Chapter published in:
Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 35–56

Chapter 2
A child’s view of Romance modification

| University of Toronto
Languages vary as to what kind of phrasal categories allow recursive iteration of self-same embedding. Children first learn an embedding rule, then must learn whether the rule can apply recursively or not. However, direct experience of recursive embedding is rare in the input. A study of recursive nominal modification in Spanish show children acquire different types of modification (possession, part-whole relations) at different times even if these are expressed with the same preposition de. This suggest that the domain of rule formulation is narrower than syntactic category (PPs) or even lexical particle (de). Bilingual children show delays in acquiring a first level of embedding rule but not in allowing the rule to be recursive. This suggests that learning recursive modification is not sensitive to the concomitant reductions in input in bilingual contexts. I argue that children learn that embedding rules are recursive by inference from the productivity of simple embedding rules. The evidence on the acquisition of recursive nominal modification points to the limitations of the parameter setting model of syntactic development.
Keywords: modification, recursion, syntactic development, Spanish, productivity, DP
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.UG then and now: How generative approaches neglected grammatical learning
  • 3.Recursion as a learning problem
  • 4.Acquiring recursive NP modification in Spanish
    • 4.1Recursion in child language
    • 4.2NP internal modifiers in Spanish
    • 4.3The complexity and recursion project
    • 4.4The Colombia study
    • 4.5The bilingual study
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.02per
References
Antonsen, Karoline & Romina Farhang
2018 The effect of PP type on recursive modification. Poster presented at the meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, May 30-June 1.
Berko, Jean
1958 The child’s learning of English morphology. WORD 14(2–3). 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Patricia J. & Michael Tomasello
1999 How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language 75(4). 720–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Jean Berko
1960 Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development 31(1). 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. ISBN: 3-11-017279-8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1959 A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1). 26–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Holland: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life inlLanguage, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve
1995 The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Sarita, Teresa Ukrainetz, Jennifer Hsu, Joan Kaderavek, Laura Justice, & Ronald Gillam
2008 Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 39. 145–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson
2009 The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L.
2005 Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46. 621–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh
2010 The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Janet
1998 Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Futrell, Richard, Laura Stearns, Daniel L. Everett, Steven T. Piantadosi & Edward Gibson
2016 A corpus investigation of syntactic embedding in Pirahã. PLOS ONE 11. e0145289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R.
1990 The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1 (1). 3–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R., Kimberly Cassidy, Rebbeca Nappa, Anna Papafragou & John C. Trueswell
2005 Hard words. Language learning and development 1(1). 23–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
1982 The resilience of recursion. In Eric Wanner & Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 51–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Anna Gavarró, Joke de Lange & Claudia Caprin
2008 Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition 15(2). 89–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz & Julien Musolino
2016 Endogenous sources of variation in language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(4). 942–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1991 Artikel und Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In Armin von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2012 Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system. Language 88. 732–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leguin, Ursula
2017 No time to spare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Lidz, Jeff, Susan Waxman & Jennifer Freedman
2003 What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned. Cognition 89(3). B65–B73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1991 How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Limbach, Maxi & Dani Adone
2010 Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 34. 281–90.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2018 Principles, parameters, and schemata: A radically underspecified UG. Linguistic Analysis 41 (3). 517–557.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Sugumaran Vijayan, S. Bandi Rao & Peter M. Vishton
1999 Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283(5398). 77–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. & Gwin F. Wachtel
1988 Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20. 121–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moreira-Rodríguez, Antonia
2006 ‘The book on the table’, ‘The nan in the moon’: Post-modification of nouns by preposition + noun in English and Castilian. Bulletin of Spanish Studies 83(1). 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues
2009 Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85. 355–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ninio, Anat
2011 Syntactic development, its input and output. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pannemann, Maren
2007 DP acquisition as structure unravelling. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.
Paradis, Johanne & Fred Genesee
1996 Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (1). 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Lisa & Jeff Lidz
2013 Parameters in language acquisition. In Cedruc Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, 129–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Barbara Zurer, Sylvia C. Fernandez, & D. Kimbrough Oller
1993 Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers. Language Learning 43 (1). 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., & Anny P. Castilla-Earls
2016 Adquisición del español como lengua materna. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, 213–230. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar & Diane Massam
2012 Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition 19. 301–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Tyler Peterson, Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar, Diane Massam & Yves Roberge
2018 The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs. Language 94. 332–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Erin Pettibone & Anny Castilla-Earls
2017 Down two steps: Are bilinguals delayed in the acquisition of recursively embedded PPs? Matraga (Aquisição da Linguagem) 24(41). 393–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge
2014 Development of noun phrase complexity in children. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Insight Grant Program. SSHRC: 435-2014-2000.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Yves Roberge, Alex Lowles, & Petra Schulz
2021. Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursive embedding: The case of possession in German. Language Acquisition. Crossref
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Castilla-Earls, María Fernanda Lara Díaz, & Erin Pettibone
In preparation. La adquisición de estructuras nominales complejas. University of Toronto.
Pesetsky, David
2009 Against taking linguistic diversity at face value. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 462–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pettibone, Erin
In preparation. The acquisition of (non)restrictive adjectives. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.
Picallo, Carme
2012 Structure of the noun phrase. In Jose Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 263–284. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pine, Julien M. & Elena V. M. Lieven
1997 Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics 18. 123–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Yves Roberge, Danielle Thomas, Ana T. Pérez- Leroux, & Nelleke Strik
2014 Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(3). 495–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Stephen
1984 Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge
2018 A way into recursion. In Hollebrandse, Bart, Jaieun Kim, Ana T. Pérez-Leroux, & Petra Schulz (Eds.), UMOP 41: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar (T.O.M. and grammar): A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper, 109–122. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Roberge, Yves, Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Anna Frolova
2018 On recursive modification in L1 French. Languages 3 (6). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, Tom
2011 The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5. 57–86Google Scholar
Roeper, Tom & William Snyder
2005 Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation, 155–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, Tom & Jill G. de Villiers
2011 The acquisition path for wh-questions. In Jill G. de Villiers & Tom Roeper (eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 189–246. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport
1996 Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 274. 1926–1928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli
2006 On the semantic markedness of phi features. In Daniel Habour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across modules and interfaces, 57–82. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli & Hans-Martin Gärtner
2007 Interfaces + recursion = language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Ed. Payot.Google Scholar
Sneed German, Elisa
2008 Input in the acquisition of genericity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.
Snyder, William
2007 Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, William, Ann Senghas & Kelly Ihnman
2001 Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 9(2).157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Syrett, Kristen & Jeff Lidz
2009 QR in child grammar: Evidence from antecedent-contained deletion. Language Acquisition 16. 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, Elin
2014 The typical development of simultaneous bilinguals. In Johanne Paradis and Therese Grüter (eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development, 141–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2000 Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74. 209–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, Sharon
2014 Comparing the role of input in bilingual acquisition across domains. In Johanne Paradis & Therese Grüter (eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development, 181–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valian, Virginia, Stephanie Solt & John Stewart
2009 Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae: The case of children’s determiners. Journal of Child Language 36(4). 743–778. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel
2017 NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93. 799–826. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles
2002 Knowledge and learning in natural language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Universal Grammar, statistics, or both. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(10). 449–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 For and against frequencies. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 287–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar