2013. Bibliographie. In Histoire de la langue anglaise, ► pp. 177 ff.
Lowrey, Brian & Fabienne Toupin
2010. L'invariant à l'épreuve de la diachronie1. Corela :8-2
PARGMAN, SHERI
2004. GULLAHDUHAND PERIPHRASTICDOIN ENGLISH DIALECTS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. American Speech 79:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003. Syntactic Change,
Roger Lass
2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language,
Rissanen, Matti
2000. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 187 ff.
Roberts, Ian
1995. Object Movement and Verb Movement in Early Modern English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31], ► pp. 269 ff.
Roberts, Ian
2017. Inertia. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 425 ff.
Hope, By Jonathan
1990. APPLIED HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS: SOCIO‐HISTORICAL LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE FOR THE AUTHORSHIP OF RENAISSANCE PLAYS1. Transactions of the Philological Society 88:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
KOMA, OSAMU
1988. The auxiliary do in eighteenth-century English: A sociohistorical-linguistic approach. By INGRID TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE. (Geschiedenis van de taalkunde.) Dordrecht: Foris, 1987. Pp. x, 257. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 5:0 ► pp. 361 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.