Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:2 (2020) ► pp.287–305

On the translation of Japanese politeness into Cantonese

A case study of anime

 | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
This paper utilizes the reconstructive nature of translation to examine how formal (neutral and honorific) and plain forms of Japanese are represented in Cantonese dubbing with the aim of exploring some common politeness features of Cantonese that the translator adopts in order to compensate for the difference between the two languages. Address terms that do not exist in the Japanese original, for example deferential terms and kinship terms, are inserted in Cantonese dubbing to represent different speech levels of Japanese. This paper further argues that such inserted address terms help to realize politeness by either recognizing the superior status of addressees or by including an addressee as an in-group member. Some cases of insertions also suggest strategic adoption of address terms in Cantonese. In addition to observing social norms and addressing each other appropriately, Cantonese speakers can also exploit address terms strategically to achieve specific pragmatic goals.
Keywords: translation, dubbing, politeness, Japanese, Cantonese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 24 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.19009.shi
References (30)
References
Bassnett, Susan. 2007. “Culture and Translation.” In A Companion to Translation Studies, ed. by Piotr Kuhiwczak, and Karin Littau. 13–23. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chor, Winnie. 2018. “Sentence Final Particles as Epistemic Modulators in Cantonese Conversations: A Discourse-Pragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 1291: 34–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1996. “Japanese Language Socialization: Indexing the Modes of Self.” Discourse Process 221: 171–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Reanalysis of Discernment from a Social Constructivist Perspective: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities.” Accessed August 1, 2019. [URL]
. 2006. “Japanese Politeness as an Interactional Achievement: Academic Consultation Sessions in Japanese Universities.” Multilingual 251: 269–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Cintas, Jorge, and Aline Remael. 2007. Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Hiroko. 1995. T-shirt Japanese Versus Necktie Japanese: Two Levels of Politeness. Translated by Charles De Wolf. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern China.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 234–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason. 2000. “Politeness in Screen Translating.” In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti. 430–445. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2005. “The Importance of ‘Place’ in Japanese Politeness: Implications for Cross-cultural and Intercultural Analysis.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (1): 41–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. “Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 101: 347–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 2006. “Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 338–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness.” Multilingua 8 (2–3): 223–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2019. “Politeness and Impoliteness in Chinese Discourse.” In Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. by Chris Shei. 203–215. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sara Mills. 2013. “Rethinking Discernment.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (2): 133–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Leung, Wai Mun. 2010. On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Sentence-Final Particles. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten. 2005. Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Megumi, Maeri. 2002. “The Switching between desu/masu Form and Plain Form: From the Perspective of Turn Construction.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics (Vol. 101), ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, and Susan Strauss. 206–219. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.Google Scholar
Niyekawa, Mitsue Agnes. 1995. Minimum Essential Politeness: A Guide to The Japanese Honorific Language. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2000. Politeness in Chinese Face-to-face Interaction. Stamford: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara. 2003. “Re-examining Politeness, Face and the Japanese Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1471–1506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosales Sequeiros, Xosé. 2002. “Interlingual Pragmatic Enrichment in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics. 341: 1069–1089. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, Frederic C. 2004. “Synchronization in Dubbing: A Traditional Approach.” In Topics in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Pilar Orero. 36–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Virginia, and Stephen Matthews. 2017. Intermediate Cantonese: A Grammar and Workbook. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Keiko Todo & Tingting Xiao
2024. Revisiting the binary view of honorifics in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.