References
Barner, David & Jesse Snedeker
2005Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97(1). 41–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron & Roberta Pires de Oliveira
2014Brazilian bare phrases and referentiality: Evidences from an experiment. Revista Letras 90(2). 253–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron, Suzi Lima & Roberta Pires de Oliveira
2016Bare Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental study on grinding. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 11(1). 2. 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny Sandra
1997Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Giralt, Nuria, & Paul Bloom
2000How special are objects? Children’s reasoning about objects, parts, and holes. Psychological Science 11(6). 497–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan
1965Linguistics and English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott & Beth Levin
2012Who has more furniture? An exploration of the bases for comparison. Paper presented at Communication au colloque Massif/comptable en linguistique, philosophie et sciences, Paris, France, December 19–21.
Gutheil, Grant, Paul Bloom, Nohemy Valderrama & Rebecca Freedman
2004The role of historical intuitions in children’s and adults’ naming of artifacts. Cognition 91(1). 23–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Suzi
2014The grammar of individuation and counting. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
2019Processing coercion in Brazilian Portuguese: grinding objects and packaging substances. In Katy Carlson, Charles Clifton, Jr. & Janet Dean Fodor (eds.), Grammatical approaches to language processing – Essays in honor of Lyn Frazier, 209–224. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lima, Suzi Oliveira & Ana Paula Quadros Gomes
2016The interpretation of Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars in neutral contexts. Revista Letras 93. 193–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menuzzi, Sérgio de Moura, Maria Cristina Figueiredo Silva & Jenny Doetjes
2015Subject bare singulars in Brazilian Portuguese and information structure. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 14(1). 7–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oggiani, Morgas C.
2011On discourse referential properties of bare singulars in Spanish. Utrecht, Netherlands: Utrecht University Master’s thesis.
Paraguassu-Martins, Nize & Ana Müller
2007A distinção contável-massivo e a expressão de número no sistema nominal. Revista Delta 23. 65–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey
1979Non-singular reference: some preliminaries. In Francis Jeffrey Pelletier (ed.), Mass terms: Some philosophical problems, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2014Dobras e redobras do singular nu: costurando a semântica através das línguas. Porto Alegre: EDIPUC-RS.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Luisandro Mendes De Souza
2013‘O singular nu e a comparação: uma proposta de derivação semântica’. Revista LinguíStica 9(1). 31–54.Google Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Susan Rothstein
2011Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121(15). 2153–2175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santana, Raíssa Silva & Elaine Grolla
2018The acceptability of subject bare singulars in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista LinguíStica 14. 194–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
2011Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Suzi Lima, Kevin Mullin & Brian Smith (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), Volume 2, 661–678. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Students Association, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Shipley, Elizabeth F., & Barbara Shepperson
1990Countable entities: Developmental changes. Cognition 34(2). 109–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, Mahesh, Eleanor Chestnut, Peggy Li & David Barner
2013Sortal concepts and pragmatic inference in children’s early quantification of objects. Cognitive psychology 66(3). 302–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike & Joan Maling
2005Beers, kaffi, and schnaps: Different grammatical options for restaurant talk coercions in three Germanic languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17(1). 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar