Chapter published in:
Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics: Papers selected from the 48th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 48), Toronto, 25-28 April 2018
Edited by Gabriela Alboiu and Ruth King
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 360] 2022
► pp. 111–126

Chapter 6
Same EPP, different null subject type

| University of Toronto
| University of Toronto
It is commonly assumed that all languages with Extended Projection Principle (EPP) type X will have null subject language (NSL) type Y, and vice versa (see Holmberg 2005, inter alia). We argue that although EPP type and NSL type interact, they are not co-extensive. We demonstrate that General Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, and French have different NSL types (consistent, partial, and non-NSLs, respectively), but share the same EPP type (DP EPP). We also argue that both Brazilian Portuguese and Dominican Spanish underwent a change in EPP type, followed by the loss of agreement and a change in NSL type. Crucially, EPP type and NSL type did not change simultaneously. It therefore follows that EPP and NSL type cannot be co-extensive.
Keywords: null-subject languages, EPP, loss of agreement, Spanish, Brazilian Portuguese, French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background on the EPP
    • 1.2Background on NSLs
  • 2.Different NSL type, same EPP
    • 2.1Consistent vs partial NSL types
      • 2.1.1Portuguese
      • 2.1.2Spanish
    • 2.2EPP type
      • 2.2.1French
      • 2.2.2General Spanish
      • 2.2.3Brazilian Portuguese
  • 3.Synchronic and diachronic variation
    • 3.1Diachronic variation
      • 3.1.1Goiás BP
      • 3.1.2Dominican Spanish
    • 3.2Synchronic variation
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 10 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.360.06don
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
1998 Parametrizing agr: Word order, v-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
2009 Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 2–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Pro-drop and theories of pro in the Minimalist Program Part 1: Consistent null subject languages and the pronominal-agr hypothesis. Language and Linguistics 5(8). 551–570.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar, Maria Duarte & Mary Aizawa Kato
2005 Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4. 11–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2010 Semi null-subject languages, expletives, and expletive pro reconsidered. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 153–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
2008 Subject, tense and verb movement in Germanic and Romance. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3. 24–43.Google Scholar
Bilgin, Çağrı
2017 Synchro-diachronic approach to null subjects: An account of null subject language diversity and associated diachronic change. Toronto: University of Toronto MA forum paper.Google Scholar
Borges, Humberto & Acrisio Pires
2017 The emergence of Brazilian Portuguese: Earlier evidence for the development of a partial null subject grammar. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 2(31). 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Chris
2016 Three kinds of locative preposing. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 36.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian syntax. Reidel: Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera-Puche, Maria
2008 Null subject patterns in language contact: The case of Dominican Spanish. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.
Camacho, José
2006 Do subjects have a place in Spanish? In Chiyo Nishida & Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (eds.), New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Volume I: Morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL). Austin, Texas, February 2005, 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 The null subject parameter revisited: The evolution from null subject Spanish and Portuguese to Dominican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary Aizawa Kato & Francisco Ordóñez, (eds.) The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 27–48. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corr, Alice
2015 Overt expletives in Ibero-Romance: A diachronic and diatopic perspective. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 60 (2–3). 205–222.Google Scholar
Costa, João
2010 PB e PE: orientação para o discurso importa? [BP and EP: Does discourse orientation matter?] Estudos de Línga(gem) 8(1). 123–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William & Stanley Dubinsky
2001 Functional architecture and the distribution of subject properties. In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.). Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 247–279. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doner, Julianne
2019 The EPP across languages. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
Goodall, Grant
2001 The EPP in Spanish. In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.). Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality, 193–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2000 Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi, The acquisition of syntax: Studies in comparative developmental linguistics, 129–169. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2013 The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130. 88–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005 Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu & Michelle Sheehan
2009 Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63. 59–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary Aizawa
1999 Strong pronouns, weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11. 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Brazilian Portuguese and Caribbean Spanish: Similar changes in Romania Nova. In Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change, 117–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kattan-Ibarra, Juan & Christopher Pountain
2003 Modern Spanish grammar: A practical guide. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, Ruth, France Martineau & Raymond Mougeon
2011 The interplay of internal and external factors in grammatical change: First person plural pronouns in French. Language 87(3). 470–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane & Carolyn Smallwood
1997 Essential features of predication in English and Niuean. In Kiyomi Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 27, 263–272. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Union, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia
2012 An account of variation in the rates of overt subject pronouns in Romance. Spanish in Context 9(3). 420–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naves, Rozana, Eloisa Pilati & Heloise Salles
2013 ‘As cidades da Amazônia chovem muito’: sujeitos não temáticos e as propriedades de INFL no Português do Brasil. [‘The cities of the Amazon rain a lot’: Non-thematic subjects and the properties of INFL in Brazilian Portuguese.] Abstract. Paper presented at the Portuguese Linguistics in the United States (PLUS) Conference, Athens, GA, November 14–16. https://​portugueselinguistics​.files​.wordpress​.com​/2013​/11​/plus​-program​-abstracts​-nov7​.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2018.
Pöll, Bernhard
2015 Caribbean Spanish = Brazilian Portuguese? Some comparative thoughts on the loss of pro-drop. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8(2). 317–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc & Theresa Biberauer
2005 Explaining expl . In Marcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, 115–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010 Varieties of French and the null subject parameter. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 303–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene
2004 Impoverished morphology and a-movement out of case domains. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.
Ross, John
1982 Pronoun deleting processes in German. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , San Diego, CA, December 27–30.
Sheehan, Michelle
2007 The EPP and null subjects in romance. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Newcastle University dissertation.
2016 Subjects, null-subjects and expletives in Romance. In Susann Fischer & Cristoph Gabriel (eds.). Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance ( Manuals of Romance Linguistics 10), 329–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios & Irene Philippaki-Warburton
2001 ‘Subject’ and EPP in Greek: The discontinuous subject hypothesis. Journal of Greek Linguistics 2. 149–186.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
2003 The lexical preverbal subject in a Romance null subject language: Where are thou? In Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds.), A Romance perspective on language knowledge and use: Selected papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Chicago, 19–22 April 2001, 341–357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toribio, Almeida Jacqueline
2000 Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 110(5). 315–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012 Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16(1). 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar