Cover not available
Part of
Keys to the History of English: Diachronic linguistic change, morpho-syntax and lexicography
Edited by Thijs Porck, Moragh S. Gordon and Luisella Caon
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 363] 2024
► pp. 191–211

Loss of wiþer-words in English

| University of Warsaw
| University of Warsaw
The element wiþer is documented in Old English as a separate lexeme and a prefix. Altogether, Bosworth-Toller’s An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary records 69 wiþer-lexemes, which implies that wiþer- was relatively productive and flexible. Generally, wiþer- was added to words with the sense of ‘against’; in rare cases, it denoted ‘in return or compensation’ and ‘in the opposite direction’ (OED). Curiously, the majority of wiþer-lexemes are not recorded in Middle English: merely 24 words occur in MED. The aim of this study is to account for the loss of wiþer-lexemes. Potential causes are linguistic, such as low frequency and the similarity of the prefix wiþer- to wiþ-, and extra-linguistic, including competition with foreign items and changes in pragmatic associations of the words.
Keywords: Old and Middle English lexis, wiþer, loss of words, corpus study, causes of demise
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Aims
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Old English lexemes
  • 6.Middle English
  • 7.Causes of the loss of wiþer-words
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.363.09syl
References (28)
References
Anthony, L. 2022. AntConc, version 4.2.0 [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL]Google Scholar
A Thesaurus of Old English. [URL]
B-T= Bosworth, J. & T. N. Toller. 1898. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. [URL]Google Scholar
Bator, M. 2010. Obsolete Scandinavian loanwords in English. Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Cichosz, A., P. Pęzik, M. Grabski, S. Karasińska, M. Adamczyk, P. Rybińska, & A. Ostrowska (eds.). 2022. A frequency dictionary of Old English prose for learners of Old English and historical linguists. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CMEPV = Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. [URL]
De Greef, L. 1982. The growth of the ME lexicon: 1100–1500 [Unpublished dissertation]. University of KU Leuven.Google Scholar
de Smet, H. 2017. Entrenchment effects in language change. In H.-J. Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning, 75–100. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekeyser, X. 1991. Romance loans in Late Middle English: A case study. In S. Granger (Ed.), Perspectives on the English lexicon: A tribute to Jacques van Roey, 153–162. Peeters.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, X. & L. Pauwels. 1990. The demise of the Old English heritage and lexical innovation in Middle English. Two intertwined developments. Leuvense Bijdragen 79. 1–23.Google Scholar
Dike, E. B. 1935. Obsolete English words: Some recent views. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 34(3). 351–365.Google Scholar
DOE = Dictionary of Old English. [URL]
DOEC = di Paolo H., Holland, A. J., McDougall I. & Mielke, P. (eds.). 2009. Dictionary of Old English Corpus in electronic form. DOE Project 2009.
Hemken, E. 1906. Das Aussterben alter Substantive im Verlaufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte. Fiencke.Google Scholar
Historical Thesaurus of English. [URL]
Kopaczyk, J. & H. Sauer. 2017. Binomials in the history of English. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, I. 1968. Repetitive word pairs in Old and Middle English prose. Expressions of the type whole and sound and answered and said, and other parallel constructions. University of Turku.Google Scholar
Markus, M. 1992–1997. The Innsbruck Corpus of Middle English Prose. CD-Rom version. University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
MED = Middle English Dictionary. [URL]
Oberdörfer, W. 1908. Das Aussterben altenglischer Adjektive und ihr Ersatz im Verlaufe der englischen Sprachgeschichte. Druck von H. Fiencke.Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. [URL]
Robinson, F. C. 1972. The devils account of the next world: An anecdote from Old English homiletic literature. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73 (1/3). 362–371.Google Scholar
Rothwell, W. 1998. Anglo-Norman at the (green)grocer’s. French Studies 52. 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauer, H. 1992. Nominalkomposita im Frühmittelenglischen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott-Macnab, D. & K. A. Gilbertson 2014. Unrecorded Middle English lexical items in the fifteenth-century treatise, Medicines for horses: A preliminary study. Notes and Queries 61(3). 344–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sylwanowicz, M. 2018. Middle English names of medical preparations. Towards standard medical terminology. Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
Sylwanowicz, M. & A. Wojtyś. 2020. The adversary or the devil? Semantic analysis of wiþer-nouns in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55. 119–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, O. 2017. Lexical loans and their diffusion in Old English: Of ‘gospels’, ‘martyrs’, and ‘teachers.’ Studia Neophilologica 89(2). 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar