Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 245262


Diplomatic Correspondence of Thomas Bodley
1585–1597, Centre for Editing Lives and Letters, based at University College London. Chief editor Robyn Adams. Last accessed April 2019. URL: [URL]
Barton, Ellen. L.
1993Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English 55(7). 745–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and writing. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2006Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(5). 569–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
(ed.) 2011Historical sociopragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella
2006 “Conduct yourself towards all persons on every occasion with civility and in a wise and prudent manner; this will render you esteemed”: Stance features in nineteenth-century business letters. In Marina Dossena & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations, 153–174. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014Letters and letter writing in Early Modern culture: An introduction. Journal of Early Modern Studies 3. 17–35.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina & Susan Fitzmaurice
(eds.) 2006Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse. Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen
2012Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32(4). 433–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Mel
2017Royal language and reported discourse in sixteenth-century correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(1). 30–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Etsuko Oishi
2014Evidentiality in discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3). 321–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M.
2006Diplomatic business: Information, power, and persuasion in Late Modern English diplomatic correspondence. In Marina Dossena & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.). Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations, 77–106. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Jasper Holmes
2007A history of English evidential verbs of appearance. English Language and Linguistics 11(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio
2006Communal Correspondence in Early Modern English: The Philosophical Transactions Network. In Marina Dossena & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations, 17–46. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
2014Stance markers. In Karin Aijmer & Christoph Rühlemann (eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook, 219–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Douglas Biber, & Turo Hiltunen
2011The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the Philosophical Transactions and other contemporary medical prose: Innovations in a pioneering discourse. In Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 221–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter
2017Description, evaluation and stance: Exploring the forms and functions of speech descriptors in Early Modern English. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1). 41–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2). 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen
(eds.) 2010Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2009Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistics variation. In Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 171–193. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela
2017Meta-communicative expressions and situational variation of stance marking: I say and I tell (you) in Early Modern English dialogues. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1). 120–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López Couso, Maria José
1996On the history of methinks: From impersonal construction to fossilized expression. Folia Linguistica Historica 17(1–2). 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Imogen & Mel Evans
2019 “Right trusty and well-beloved”: The socio-pragmatics of gender, power and stance in sixteenth-century English letters. In Ursula Lutzky & Minna Nevala (eds.), Reference and identity in public discourses, 67–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2015Epistemic legitimisation and inter/subjectivity in the discourse of parliamentary and public inquiries. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3). 261–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella
2014The pragmatics of Sir Thomas Bodley’s diplomatic correspondence. Journal of Early Modern Studies 3. 117–131.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2013Making knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic evidentiality. Discourse Studies 15(5). 627–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevala, Minna
2011Altering distance and defining authority: Person reference in Late Modern English. In Jonathan Culpeper (ed.), Historical Sociopragmatics, 61–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okulska, Urszula
2006Textual strategies in the diplomatic correspondence of the Middle and Early Modern English periods: The narrative report letter as a genre. In Marina Dossena & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations, 47–76. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna
1999Male and female styles in 17th correspondence: i think. Language Variation and Change 11. 123–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Historical pragmatics, 651–677. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Variation and change in patterns of self-reference in early English correspondence. In Jonathan Culpeper (ed.), Historical sociopragmatics, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank
2003Modality in English: Theoretical, descriptive and typological issues. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in Contemporary English, 1–17. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2000Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface (Current Research in the Semantic/Pragmatic Interface 6). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willliams, Graham T.