Managing a suspended course of action
A multimodal study of suoyi ‘so’-prefaced utterances in Mandarin conversation
This study explores interactional functions of the connective suoyi ‘so’ and its
particular role in organizing talk and activity in Mandarin conversation. Adopting the methodologies of
conversation analysis, multimodal analysis, and interactional linguistics, this study examines 14 hours of
naturalistic face-to-face Mandarin conversation. An examination of the data shows that in addition to marking
results and conclusions, suoyi is also used to preface an utterance as a tying device to
manage suspensions, where progressivity of a course of action is halted. Specifically,
suoyi-prefaced utterances can be used to return to a pre-prior course of action at the
possible completion of a side sequence or frame. When performing the function of return,
suoyi-prefaced utterances facilitate the development of the main course of action.
This study contributes to our understanding of the interactional uses of linking adverbials from a
cross-linguistic perspective.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Suoyi and suoyi-clauses in Mandarin conversation
- 3.Methodology and data
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
References
References (62)
References
Biq, Yung-O. 1995. “Chinese Causal Sequencing and Yinwei in Conversation and Press Reportage.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 211: 47–62. 

Bolden, Galina. 2006. “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56 (4): 661–688. 

Bolden, Galina. 2009. “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998. 

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2001. “Introducing Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 1–22. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dong, Weiguang. 1999. “句势在复句分类中的地位 [The Statuses of Sentence Structures in the Categories of Complex Sentences].” 语言研究 [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 21: 37–40.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1998. “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language in Society 27 (4): 495–522. 

Fang, Mei. 2000. “自然后语中弱化连词的话语标记功能 [Reduced Conjunctions as Discourse Markers].” 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 51: 459–470.
Fang, Mei. 2012. “会话结构与连词的浮现义 [Discourse Structure and Emergent Meaning of Conjunctions].” 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 61: 575–585.
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 272–302. 

Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press: London.
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Gestures as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 621: 29–49. 

Goodwin, Charles. 2017. Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press. 

Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage. 1990. “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1): 283–307. 

Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Goodwin. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin. 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 

Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, and Tania Kuteva. 2016. “On insubordination and cooptation.” In Insubordination, edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe. 39–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Heinemann, Trine. 2017. “Transitioning between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token Nå.” Journal of Pragmatics 1181: 1–21. 

Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. 299–345: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 1994. “Constituting and Maintaining Activities Across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. 

Hoey, Elliott. 2015. “Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (4): 430–453. 

Holt, Elizabeth. 2010. “The Last Laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1513–1525. 

Holt, Elizabeth, and Paul Drew. 2005. “Figurative Pivots: The use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (1): 35–61. 

Houtkoop, Hanneke, and Harrie Mazeland. 1985. “Turns and Discourse Units in Everyday Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 9, no. 5, 595–619. 

Howe, Mary Locke. 1991. Topic Change in Conversation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas.
Jefferson, Gail. 1972. “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David Sudnow. 294–338. New York: Free Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about A Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. 191–222. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Alison. 2002. “So…?: Pragmatic Implications of So-prefaced Questions in Formal Police Interviews.” In Language in the Legal Process, edited by Janet Cotterill. 91–110. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press. 

Kitzinger, Celia. 2013. “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 229–256. Oxford University Press, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell.
Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Xiaoting. 2016. “Some Discourse-Interactional Uses of Yinwei ‘because’ and its Multimodal Production in Mandarin Conversation.” Language Sciences 581: 51–78. 

Li, Xiaoting. 2019. “Researching Multimodal Chinese Interaction: A Methodological Account.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, edited by Xiaoting Li and Tsuyoshi Ono. 181–212. Berlin: Boston: De Gruyter. 

Liao, Qiuzhong. 1986. “现代汉语篇章中的连接成分 [the Connective Elements in Modern Chinese Discourse].” 中国语文 [Studies of Chinese Language] 61: 413–427.
Local, John, and Gareth Walker. 2005. “Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organisation and phonological structures of spontaneous speech.” Phonetica 621: 120–130. 

Local, John, and Gareth Walker. 2004. “Abrupt-Joins as a Resource for the Production of Multi-Unit, Multi-Action Turns.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1375–1403. 

Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. 现代汉语八百词 [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. 商务印书馆 [Beijing: Commercial press].
Mazeland, Harrie. 2007. “Parenthetical Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 10, 1816–1869. 

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2004. “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone “So” in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. 

Robinson, Jeffrey. 2013. “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 257–280. Oxford, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.
Rossano, Federico. 2013. “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 308–329. Oxford, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50, no. 4: 696–735. 

Scheflen, Albert. 1964. “The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems.” Psychiatry 27 (4): 316–331. 

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1982. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, edited by Deborah Tannen. 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson. 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Schegloff, Emanuel. 2002. “Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap and Turn-Taking.” In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner. 287–321. New York: Plenum Press.
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg R. Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, et al.. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 101: 353–402.
Seuren, Lucas, Mike Huiskes, and Tom Koole. 2016. “Remembering and Understanding with Oh-Prefaced Yes/no Declaratives in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 1041: 180–192. 

Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell. 2005. “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica (1561): 1–20. 

Su, Danjie. 2016. “Grammar Emerges through Reuse and Modification of Prior Utterances.” Discourse Studies, 18(3). 330–353. 

Xing, Fuyi. 2003. 现代汉语 [Standard Chinese]. 华中师范大学出版社 [Huazhong Normal University Publishing House].
Yao, Shuangyun. 2009. “口语中“所以”的语义弱化与功能拓展 [Semantic Reduction and Function Expansion of “suoyi” in Spoken Chinese].” 汉语学报 [Chinese Linguistics] (31): 16–23.
Yao, Shuangyun. 2015. “连词与口语语篇的互动性 [Conjunctions and Interactivity of Spoken Discourses].” 中国语文 [Studies of Chinese Language] (41): 329–340.
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. 语法讲义 [Lectures on Grammar]. 商务印书馆 [Beijing: Commercial Press].
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rautiainen, Iira, Pentti Haddington & Antti Kamunen
2023.
Nudging Questions as Devices for Prompting Courses of Action and Negotiating Deontic (A)symmetry in UN Military Observer Training. In
Complexity of Interaction,
► pp. 217 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.