Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:2 (2020) ► pp.169197
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
1990Pragmatic word order in English composition. In U. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 43–65). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Google Scholar
Carrell, P.
1982Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 161, 479–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., & Baker, P.
2016Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 371, 849–880.Google Scholar
Chiang, S.
2003The importance of cohesive conditions to perceptions of writing quality at the early stages of foreign language learning. System, 311, 471–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, U.
1990Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international persuasive student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 241, 67–87.Google Scholar
Crossley, S., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D.
2016aThe tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 481, 1227–1237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bThe development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 321, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
2011Shared features of L2 writing: Intergroup homogeneity and text classification. Journal of Second Language Writing, 201, 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 2, 115–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S., Yang, H. S., & McNamara, D.
2014What’s so simple about simplified texts? A computational and psycholinguistic investigation of text comprehension and text processing. Reading in a Foreign Language, 26(1), 92–113.Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
1990Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 71, 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckes, T.
2008Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability. Language Testing, 25(2), 155–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D.
1994Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 281, 414–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, L., Crossley, S., & McNamara, D.
2013Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 181, 218–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R.
1976Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Harman, R.
2013Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 221, 125–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jiang, W.
2013Measurements of development in L2 written production: The case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics, 341, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y. J.
2005Written narratives as an index of L2 competence in Korean EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 141, 259–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C., & Thorp, D.
2007A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds), IELTS collected papers: Research in speaking and writing assessment (pp. 316–377). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knoch, U.
2007‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence. Assessing Writing, 12(2), 108–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
2011Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 201, 148–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
2014Rating written performance: What do raters do and why? Language Testing, 311, 329–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 341, 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., & Gilabert, R.
2010Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–99). Eurosla: European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Li, S.
2014The gap in the use of lexical cohesive devices in writing between native Chinese speakers and second language users. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 49(3), 25–47.Google Scholar
Li, T., & Wharton, S.
2012Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 111, 345–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, M., & Braine, G.
2005Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System, 331, 623–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCulley, G.
1985Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 191, 269–282.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D.
1996A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 81, 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D.
2001Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 551, 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., Crossley, S., & McCarthy, P.
2010Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 271, 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., Crossley, S., & Roscoe, R.
2013Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 451, 499–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W.
1996Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., & Kintsch, W.
1996Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 141, 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neuner, J.
1987Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 211, 92–105.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D.
2007Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 431, 121–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, J.
1992A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 79–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R.
2005Generalizability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Vergeer, M., & Eiting, M.
1997The assessment of writing ability: Expert readers versus lay readers. Language Testing, 14(2), 157–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
1984Spoken and written narrative in English and Greek. In D. Tannen (Ed.). Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 21–41). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Weigle, S. C.
2007Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 194–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witte, S., & Faigley, L.
1981Coherence, cohesion, and writing ability. College Composition and Communication, 321, 189–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.
2013Textual conjunctives and topic-fronting devices in CFL learners’ written summaries. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 48(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
Yang, W., & Sun, Y.
2012The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 231, 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar