Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 6:2 (2015) ► pp.109132
Androutsopoulous, Jannis
2006a “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and Computer-mediated Communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4): 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b “Multilingualism, Diaspora, and the Internet: Codes and Identities on German-based Diaspora Websites.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4): 520–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles
1998 “Identity Ascriptions in their Time and Place: ‘Fagin’ and ‘The Terminally Dim.’” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Susan Widdicombe, 71–86. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun
1996Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimension of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B
2010 “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2078–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Back, Michele, and Miguel Zepeda
2013 “Performing and Positioning Orthography in Peruvian CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (2): 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard
1986Story, Performance and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Performance.” In Folklore, Cultural Performances, and Popular Entertainments, ed. by Richard Bauman, 41–49. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Verbal Art as Performance.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 165–188. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs
1990 “Poetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde
1997 “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display”. Journal of Pragmatics 271: 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald
1986 “Shared Territory: Audience, Indirection and Meaning.” Special issue of Text 6 (3): 339–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1969Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
1998Language Play. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2001Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, Brenda, and Susan Herring
(eds) 2007The Multilingual Internet: Language, Cultural and Communication Online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1987 “Po-faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics 251: 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2007 “Joking Aside: Sociopragmatic Functions of Conversational Humour in Interpersonal Communication.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap and Joanna Nijakowska, 246–268. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1986 “The Audience as Co-author: An Introduction.” Special issue of Text 6 (3): 239–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Floyd, Frank
1997 “Observation on Wanka Quechua Conjecture Marking and Subjectification.” In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and Construction of Meaning: Proceedings of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque , ed. by Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee, and Eve Sweetser, 129–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Frank, Jane
1990 “You Call that a Rhetorical Question?: Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 723–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer, Naomi
2008Discourse and Politeness: Ambivalent Face in Japanese. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2010 “Teasing and Ambivalent face in Japanese Multi-party Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2120–2130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginossar, Tamar, and Sara Nelson
2010 “Reducing the Health and Digital Divides: A Model for using Community-based Participatory Research Approach to E-heath Interventions in Low-income Hispanic Communities.” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 15 (4): 530–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2003 “Computer-mediated Communication.” In Handbook of Pragmatics (2001 Installment), ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1986 “Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation.” Special issue of Text 6 (3): 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H
1990He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
1987 “Children’s Arguing.” In Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, ed. by Susan Philips, et al., 200–248. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2010 “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2106–2119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
2004 “Computer-mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Communities.” In Designing for Virtual Community in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gary, 338–376. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hines, Christine
2000Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2000 “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies 21: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humour and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2002 “Having a Laugh at Work: How Humour Contributes to Workplace Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1683–1710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Miriam Meyerhoff
1999 “The Community of Practice: Theories and Methodologies in Language and Gender Research.” Language in Society 28 (2): 173–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
2001(1972) “On Communicative Competence.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith
2002‘“Style’ as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. by Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, and Susan Gal
2000 “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul Kroskrity, 35–83. Santa Fe: School of America Research Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
1987 “An Introduction.” Perspectives on Repetition: Special Issue of Text 71: 205–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1996 “On the Poetics of Ordinary Talk.” Text and Performance Quarterly 16 (1): 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1996 “Impoliteness and Conversational Joking: On Relational Politics.” Folia Linguistica 301: 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Elinor
1977 “Making it Last: Repetition in Children’s Discourse.” In Child Discourse, ed. by Susan Ervin-Tripp and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 125–139. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann Kring, Randall Young, and Erin Heerey
2001 “Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 1271: 229–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
La Fave, Lawrence, and Roger Mannell
1976 “Does Ethnic Humor Serve Prejudice?Journal of Communication 26 (3): 116–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Martin, and Ervin-Tripp, Susan
2006 “Risky Laughter: Teasing and Self-directed Joking among Male and Female Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 381: 51–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Kurt
2005 “Live(s) Online: Narrative Performance, Presence, and Community in” Text and Performance Quarterly 25 (4): 354–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mullany, Louise
2004 “Gender, Politeness and Institutional Power Roles: Humour as a Tactic to Gain Compliance in Workplace Business Meetings.” Multilingua 231: 13–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal
2003 “Issues in Conversational Joking.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1333–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oshima, Kimie
2000 “Ethnic Jokes and Social Function in Hawai’i.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 13 (1): 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2008 “Teasing at the White House: A Corpus-assisted Study of Face Work in Performing and Responding to Teases.” Text & Talk 281: 771–792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred Reginald
1940 “On Joking Relationships.” Africa 13 (3): 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodriquez, Amardo, and Robin Clair
1999 “Graffiti as Communication: Exploring the Discursive Tensions of Anonymous Texts.” Southern Communication Journal 65 (1): 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bamni B., and Elinor Ochs
1996 “The Microgenesis of Competence: Methodology in Language Socialization.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. by D.I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratziz, and J. Guo, 251–264. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie
2009 “Constructing Leader Identities through Teasing at Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1125–1138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragamtics? ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2007Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tholander, Michael
2002 “Cross-gender Teasing as a Socializing Practice.” Discourse Processes 341: 311–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

Chen, Zhen Troy
2020. Slice of life in a live and wired masquerade: Playful prosumption as identity work and performance in an identity college Bilibili. Global Media and China 5:3  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Zhen Troy
2021. Poetic prosumption of animation, comic, game and novel in a post-socialist China: A case of a popular video-sharing social media Bilibili as heterotopia. Journal of Consumer Culture 21:2  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Jing, Yi & Qingxin Xu
2023. Danmu video as the resemiotised: An attitudinal analysis of Home Visit. Media, Culture & Society 45:4  pp. 753 ff. DOI logo
Li, Bo, Michael L. Naraine, Liang Zhao & Chenyang Li
2023. A Magic “Bullet”: Exploring Sport Fan Usage of On-Screen, Ephemeral Posts During Live Stream Sessions. Communication & Sport 11:2  pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Lisi
2023. How humour travels in the new and dynamic mediascape: a case study of a short video platform, Little Red Book, and an online teaching platform, Rain Classroom. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Liu, Shengnan
2023. You’re so mean but I like it – Metapragmatic evaluation of mock impoliteness in Danmaku comments. Discourse, Context & Media 53  pp. 100700 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Siwen & Sijing Lu
2021. Understanding intervention in fansubbing’s participatory culture. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 67:5  pp. 620 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Rui
2022. Community-Building on Bilibili: The Social Impact of Danmu Comments. Media and Communication 10:2  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo
Xi, Ran
2023.  Watching the romance together: the affective audiences in A Dream of Splendor . Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 24:6  pp. 1104 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Hong & SungBok Park
2020. An Exploratory Study on The Effects of Using Digital Danmu on Users’ Perceived Interactivity, Viewing Engagement And Viewing Satisfaction. Journal of Digital Contents Society 21:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yuhong
2021. Making sense of the “raw meat”: A social semiotic interpretation of user translation on the danmu interface. Discourse, Context & Media 44  pp. 100550 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yuhong
2023.  Danmu as archi-text and meta-text: a semiotic analysis of online video consumption shaped by viewers’ (translational) comments . Translation Studies 16:3  pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Yuhong, Yang
2023. Participatory viewers’ engagement with the dual translation problem on the danmu interface: a social semiotic case study. Text & Talk 43:6  pp. 847 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia Tian & Daniel Cassany
2019. ‘Is it always so fast?’. Spanish in Context  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia Tian & Daniel Cassany
2021. “The murderer is him ✓”. Internet Pragmatics 4:2  pp. 272 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2020. Making sense ofdanmu: Coherence in massive anonymous chats on Discourse Studies 22:4  pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2023. From writing to drawing: Examining visual composition in danmu-mediated textual communication. Discourse, Context & Media 53  pp. 100699 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.