The unfinished double glosses in Durham Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19

Langmuir, Christopher

doi:10.1075/cilt.363.07lan

Part of

Keys to the History of English: Diachronic linguistic change, morpho-syntax and lexicography
Edited by Thijs Porck, Moragh S. Gordon and Luisella Caon
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 363] 2024
► pp. 144–165

The unfinished double glosses in Durham Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19

Christopher Langmuir | University of Seville

Incomplete multiple glosses are a prominent feature of Aldred’s glossing practice in the Lindisfarne Gospels (Cotton MS Nero D IV). In his later gloss, that to Durham Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19, incomplete double glosses are predominant. Their raison d´être is unclear. This paper addresses the range of functions represented by vel (‘or’) in Durham Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19. It is argued that the appended vel of incomplete glosses may carry a vel potius (‘or rather’) value thereby alerting readers to the provisional character of the gloss. Inspection of the manuscript reveals that in many instances insufficient space has been allowed for any second gloss. Incomplete glosses must also be considered in the context of how the same lemmata are glossed elsewhere in the manuscript.

Keywords: Aldred, Durham Ritual, Durham Collectar, gloss, Old English, Lindisfarne Gospels, Northumbrian, vel

Article outline

1.Introduction
- 1.1Incomplete Multiple Glosses in Li. and Durham, MS A.iv.19
2.Remedial glosses in Li.
3.Remedial glosses in Durham, MS A.iv.19
4.Vel as caveat lector
5.Vel and the vacant slots
6.Potential alternatives for unfinished glosses
7.Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Notes
References
Appendix

Published online: 4 April 2024

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.363.07lan

References (23)

References

Beeby, A., R. Gameson, C. Nicholson, & A. W. Parker. 2017. Aldred’s red gloss. In R. Gameson (Ed.), The Lindisfarne Gospels: New perspectives, 200–205. Brill.

Bosworth, J. & T. N. Toller. 1882–1898. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Clarendon; T. N. Toller (ed.). 1908–1921. Supplement to An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary based on manuscript collections of the late Joseph Bosworth. Clarendon.

Brooks, S. 2016. Variation in Aldred’s gloss. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 103–152. Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, M. P. 2016. ‘A good woman’s son’: Aspects of Alfred’s agenda in glossing the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 13–36. Mouton de Gruyter.

Brown, T. J. (ed.). 1969. The Durham Ritual: A southern English collectar of the tenth century with Northumbrian additions. Rosenkilde and Bagger.

Cavill, P. 2016. Maxims in Aldred’s marginalia to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 79–101. Mouton de Gruyter.

Corrêa. A. (ed.). 1992. The Durham Collectar. Boydell & Brewer.

DOE = Dictionary of Old English: A–I online. A. di Paolo Healey, J. Holland, I. McDougall, & P. Mielke (eds.). Toronto University Press. [URL]

Fernández Cuesta, J. 2016. Revisiting the manuscript of the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 257–285. Mouton de Gruyter.

Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.

Jolly, K. L. 2012. The community of St. Cuthbert in the late tenth century: The Chester le-Street additions to Durham Cathedral Library A.IV.19. Ohio State University Press.

Jolly, K. 2016. The process of glossing and glossing as process: Scholarship and education in Durham, Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 361–375. Mouton de Gruyter.

Keefer, S. L. 2007. Use of manuscript space for design, text and image in liturgical books owned by the community of St Cuthbert. In S. L. Keefer & R. H. Bremmer, Jr. (eds.), Signs on the edge: Space, text and margin in medieval manuscripts, 85–115. Peeters.

Kuhn, S. M. 1947. Synonyms in the Old English Bede. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 46(2). 168–176.

Lendinara, P. 2016. The ‘unglossed’ words of the Lindisfarne glosses. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 329–359. Mouton de Gruyter.

Marsden, R. 2017. The text of the Lindisfarne Gospels. In R. Gameson (Ed.), The Lindisfarne Gospels: New perspectives, 183–199. Brill.

Nagucka, R. 1997. Glossal translation in the Lindisfarne Gospel according to Saint Matthew. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31. 179–201.

OLD = Glare, P. (ed.) 2012. Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.

Pons-Sanz, S. M. 2016. A study of Aldred’s multiple glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (Eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 301–328. Mouton de Gruyter.

Ross. A. S. C. 1932. The errors in the Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. The Review of English Studies 8(32). 385–394.

Ross, A. S. C. & A. Squires. 1980. The multiple, altered and alternative glosses of the Lindisfarne and Rushworth Gospels and the Durham Ritual. Notes and Queries 225. 489–495.

Stanley, E. 2017. The Lindisfarne Gospels: Aldred’s gloss. In R. Gameson (Ed.), The Lindisfarne Gospels: New perspectives, 206–219. Brill.

Thompson, A. H., & U. Lindelöf (eds.). 1927. Rituale Ecclesiae Dunelmensis: The Durham Collectar. A New and Revised Edition of the Latin Text with the Interlinear Anglo-Saxon Version (Publications of the Surtees Society 140). Durham.