Chapter published in:
Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 57–78

Chapter 3
Definite determiners in Romance

The role of modification

| Concordia University
The definite article in Eastern Romance (ER) is overtly expressed as a suffix on the noun. However, with objects of prepositions (Ps) the definite article can be null, unless the P object is modified, in which case the definite article must be overt. In order to account for this variation in the overtness of the definite article, I propose that definite Ds must undergo M-merge in ER and that the definite D is spelled out overtly only if D M-merges with a head that bears a definiteness ([def]) feature. ER languages display micro-variation with respect to which particular item in the DP can host the definite article, and with respect to whether the definite article in unmodified objects of Ps must, or simply can, be null. Micro-variation is accounted for by (i) the feature content of the Number head, and (ii) whether the M-merge rule applies strictly locally or not.
Keywords: Eastern Romance, prepositions, definiteness, modifiers, M–merge, spell-out, definiteness spread
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Existing literature
  • 3.Theoretical background
    • 3.1Features
    • 3.2Prepositions
    • 3.3Nominal phases and their peripheries
    • 3.4The number phrase
    • 3.5Adjectives
  • 4.Proposal
    • 4.1M-merge
    • 4.2Spell-out
  • 5.Implementation of the analysis
    • 5.1Num heads and the expression of definiteness
      • 5.1.1Num1: [uN],[ua:]/EPP
      • 5.1.2Num2: [uN],[ua:]/EPP,[uc:+]
      • 5.1.3Num3: [uN],[uc:+]/EPP
      • 5.1.4Num4: [uN]/EPP,[uc:+]
    • 5.2Romanian
    • 5.3Megleno-Romanian and Istro-Romanian
    • 5.4Northern Aromanian (NAr)
    • 5.5Southern Aromanian (SAr)
    • 5.6To sum up
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.03isa
References
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001 Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics today 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Hector
2005 Noun modification, pseudo-articles, and last resort operations in Arvantovlaxika and in Romanian. Lingua 115: 311–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cândroveanu, Hristu
1977 Antologie de proză aromână. Bucharest: Editura Univers.Google Scholar
Capidan, Theodor
1935 Meglenoromânii – Dicṭionar meglenoromân, Volume 3. Bucharest: Cultura Naṭională/ Academia Română. Studii şi Cercetări XXV.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In David Michaels Martin & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Gugliemo
2010 The Syntax of Adjectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra
2004 Relative Adjectives. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 6 (1): 50–73.Google Scholar
2005 Romanian demonstratives and minimality. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 7(1): 102–116.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Alexandru Nicolae
2009 On the syntax of Romanian definite phrases. Changes in the patterns of definiteness checking. In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change, 193–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Nominal Peripheries and phase structure in the Romanian DP. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 56(1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Anca Dinu
2013 Adjectives and specificity. Revue roumaine de linguistique 58(4): 455–480.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Ion Giurgea
2006 The Suffixation of Definite Articles in Balkan Languages. Revue roumaine de linguistique 51. 73–104.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
2005 At the left periphery of the Romanian noun phrase. In Martine Coene & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), On space and time in language, 23–49. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell: Malden.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1985 On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Luis
2009 A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford, OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mardale, Alexandru
2006 Why on table is on the table? Notes on the definite article’s incorporation with prepositions in Romanian. In Beata Gyuri (ed.), Proceedings of the First Central Europe Student Conference in Linguistics, 1–12. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2006 Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37:69–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2001 T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 Tense, Case and the Nature of Syntactic Categories. In Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, and Alexander Lecarme (eds.), The Syntax of Time, 495–538. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & E. Torrego
2007 The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saramandu, Nicolae
2007 Aromâna vorbită în Dobrogea. Bucharest: Editura academiei române.Google Scholar
Saramandu, Nicolae, Marilena Tiugan, Irina Floarea & Alina Celac
2011 Dicționar meglenoromân. Fonetică şi dialectologie, 30. 51–115. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
Tănase-Dogaru, Mihaela
2012 The Syntax of Quantity and Quality in Romanian. Bucharest: Editura Universității.Google Scholar
Teodorescu, Alexandra
2006 Adjective ordering restrictions revisited. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 25), 399–407. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tomic, Olga
2006 Balkan Sprachbund Morphosyntactic Features. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zegrean, Iulia-Georgiana
2012 Balkan Romance: Aspects on the Syntax of Istro-Romanian. Venice, Italy: Università Ca’Foscari Venezia dissertation.