References
Balusu, Rahul
2005Distributive reduplication in Telugu. In Christopher Davis, Amy Rose Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-six annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 36), 39–53. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Beghelli, Filippo & Tim Stowell
1997Distributivity and negation: The syntax of each and every. In Anna Szabolsci (ed.), Ways of scope taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2010Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry 41(2). 287–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cable, Seth
2014Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in Tlingit (and beyond). Language 90. 562–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choe, Jae-Woong
1987Anti-quantifiers and a theory of distributivity. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
Corr, Alice
2018Old Ibero-Romance reduplicated numerals and distance distributivity. Workshop on (Co-)Distributivity 2018, Université Paris 8, France 22–23 February.Google Scholar
2019Distributive reduplication in Old Spanish numerals. Talk given at Department of Spanish and Portuguese, University of California, Los Angeles. 12 March.
Cuervo, María Cristina
2003Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Demonte, Violeta
1995Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus 7(1). 5–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donazzan, Marta & Ana Lúcia Müller
2015Reduplicated numerals as pluractionals: Distributivity as a window to the individuation of events. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 14. 95–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, Ray
1992Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gil, David
1988Georgian reduplication and the domain of distributivity. Linguistics 26. 1039–1066. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Distributive numerals. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 226–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
1997The categorial status of determiners. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–123. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in honour of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995Subjects, events, and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
2002Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation 2. 29–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Hyun Kyoung Jung
2015In support of the P have analysis of the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry 46(4). 703–730. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horcajada Diezma, Baustista & Pedro Sánchez-Prieto Borja
1999La reduplicación distributiva del numeral y el arabismo morfosintáctico en el romance hispánico medieval. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 115. 280–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1993Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection, Studia Linguistica 47. 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics 4(2). 14. 201–225.Google Scholar
Morujão, Maria do Rosário Barbosa
2010Testamenti ecclesiae portugaliae, 1071–1325. Lisbon: Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Ouwayda, Sarah
2014Where number lies: Plural marking, numerals, and the collective-distributive distinction. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.
Pineda, Anna
2013Double object constructions and dative/accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: A unified account. Borealis. 2(1). 57–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, Anna & Carles Royo
2017Differential indirect object marking in Romance (and how to get rid of it). Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62(4). 445–462.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
1974On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Joao Pedro
1798Observações históricas e críticas. Lisbon: Academia Real das Sciencias de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Safir, Ken & Tim Stowell
1988Binominal each. In J. Blevins & J. Carter (eds.), Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 18, 426–450. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Prieto Borja, Pedro & Bautista Horcajada Diezma
1994La reduplicación del numeral en textos medievales: ¿una estructura distributiva en castellano antiguo? Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 110. 146–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva Villar, Luis
2015Origen de las estrategias distributivas por reduplicación en espanol y portugués antiguos. European Scientific Journal, Special Edition Volume 1, 191–199.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
2013Binominal each: A DP that may not be. In Kook-Hee Gil, Stephen Harlow & George Tsoulas (eds.), Strategies of quantification, 260–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torres Morais, Maria Aparecida & Heloisa Maria Lima-Salles
2016The external possessor construction in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordóñez (eds), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 204–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Roger
2010Bilingualism and diglossia in medieval Iberian (350–1350). In Fernando Cabo Aseguinolaza, Anxo Abuín González & César Domínguez (eds.), A comparative history of literatures in the Iberian Peninsula, 333–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2002Boys buying two sausages each: On the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar