Cover not available
Part of
Keys to the History of English: Diachronic linguistic change, morpho-syntax and lexicography
Edited by Thijs Porck, Moragh S. Gordon and Luisella Caon
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 363] 2024
► pp. 120–141

Some philological implications of punctuation in editions of Middle English texts

| University of Gothenburg
This study investigates the use of editions with modernised punctuation for linguistic enquiries. While previous studies have highlighted potential qualitative issues with using such editions, this study provides a quantitative analysis in order to give insight into how often editions with modernised punctuation tend to deviate from their manuscript’s punctuation. By doing so, this study provides further insight into how frequently the use of such editions may potentially lead the linguistic scholar astray. This study reveals that a high proportion of the punctuation marks encountered in the studied editions have no corresponding mark in the manuscript, ultimately concluding that the use of such editions may have an impact on the current understanding of Middle English syntax and text interpretation.
Keywords: punctuation, historical, modernisation, editing, Middle English, quantitative
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief history of punctuation
  • 3.Modernised punctuation: Uses, practices and complications
  • 4.Method and materials
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Punctuation in use
    • 5.2Removals, additions, and correspondences
    • 5.3Correspondences in translation
    • 5.4Sentence-external marks
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.363.06ned
References (62)
References
Allen, C. L. 1977. Topics in diachronic English syntax (3110) [doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts]. Doctoral Dissertations 1896 – February 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
Allen, H. E. 1931. English writings of Richard Rolle, hermit of Hampole. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Baldwin, S. R. & J. M. Coady. 1978. Psycholinguistic approaches to a theory of punctuation. Journal of Reading Behavior 10(4). 363–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F. 1972. Middle English religious prose. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Brie, F. 1913. Zwei mittelenglische Prosaromane: The sege of Thebes und The sege of Troye. Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 130 (40–56). 269–285. Druck und verlag von George Westermann. [URL]Google Scholar
Brown, E. 1986. The knight’s tale, 2639: Guilt by punctuation. The Chaucer Review 21(2). 133–141.Google Scholar
Brown Meech, S. 1935. Early application of Latin grammar to English author(s). Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 50(4). 1012–1032. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calle Martín, J. & A. Miranda García. 2005. Editing Middle English punctuation. The case of MS Egerton 2622 (ff. 136–152). International Journal of English Studies 5(2). 27–44. [URL]Google Scholar
Clemoes, P. 1952. Liturgical influence on punctuation in Late Old English and Early Middle English manuscripts. Occasional Papers 1. 3–22.Google Scholar
Donatus, A. 1857. Grammatici latini: Vol. 4: Probi Donati Servii qvi fervntvr De arte grammatica libri (H. Keil, ed.). Teubner. [URL]Google Scholar
Early English Text Society. (n.d.). Guidelines for editors. Early English Text Society. [URL]
Evans, J. & M. S. Serjeantson. 1933. English mediaeval lapidaries. Humprey Milford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman & W. van der Wurff. 2004. The syntax of early English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, V. & A. Hudson. (eds.). 2013. Probable truth. Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffin, N. E. 1907. The Sege of Troye. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 22(1). 157–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 2013. Editing texts with extensive manuscript traditions. In V. Gillespie & A. Hudson (Eds.), Probable truth, 111–129. Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Editing medieval texts. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
2019. Extending the Index of Printed Middle English Prose. The Mediaeval Journal 9(1). 41–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrtage, S. J. H. 1879. The early English version of the Gesta Romanorum. N. Trübner. [URL]Google Scholar
Horstman, C. 1895. Yorkshire writers: Richard Hampole; an English father of the Church and his followers. S. Sonnenschein; Macmillan. [URL]Google Scholar
Humez, A. & N. Humez. 2008. On the dot: The speck that changed the world. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isidore of Seville. 2006. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville (S. A. Barney, W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach & O. Berghof, trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Jajdelska, E. 2007. Silent reading and the birth of the narrator. University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, H. 1926. Notes on the study of English punctuation of the sixteenth century. The Review of English Studies 2(6). 152–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keiser, G. R. 1984. The Middle English ‘Boke of Stones’: The southern version. Omirel.Google Scholar
Kroch, A., A. Taylor & B. Santorini. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki parsed corpus of Middle English (PPCME2), 2nd edn., release 4 [CD-ROM]. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]Google Scholar
Levinson, J. P. 1985. Punctuation and the orthographic sentence: A linguistic analysis [Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1675). Plain, and short rules for pointing periods, and reading sentences grammatically, with the great use of them … n.p. [URL]Google Scholar
Lewis, R. E., N. F. Blake & A. S. G. Edwards. 1985. Index of printed Middle English prose. Garland.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1896. An introduction to Latin textual emendation based on the text of Plautus (A. Mahoney, ed.). Macmillan; Perseus Digital Library. [URL]Google Scholar
Lowth, R. 1762/1799. A short introduction to English grammar with critical notes. R. Aitken. [URL] (Original work published 1762)Google Scholar
Machan, T. W. 1994. Textual criticism and Middle English texts. University Press of Virgina.Google Scholar
Madden, F. (ed.). 1838. The Old English versions of the Gesta Romanorum. W. Nicol, Shakespeare Press.Google Scholar
Martens, S., K. Beck & T. Zastrow. 2012/2020. Linguistic tools: Automatic segmentation and annotation tools. In CLARIN-D AP 5, CLARIN-D User Guide, version 1.1. 73–95. CLARIN-D. [URL] (Original work published 2012)Google Scholar
McCarren, V. P. & D. Moffat. (eds.). 1998. A guide to editing Middle English. The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1980. The dangers of disguise: Old English texts in modern punctuation. The Review of English Studies 31(124). 385–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
n.a. 1790. A collection of ordinances and regulations… John Nicols. [URL]
Nedelius, S. 2021. Changed perspectives: On modernised punctuation in Middle English texts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Parkes, M. B. 1992. Pause and effect. Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Partridge, E. 1953. You have a point there: A guide to punctuation and its allies. Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Perry, G. G. 1867. Religious pieces in prose and verse. N. Trübner. [URL]Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of classical scholarship. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, S. & A. Taylor. 2006. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Probert, P. & S. Roussou. 2019. The invention of the Greek prosodic signs. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 139. 125–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, F. N. 1957. The works of Geoffrey Chaucer, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Robinson, I. 1998. The establishment of modern English prose in the Reformation and the Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santorini, B. 2016. Annotation manual for the Penn Historical Corpora and the York-Helsinki Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]Google Scholar
Schou, K. 2007. The syntactic status of English punctuation. English Studies 88(2). 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. J. 2020. Transforming early English. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steele, R. 1922. The earliest arithmetics in English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swaen, A. E. H. 1943. The booke of hawkyng after prince Edwarde Kyng of Englande and its relation to the book of St Albans. Studia Neophilologica 16(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. & S. Pintzuk. 2012. The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. J. Lopez-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 47–65. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A., A. Warner, S. Pintzuk & F. Beths. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki parsed corpus of Old English prose (YCOE). Oxford Text Archive; Oxford Text Archive. [URL]Google Scholar
The British Museum. 1834. Catalogue of manuscripts in the British Museum. Part I. The Arundel manuscripts. The Trustees. [URL]
The Interedition Development Group. 2010–2019. CollateX. [URL]
Thomson, D. 1984. An edition of the Middle English grammatical texts. Garland.Google Scholar
Thrax, D. 2016. Dionysius Thrax: Grammar (J. Braarvig & A. Nesøen, trans.). Bibliotheca Polyglotta Graeca et Latina. [URL]Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1997. The Penguin guide to punctuation. Penguin.Google Scholar
Ullmann, J. 1884. Studien zu Richard Rolle of Hampole. Englische Studien 7. 415–472. [URL]Google Scholar
Warner, R. 1791. Antiquitates culinariae; or, curious tracts relating to the culinary affairs of the old English. R. Blamire, Strand. [URL]Google Scholar
Wingo, O. E. 1972. Latin punctuation in the classical age. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. & J. O. Halliwell. 1841/1845. Reliquiae antiquae. Scraps from ancient manuscripts, illustrating chiefly early English literature and the English language, vol. 1. J.R. Smith. [URL] (Original work published 1841)Google Scholar