Article published in:
Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics
Edited by Sylvia M. Adamson, Vivien A. Law, Nigel Vincent and Susan Wright
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65] 1990
► pp. 537
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Denison, David
1999.  In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Fischer, Olga
1995. New directions in English historical grammar. Neophilologus 79:1  pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
Kiparsky, Paul
1996.  In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 38],  pp. 140 ff. Crossref logo
Roger Lass
2000.  In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Crossref logo
Neels, Jakob
2015. The history of the quasi-auxiliary use(d) to . Journal of Historical Linguistics 5:2  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Nordlinger, Rachel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to. English Language and Linguistics 1:2  pp. 295 ff. Crossref logo
Rissanen, Matti
2000.  In The Cambridge History of the English Language,  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001.  In Regularity in Semantic Change, Crossref logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Henry Smith
1993. Arguments from language change. Journal of Linguistics 29:2  pp. 431 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.