Cover not available
Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Historical English in contact
Edited by Bettelou Los, Chris Cummins, Lisa Gotthard, Alpo Honkapohja and Benjamin Molineaux
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 359] 2022
► pp. 143–164

Chapter 8
The taking off and catching on of etymological spellings in Early Modern English

Evidence from the EEBO Corpus

ORCID logo | Keio University
ORCID logo | Kyoto University

This chapter examines the path that orthographic etymologisation, as in doubt and verdict, followed mainly in the course of the sixteenth century. Few corpus-based studies have been undertaken on etymological spellings, but the recent availability of the large-sized EEBO Corpus must be of great help in making it clear when and how etymological spellings took off and caught on in the Early Modern English period. Besides giving a close description of the process of the orthographic shift, we discuss some methodological problems in the use of the corpus, stressing at the same time that it is an excellent tool, when carefully used, for studies in the history of English.

Keywords: etymological spelling, Renaissance, the sixteenth century, EEBO Corpus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies
  • 3.The EEBO Corpus
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1admonish
    • 4.2amethyst
    • 4.3apothecary
    • 4.4captive
    • 4.5cauldron
    • 4.6cognizance
    • 4.7falcon
    • 4.8lethargy “dullness”
    • 4.9lethargy “lead”
    • 4.10orthography
    • 4.11phantasm
    • 4.12phantom
    • 4.13pheasant
    • 4.14salmon
    • 4.15verdict
    • 4.16Co-occurrence of spelling variants
  • 5.Process of etymologising: A case of lexical diffusion?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 2 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.359.08hot
References

Sources

Corpus of Historical American English
2010 Presented by Mark Davies. (Available online at [URL])
Corpus Resource Database (CoRD)
Corpus Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English, University of Helsinki. (Available online at [URL])
EEBO Corpus
2017 Presented by Mark Davies. (Available online at [URL])
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary
1989 (2nd edn.). By John A. Simpson & Edmund S. C. Weiner, Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Available online as Oxford English Dictionary Online at [URL])
Aitchison, Jean
1990 The missing link: The role of the lexicon. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical linguistics and philology, 11–28. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Language change: Progress or decay (3rd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles
2000 [1993] The English language: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew
1972 The time dimension: Contribution toward a theory of sound change. Foundations of Language: International Journal of Language and Philosophy 8. 457–498.Google Scholar
1976 Relative chronology: Three methods of reconstruction. Journal of Linguistics 12. 209–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew & Hsin-I. Hsieh
1971 The time variable in phonological change. Journal of Linguistics 7. 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew & William S.-Y. Wang
1975 Sound change: Actuation and implementation. Language 51. 255–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
1999 Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: The dance of language change? In Ana Bringas López et al. (eds.), Woonderous Ænglissce: SELIM studies in medieval English language, 51–64. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo (Servizo de Publicacións).Google Scholar
2003 Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 54–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1991 Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horobin, Simon
2013 Does spelling matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hotta, Ryuichi
2012 The order and schedule of nominal plural formation transfer in three southern dialects of Early Middle English. In Irén Hagedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 22–27 August 2010, 94–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Etymological respellings on the eve of spelling standardisation. Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature 30. 41–58.Google Scholar
2017 The spelling and syntax of doubt in Early Modern English: Variation and Latin influence. In Mitsumi Uchida, Yoko Iyeiri & Lawrence Schourup (eds.), Language contact and variation in the history of English, 43–60. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995 The phonological basis of sound change. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 640–670. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Helen Baker
2017 Corpus linguistics and 17th-century prostitution: Computational linguistics and history. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, Mieko & William S-Y. Wang
1996 Snowball effect in lexical diffusion: The development of -s in the third person singular present indicative in English. In Derek Britton (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 119–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Evolution theory and lexical diffusion. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, 315–343. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Vivian
1999 Orthography and punctuation. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language 3, 13–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scragg, Donald G.
1974 A history of English spelling. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Yuki
2018 Variation among relative markers in Early Modern English: Evidence from the EEBO Corpus. Zephyr 30. 28–45. [URL] (3 April, 2021)
Upward, Christopher & George Davidson
2011 The history of English spelling. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S-Y.
1969 Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45. 9–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, William S-Y. & Chinfa Lien
1993 Bidirectional diffusion in sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 345–400. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy
2014 <U> or <O>: A dilemma of the Middle English scribal practice. In Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt & Daniel Schreier (eds.), Contact, variation, and change in the history of English, 305–323. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Iyeiri, Yoko & Mitsumi Uchida
2021. Etymological Spellings in William Caxton’s Translations. English Studies 102:8 ► pp. 991 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.