Historical and Comparative Linguistics
In any course of historical and comparative linguistics there will be students of different language backgrounds, different levels of linguistic training, and different theoretical orientation. This textbook attempts to mitigate the problems raised by this heterogeneity in a number of ways. Since it is impossible to treat the language or language family of special interest to every student, the focus of this book is on English in particular and Indo-European languages in general, with Finnish and its closely related languages for contrast. The tenets of different schools of linguistics, and the controversies among them, are treated eclectically and objectively; the examination of language itself plays the leading role in our efforts to ascertain the comparative value of competing theories. This revised edition (1989) of a standard work for comparative linguists offers an added introduction dealing mainly with a semiotic basis of change, a final chapter on aspects of explanation, particularly in historical and human disciplines, and added sections on comparative syntax and on the semiotic status of the comparative method.
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6] 1989. xv, 462 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Introduction
|
ix
|
|
Part I. Background: genetic linguistics in relation to general linguistics and related fields
|
|
|
1. Language and linguistics
|
3
|
|
2. Writing and language
|
31
|
|
3. Linguistic variation
|
47
|
|
Part II. Historical linguistics: how does language change
|
|
|
4. Sound change
|
57
|
|
5. Grammar change: analogy
|
88
|
|
6. Rule change
|
109
|
|
7. Semantic change
|
133
|
|
8. External change: borrowing
|
154
|
|
9. Why does language change? Social and linguistic factors
|
179
|
|
Part III. Comparative linguistics (general notions and structure): how can change be reversed?
|
|
|
10. Preliminaries to the historical methods
|
207
|
|
11. The comparative method (the central concept)
|
229
|
|
12. Internal reconstruction
|
264
|
|
13. Conclusion to the methods
|
274
|
|
Part IV. Linguistic reconstruction: A synthesis of various linguistic and cultural notions
|
|
|
114. Dialect geography
|
289
|
|
15. Alternative relationship models
|
300
|
|
16. Classification of languages
|
310
|
|
17. Philology and etymology
|
323
|
|
18. Reconstructing Phonology
|
335
|
|
19. Reconstructing grammar
|
351
|
|
20. Reconstructing semology/semantics
|
364
|
|
Part V. Conclusion: linguistics as part of anthropology
|
|
|
21. Change and reconstruction in culture and linguistics
|
377
|
|
22. Genetic linguistics and biological genetics
|
389
|
|
23. Genetic linguistics and metatheory
|
399
|
|
Bibliography
|
413
|
|
Index
|
449
|
“The book remains an outstanding introduction, revealing the author's depth of knowledge and original thought, opening fascinating perspectives while informing adequately and reliably.”
Edgar C. Polomé, in The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1996
“This book provides a thorough introduction to genetic linguistics for those who are already trained in other areas of linguistics. It successfully demonstrates that genetic linguistics is full of issues in need of investigation, and is thus very much alive.”
Colette van Kerckvoorde, in Language, 1990.
Cited by
Cited by 110 other publications
No author info given
2001. Commentary.
Linguistic Typology 5:2-3 
No author info given
2016.
In Sequential Voicing in Japanese [Studies in Language Companion Series, 176],
No author info given
2017.
In Development of Tense/Aspect in Semitic in the Context of Afro-Asiatic Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 337],
No author info given
2017.
In The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics: A Handbook for Language Teaching,
► pp. 744 ff.
Abraham, Elyse K., Raimo Anttila, M. Lionel Bender, William Bright, Daniel R. Davis, David S. Fagan, Eduardo D. Faingold, Grazia Crocco Galèas, Michiya Kawai, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Robert Le Page, Stephen Matthews, Inge B. Milfull, Stephen O. Murray, Nick Nicholas, Charles Peck, Edgar C. Polomè, Lori Repetti, L. H. Rolfe, W. Wilfried Schuhmacher, W. Wilfried Schuhmacher, Jyh Wee Sew, J. J. Spa, J. J. Spa, John Stonham & Yuri Tambovtsev
1997. Reviews.
<i>WORD</i> 48:3 ► pp. 397 ff.
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
2016. Word and pattern morphology: An information-theoretic approach.
Word Structure 9:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Adamska-Sałaciak, Arleta
1998. Jan Baudouin De Courtenay’s contribution to Linguistic Theory.
Historiographia Linguistica 25:1-2 ► pp. 25 ff.
Aikio, Ante, Václav Blažek, Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy, Harold C. Fleming, Masataka Ishikawa, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Donna L. Lillian, Olga M. Mladenova, Heidi Quinn, Solomon I. Sara, Andrew L. Sihler, Thomas Stolz, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Chaoqun Xie & Elly van Gelderen
2003. Reviews.
<i>WORD</i> 54:3 ► pp. 401 ff.
Anttila, Arto
2008.
In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,
► pp. 206 ff.
Anttila, Arto & Vivienne Fong
2004. Variation, ambiguity, and noun classes in English.
Lingua 114:9-10 ► pp. 1253 ff.
Anttila, Raimo
1992. Review of Nerlich (1990): Change in Language: Whitney, Bréal, Wegener.
Diachronica 9:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Bakro-Nagy, M.
2005. The Uralic Language Family. Facts, Myths and Statistics.
Lingua 115:7 ► pp. 1053 ff.
Bell Canon, Elizabeth
2019. Linguistic ideology and the pre-modern English Bible.
Translation and Interpreting Studies 14:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Boberg, Charles
2009. The emergence of a new phoneme: Foreign (a) in Canadian English.
Language Variation and Change 21:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Bowern, Claire
2006.
In Linguistic Areas,
► pp. 244 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005.
In Lexicalization and Language Change,
Bubenik, Vit
1992. Review of Shapiro (1991): The Sense of Change: Language as history.
Diachronica 9:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Burridge, Kate
2012. Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and Seventh Ages.
Lexis :7
Coetser, Attie
1997. Afrikaanse leksikale elemente in Xhosa.
South African Journal of Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Costello, John R.
1995. Theory and data in phonological reconstruction: Whence and whither?.
<i>WORD</i> 46:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Davis, Wayne A.
2002.
In Meaning, Expression and Thought,
de Chene, Brent
2016. Description and explanation in morphophonology: the case of Japanese verb inflection.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
De Smet, Hendrik
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 23 ff.
DURKIN, PHILIP
2018. Exploring the penetration of loanwords in the core vocabulary of Middle English: carry as a test case.
English Language and Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Elias, Alexander
2019. Visualizing the Boni dialectswith Historical Glottometry.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 70 ff.
Embleton, Sheila
1991. Review of Ogura (1990): Dynamic Dialectology: A study of language in time and space.
Diachronica 8:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Enger, Hans-Olav
2019. In defence of morphomic analyses.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Epps, Patience
2015. Review of Carlin & van de Kerke (2010): Linguistics and archaeology in the Americas: The historicization of language and society.
Diachronica 32:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Faarlund, Jan Terje
2000. Review of Lass (1997): Historical linguistics and language change.
Studies in Language 24:1 ► pp. 175 ff.
Fertig, David
2016. Mechanisms of paradigm leveling and the role of universal preferences in morphophonological change.
Diachronica 33:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren & Charlotte Maekelberghe
2018. Competing motivations in the diachronic nominalization of English gerunds.
Diachronica 35:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Gardani, Francesco
2021. On how morphology spreads.
Word Structure 14:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Gerner, Matthias
2019.
In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348],
► pp. 502 ff.
Gerritsen, Marinel
1992. Deflection in Flemish between the 13th and 20th centuries: An interplay between analogical and articulatory factors.
Language Variation and Change 4:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Giannakis, George
1992. Review of Koivulehto (1991): Uralische Evidenz für die Laryngaltheorie.
Diachronica 9:2 ► pp. 297 ff.
Goldstein, D. M.
2020.
Homeric ‐
phi(n)
is an oblique case marker1
.
Transactions of the Philological Society 118:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
González Cruz, María Isabel & María del Pilar González de la Rosa
2006. Language and Travel: Spanish Vocabulary in British Travel Books.
Journal of Iberian and Latin American Studies 12:2-3 ► pp. 203 ff.
Goossens, Louis
1995.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 323 ff.
Griffiths, Devin
2017. The Comparative Method and the History of the Modern Humanities.
History of Humanities 2:2 ► pp. 473 ff.
Griffiths, Devin
2019. The Comparative Method and the History
of the Modern Humanities.
Tekstualia 3:54 ► pp. 5 ff.
Guignard Guion, Susan
1998. The Role of Perception in the Sound Change of Velar Palatalization.
Phonetica 55:1-2 ► pp. 18 ff.
Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire & April McMahon
2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365:1559 ► pp. 3829 ff.
Hlongwane, J. B.
1995. Growth of the Zulu language and its structural changes.
South African Journal of African Languages 15:2 ► pp. 60 ff.
Holm, Hans J.
2007. The new arboretum of Indo-European “trees”. Can new algorithms reveal the phylogeny and even prehistory of Indo-European?*.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 14:2-3 ► pp. 167 ff.
Honkola, T, O Vesakoski, K Korhonen, J Lehtinen, K Syrjänen & N Wahlberg
2013. Cultural and climatic changes shape the evolutionary history of the Uralic languages.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26:6 ► pp. 1244 ff.
Honkola, Terhi, Kalle Ruokolainen, Kaj J. J. Syrjänen, Unni-Päivä Leino, Ilpo Tammi, Niklas Wahlberg & Outi Vesakoski
2018. Evolution within a language: environmental differences contribute to divergence of dialect groups.
BMC Evolutionary Biology 18:1
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003.
In Grammaticalization,
Huang, Tsung-shueng & Shelley Ching-yu Depner
2016.
In Embodiment in Language (II),
► pp. 161 ff.
Huang, Xiaojiang, Xiaojun Wan & Jianguo Xiao
2014. Comparative news summarization using concept-based optimization.
Knowledge and Information Systems 38:3 ► pp. 691 ff.
HUUMO, TUOMAS
2010. Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: The case of the Finnish object.
Journal of Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Huumo, Tuomas
2020. Layers of (un)boundedness: The aspectual–quantificational interplay of quantifiers and partitive case in Finnish object arguments
.
Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 905 ff.
Itkonen, Esa
2019.
In Normativity in Language and Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209],
► pp. 29 ff.
Jacobs, Haike & Janine Berns
2013.
In Research on Old French: The State of the Art [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 88],
► pp. 107 ff.
Johansson, Niklas & Gerd Carling
2015. The de-iconization and rebuilding of iconicity in spatial deixis.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 47:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
Joseph, Brian D.
2016.
In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336],
► pp. 37 ff.
Juul Nielsen, Peter
2017. Elisa Mattiello, Extra-grammatical morphology in English (= Topics in English Linguistics 82).
Word Structure 10:2 ► pp. 256 ff.
Kalyan, Siva, Alexandre François & Harald Hammarström
2019. Problems with, and alternatives to,the tree model in historical linguistics.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
KAUHANEN, HENRI
2017. Neutral change.
Journal of Linguistics 53:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
Kauhanen, Henri
2020. Replicator–mutator dynamics of linguistic convergence and divergence.
Royal Society Open Science 7:11 ► pp. 201682 ff.
Ke, Jinyun
2006. A cross-linguistic quantitative study of homophony*.
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 129 ff.
Keidan, Artemij, Leonid Kulikov & Nikolaos Lavidas
2020. Morphosyntactic isoglosses in Indo-European: An introduction.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 373 ff.
Koch, Harold
2014.
In Language Description Informed by Theory [Studies in Language Companion Series, 147],
► pp. 153 ff.
Kodubovska, Oksana
2018. LATIN BORROWINGS DENOTING AN INHABITED PLACE IN ENGLISH AND GERMAN: HISTORICAL ASPECT.
Odessa Linguistic Journal :12 ► pp. 61 ff.
Koyama, Wataru
2003. How to do historic pragmatics with Japanese honorifics.
Journal of Pragmatics 35:10-11 ► pp. 1507 ff.
Koyama, Wataru
2004. The linguistic ideologies of modern Japanese honorifics and the historic reality of modernity.
Language & Communication 24:4 ► pp. 413 ff.
Köhnlein, Björn
2018. Apparent exceptions to final devoicing in High Prussian: A metrical analysis.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:4 ► pp. 371 ff.
Lepage, Yves
2015.
In Language Production, Cognition, and the Lexicon [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 48],
► pp. 151 ff.
Leppänen, V.
2016. LEHMANN, CHRISTIAN: Thoughts on Grammaticalization..
Kratylos 61:1 ► pp. 210 ff.
Leppänen, Ville
2019.
In Normativity in Language and Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209],
► pp. 183 ff.
Leppänen, Ville & Tommi Alho
2018. On The Mergers Of Latin Close-Mid Vowels.
Transactions of the Philological Society 116:3 ► pp. 460 ff.
Mallory, Fintan
2021. The Case Against Linguistic Palaeontology.
Topoi 40:1 ► pp. 273 ff.
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis
1993. On Illič-Svityč's Nostratic Theory.
Studies in Language 17:1 ► pp. 205 ff.
Matos, Maria Amelia & Maria de Lourdes Passos
2010. Emergent verbal behavior and analogy: Skinnerian and linguistic approaches.
The Behavior Analyst 33:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Matos, Maria Amelia & Maria de Lourdes R. da F. Passos
2006. Linguistic sources of Skinner’s verbal behavior.
The Behavior Analyst 29:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Mäkilähde, Aleksi, Ville Leppänen & Esa Itkonen
2019.
In Normativity in Language and Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209],
► pp. 1 ff.
Nesset, Tore
2000. Iconicity and prototypes: A new perspective on Russian verbs of motion.
Scando-Slavica 46:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova
2014. Testing the Semantic Homogeneity Constraint.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Nicolaï, Robert
2017.
In Signifier. Essai sur la mise en signification,
Orr, Robert
2008. Duck-Hunting in Anger?.
Canadian Slavonic Papers 50:1-2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Pearson, Christopher H.
2019. Are homologies really natural kinds?.
Biology & Philosophy 34:4
Picard, Marc
2009. La fréquence d’emploi et le changement phonologique irrégulier en québécois.
Revue québécoise de linguistique 20:1 ► pp. 157 ff.
Poibeau, Thierry
2017. Modèles d’évolution et d’échanges entre langues : notes sur quelques débats récents concernant la famille ouralienne.
Études finno-ougriennes :48
Prevost, Sophie
2006. Grammaticalisation, lexicalisation et dégrammaticalisation : des relations complexes.
Cahiers de praxématique :46 ► pp. 121 ff.
Rabanus, Stefan
2019.
In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map,
► pp. 1 ff.
Rabanus, Stefan
2020.
In Handbook of the Changing World Language Map,
► pp. 103 ff.
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky
2014.
In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327],
► pp. 3 ff.
Robbeets, Martine & Walter Bisang
2014.
In Paradigm Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 161],
► pp. 1 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019.
In The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present,
Ruiz Narbona, Esaúl
2019.
In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348],
► pp. 218 ff.
Schoenbrun, David L.
1993. We Are What We Eat: Ancient Agriculture Between the Great Lakes.
The Journal of African History 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Schwink, Frederick W.
1997. Review of Fox (1995): Linguistic Reconstruction: An introduction to theory and method.
Diachronica 14:1 ► pp. 124 ff.
Shields, Kenneth
1997. The Gothic Genitive Plural in -ē Revisited.
American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
Shyldkrot, Hava Bat-Zeev
2005.
In Perspectives on Language and Language Development,
► pp. 9 ff.
Sims-Williams, Helen
2016. Analogical Levelling and Optimisation: The Treatment of Pointless Lexical Allomorphy in Greek.
Transactions of the Philological Society 114:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Sims-Williams, Helen & Hans-Olav Enger
2021. The loss of inflection as grammar complication.
Diachronica 38:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Szczesniak, Konrad
2016.
In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54],
► pp. 121 ff.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2009. Typological parameters of intralingual variability: Grammatical analyticity versus syntheticity in varieties of English.
Language Variation and Change 21:3 ► pp. 319 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali
2008.
In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,
► pp. 729 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2013.
In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,
► pp. 128 ff.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2018.
Near done; awful stable; really changing.
Diachronica 35:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Ten Wolde, Elnora
2018.
In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205],
► pp. 170 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001.
In Regularity in Semantic Change,
Unger, J. Marshall
2014.
In Paradigm Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 161],
► pp. 177 ff.
Volker, Craig Alan
2015.
In Education in Languages of Lesser Power [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 35],
► pp. 1 ff.
W. Hill, Nathan
2014. Grammatically Conditioned Sound Change.
Language and Linguistics Compass 8:6 ► pp. 211 ff.
Weifeng, Han & Shi Dingxu
2014. The Evolution ofɦi23kã34(‘he says’) in Shanghainese.
Language and Linguistics 15:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
Winters, Margaret E.
2020.
In Historical Linguistics,
Yule, George
2005.
In The Study of Language,
Zuckermann, Ghil‘ad
2006. A NEW VISION FOR ISRAELI HEBREW.
Journal of Modern Jewish Studies 5:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
ŞİMŞEK, Ramazan
2021. YABANCI DİL OLARAK TÜRKÇE EĞİTİMİNDE KULLANILAN MATERYALLERİN AKADEMİK SÖZ VARLIĞI BAKIMINDAN DERLEM TABANLI İNCELENMESİ.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General