New poetics in China
A review of experimental Chinese literature
A new study of modern Chinese poetry has been published that deserves the attention of linguists working in both the applied and theoretical fields. The focus of the book is experimental and avant-garde literature, and as such it raises questions that are different than the ones we are accustomed to considering in the field of poetics. This review essay considers proposals for understanding poetic ability and sensibility from the point of view of applications of cognitive science.
References (24)
Barthes, Roland. 1977. “The Death of the Author.” In Image-Music-Text, ed. by Stephan Heath, 142–148. London: Fontana Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darwin, Charles. 1981[1871]. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ejxenbaum, Boris. 1971[1926]. “The Theory of the Formal Method.” In Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, ed. by Ladislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomorska, 3–37. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenollosa, Ernest, and Ezra Pound. 2008[1918]. “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry.” In The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry, a Critical Edition, ed. by Haun Saussy, Jonathan Stalling, and Lucas Klein, 41–60. New York: Fordham University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, Shui’er, Janani Sundararajan, Daniel Bowling, Jessica Lake, and Dale Purves. 2011. “Co-variation of Tonality in the Music and Speech of Different Cultures.” PLoS ONE 6 (5): 1–5. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray, and Fred Lerdahl. 2006. “The Capacity for Music: What is it and What’s Special About it?” Cognition 1001: 33–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1987. Language in Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kandinsky, Wassily. 1977[1914]. Concerning the Spiritual in Art. New York: Dover.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, Tong King. 2015. Experimental Chinese Literature: Translation, Technology, Poetics. Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerdahl, Fred. 2003. “The Sounds of Poetry Viewed as Music.” In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music, ed. by Isabelle Peretz and Robert Zatorre, 413–429. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, James J.Y. 1966. The Art of Chinese Poetry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Motokiyu, Tosa, Ojiu Norinaga, and Okura Kyojin (eds). 1997. Doubled Flowering: From the Notebooks of Araki Yasusada. New York: Roof Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paz, Octavio. 1956. El Arco y la Lira. Mexico DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shklovsky, Viktor. 1965[1917]. “Art as Technique.” In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, ed. by Lee T. Lemon and Marion Reis, 3–24. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sontag, Susan. 1961. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takanashi, Hiroko. 2007. “Orthographic Puns: The Case of Japanese Kyoka.” Humor 201: 235–259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takashi Wilkerson, Kyoko, and Douglas Wilkerson. 2000. “The Gloss as Poetics: Transcending the Didactic.” Visible Language 341: 228–262.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vargas Llosa, Mario. 2009. La Verdad de las Mentiras. Madrid: Santillana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vinograd, Richard. 2011. “Making Natural Languages in Contemporary Chinese Art.” In Xu Bing and Contemporary Chinese Art, ed. by Hsingyuan Tsao and Roger Ames, 95–115. Albany: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wirtz, Kristina. 2005. “Where Obscurity is a Virtue: The Mystique of Unintelligibility in Santería Ritual.” Language and Communication 251: 351–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xie, Ming. 1999. Ezra Pound and the Appropriation of Chinese Poetry: Cathay, Translation, and Imagism. New York: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yeh, Michelle. 2008. “There are no Camels in the Koran: What is Modern about Modern Chinese poetry?” In New Perspectives on Contemporary Chinese Poetry, ed. by Christopher Lupke, 9–26. New York: Palgrave. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Francis, Norbert
2021.
Verbal art across language and culture: poetry as music.
Neohelicon 48:2
► pp. 539 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.