Article published in:
Conversation Analysis in Chinese: Part II
Edited by Ni-Eng Lim
[Chinese Language and Discourse 10:2] 2019
► pp. 224240
References
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Paul Drew
1979Order in court. Oxford Socio-Legal Studies. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Yanrong
(2004) “Courtroom questioning as a culturally situated persuasive genre of talk.” Discourse & Society, 15(6), 705–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jianfu
2013Criminal law and criminal procedure law in the People’s Republic of China: Commentary and legislation, trans. by Suiwa Ke. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2001 “Answers and Evasions.” Language in Society, 30(3): 403–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Agency in response: The role of prefatory address terms.” Journal of Pragmatics, 571, 290–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard; Haspelmath, Martin and Bickel, Balthasar
2008 “The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses.” Retrieved from https://​www​.eva​.mpg​.de​/lingua​/pdf​/Glossing​-Rules​.pdf
Congressional-Executive Commission on China
Conley, John and William O’Barr
1990Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1992 “Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape.” In Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1977Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Alan Sheridan, trans. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, Meizhen
2012 “Courtroom discourse in China.” In The Oxford handbook of language and law, ed. by Peter M. Tiersma and Lawrence M. Solan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory
2008 “You Might Win the Battle but Lose the War: Multimodal, Interactive, and Extralinguistic Aspects of Witness Resistance.” Journal of English Linguistics, 36(3), 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConville, Mike and S. Choongh
2011Criminal justice in China: An empirical inquiry. Edward Elgar. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, eds. 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi
2010 “Transformative answers: One way to resist a question’s constraints.” Language in Society, 391, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法
[Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xingshi Susong Fa) Amended 2012) Promulgated by the National People’s Congress, March 14 2012)] Retrieved from http://​www​.gov​.cn​/flfg​/2012​-03​/17​/content​_2094354​.htm
中国庭审公开网
China Open Trial Proceedings Online (Zhongguo Tingshen Gongkai Wang), Accessed 2016 December 6.] Retrieved from http://​tingshen​.court​.gov​.cn/
最高人民法院工作报告
2018) [The Supreme People’s Court Work Report (Zuigao Renmin Fayuan Gongzuo Baogao) 2018.] Retrieved from http://​www​.court​.gov​.cn​/zixun​-xiangqing​-87832​.html
北京高级人民法院工作报告
(2018) [Beijing Gaoji Renmin Fayuan Gongzuo Baogao (Beijing Supreme People’s Court Work Report) (2018).] Retrieved from http://​zhengwu​.beijing​.gov​.cn​/jh​/t1508582​.htm
孟新爱:法庭问话中合作原则违反与信息获取《怀化学院学报》。
2010年10期 1–3页[Meng, Xin’ai. 2009. “The violation of the cooperation principle and information access in court questioning.” Journal of Huaihua University, 101: 1–3.]Google Scholar
廖美珍:中国法庭互动话语对应结构研究。《语言科学》
2003 年9 月第 2 卷第5期(总第6期) 77 一 89 页。 [Liao, Meizhen. 2003. “Research on the structure of exchange in interactive discourse in Chinese courts.” Yuyan Kexue. 2(5): 77–89.]Google Scholar
廖美珍:中国法庭互动话语
formulation 现象研究 《外语研究》 Foreign Languages Research 2006 年第 2 期总第 96 期 [Liao, Meizhen. 2006. “Research on the phenomenon of formulation in Chinese courtroom interaction.” Foreign Languages Research 96.]Google Scholar
廖美珍. 答话研究——法庭答话的启示[J]. 修辞学习
2004(05):29–34. [Liao, Meizhen. 2004. “Research on Response: Lesson on Courtroom Response.” Xiuci Xuexi. 51: 29–34.]Google Scholar
孙亚迪与廖美珍:法庭解述话语现象的生成机制研究。《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2017年04期。 [Sun, Yadi and Meizhen Liao. 2017. “Research on the generation mechanism for the phenomenon of courtroom formulation.” Hubei University Bulletin (Philosophy and Social Sciences Version), 41.]Google Scholar
张丽萍与金孝柏:刑事法庭上的合作交际研究:法官一被告人庭审会话分析。《广东外语外贸大学学报》
2004 年7月第15卷第3期。 [Zhang, Liping and Xiaobo Jin. 2004. “Research on cooperative exchange in criminal court: courtroom conversation analysis of the judge and defendant.” Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. 15(3) 43–46.]Google Scholar
张志铭:审判方式改革再思考。《法学研究》
1995 第四期。 [Zhang, Zhiming. 1995. “A Further Thought on the Reform of the Trial Process.” Studies in Law (Faxue Yanjiu) 41: 93–96.]Google Scholar
高 华:刑事法庭调查中的填表式问句初探《语言教学与研究》
2003 年第4 期37–44页。 [Gao, Hua. 2003. A preliminary exploration of fill-in-the-blank style questions in criminal trial investigation. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu. Vol. 41, 37–44.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar