sylvia & Catherine Ringen
2004 Voice and aspiration in Austrian German plosives. Folia Linguistica 38(1–2). 43–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Katherine
. Manuscript. Experimental Phonology and Phonetics 1984 Available here: http://​www​.morton​-tatham​.co​.uk​/publications​/to​_1994​/Morton​_1984a​.pdf (1 August, 2018)
Moulton, William G.
1954 The stops and spirants of early Germanic. Language 30(1). 1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noske, Roland
2012 The Grimm-Verner push chain and Contrast Preservation Theory. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological explorations: Empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues, 63–86. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1973 The physiology of tone. Consonant types and tone. Southern California Occasional Papers I Linguistics 1. 2–14.Google Scholar
1974 Experimental historical phonology. In John Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics II: Theory and description in phonology, 353–389. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1978 Experimental historical phonology. In Jeri J. Jaeger et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 353–387. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1983 The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech, 189–216. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 Aerodynamics of phonology. Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 92–97.Google Scholar
2003 Phonetics and historical phonology. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 667–686. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rask, Rasmus
1818 Undersøgelse om det gamle nordiske eller islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid
. Manuscript. On the feature [spread glottis] 2006 http://​citeseerx​.ist​.psu​.edu​/viewdoc​/download​?doi​=10​.1​.1​.504​.3088​&rep​=rep1​&type​=pdf (1 August, 2018)Google Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid, G. N. Clements & Rajesh Khatiwada
2011 Language-independent bases of distinctive features. In John Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels (eds.), Tones and Features, 260–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt
1975 A guide to the languages of the world. Stanford: Languages Universals Project.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph
1993 The Glottalic Theory: Survey and synthesis. (Journal of Indo-European Studies, Monograph Series 10.) Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Schluter, Kevin T., Stephen Politzer-Ahles, Meera Al Kaabi & Diogo Almeida
2017 Laryngeal features are phonetically abstract: Mismatch negativity evidence from Arabic, English, and Russian. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Martha, Morgan Sonderegger & Heather Goad
2019 Realization and representation of Nepali laryngeal contrasts: Voiced aspirates and laryngeal realism. Journal of Phonetics 73. 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scobbie, James M. & Alan A. Wrench
2003 An articulatory investigation of word final /l/ and /l/-sandhi in three dialects of English. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 15. 1871–1874.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H.
2010 Aerodynamics of speech, and the puzzle of voiced fricatives. Paper presented at the Conference on Phonetic Universals, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, October 29–30. https://​www​.eva​.mpg​.de​/lingua​/conference​/10​-PhoneticUniversals​/pdf​/Shadle​_Abstract​_fnl​.pdf (1 August, 2018)
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud. F.
2016 Long-vowel shifts in English, c. 1050–1700: Evidence from spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van de Weijer, Jeroen & Erik Jan van der Torre
(eds.) 2007 Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1984 Hochgermanisch und Niedergermanisch. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache 106. 1–45.Google Scholar
1985 The bifurcation theory of the Germanic and German consonant shifts synopsis and some further thoughts. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 527–547. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Grimm’s Law and loanwords. Transactions of the Philological Society 104(2). 129–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verner, Karl
1875 Eine Ausnahme der ersten Lautverschiebung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen 23. 97–130.Google Scholar
Wells, Frederic L.
1905 Experimental phonetics and Verner’s Law. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 5/4. 522–527.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
1982 Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, John
1983 Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. 1322–1336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Graham
2016 Stopping. SLTinfo. https://​www​.sltinfo​.com​/phon101​-stopping/ (1 August, 2018)
Yao, Yao
2009 Understanding VOT Variation in Spontaneous Speech. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2009, 29–43.Google Scholar