Article published in:
Conversation Analysis in Chinese
Edited by Sandra A. Thompson and Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu
[Chinese Language and Discourse 7:2] 2016
► pp. 237271
References
Auer, Peter
2005 “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text 251: 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “On-line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 311: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R
1990 “On the Local Sensitivity of Conversation.” In The Dynamics of Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Markovà, and Klaus Foppa, 201–226. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O
2001 “The Grammaticalization of Jiushi and Jiushishuo in Mandarin Chinese.” Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 27 (2): 53–74.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Fabienne
2008 “Unfinished Turns in French Conversations: How Context Matters.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, Fabienne and Rebecca Clift
2008 “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (10): 1731–1752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Susan Haviland
1997 “Comprehension and the Given-New Contract.” In Discourse Production and Comprehension, ed. by Roy O. Freedle, 1–40. Hillside, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1996 “The Prosody of Repetition: On Quoting and Mimicry.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional studies, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 366–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2001Introducing Interactional Linguistics. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, ed. by Margret SeltingMargret Selting, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2004 “Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, 71–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr
1972 “Some Signals and Rules for Talking Speaking Turns in Conversation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23(2):283–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1974 “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns.” Language in Society 3(2):161–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr., and Donald W. Fiske
1977Face-To-Face Interaction: Research, methods, and theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, Jr., and George Niederehe
1974 “On Signalling That it’s Your Turn to Speak.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 101: 234–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H
2014 “States of the Larynx in Laughter.” In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Phonetics of Laughing, ed. by Jürgen Trouvain, and Nick Campbell, 15–20. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Mei
[方梅] 2000 “自然口語中弱化連詞的話語標記功能 [Reduced Conjunctions as Discourse Markers].” 中國語文 [ Zhongguo Yuwen ] 2000 (5): 459–470.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson
1996 “Practices in the Construction of Turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited.” Pragmatics 61: 427–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, and Sandra Thompson
1996Interactional Units in Conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecelia and Barbara Fox
2010Multiple Practices for Constructing Laughables. In Prosody in Interaction, ed. by Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Elisabeth Reber, and Margret Selting, 339–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecelia, Sandra Thompson, and Veronika Drake
2012 “Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.” Discourse Processes 49 (3-4): 192–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1984 [1967]Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1978 “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3-4): 272–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 62 (1-2): 29–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffitt, Kira
2008Functions of Leaning in Episodes of Laughter: Laughter as visual phenomenon. Unpublished MA thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 37–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
2003 “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(2): 109–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Junko Mori
1998 “Co-construction in Japanese Revisited: We do Finish Each Other’s Sentences.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 7, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji, Shoichi Iwasaki, Sung-Ock Sohn, and Susan Strauss, 77–93. Stanford: CSLI Publication.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic moments in interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984. “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriatel Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of conversation analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987 “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2013 “The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (1): 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1967 “Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 261: 22–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene
2002 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 351: 277–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua
1998 “The Discourse Functions of Dui A in Spoken Mandarin.” The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 28 (4): 505–29.Google Scholar
Kupetz, Maxi
2014 “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 4–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson
1996The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene
1991 “On the Syntax of Sentence-in-Progress.” Langauge in Society 201: 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996a “Finding ‘Face’ in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 591: 303–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996b “On the ‘Semi-permeable’ Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002. “Turn-Sharing: The Choral Co-production of Talk-in-interaction.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra Thompson, 225–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi, and Geoffrey Raymond, 95–134. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting
2013 “Language and the Body in the Construction of Units in Mandarin Face-to-Face Interaction.” In Units of Talk—Units of Action, ed. by Beatrice Szczepek Reed, and Geoffrey Raymond, 343–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2013 “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers, and Jack Sidnell, 350–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Local, John, Bill Wells, and Mark Sebba
1985 “Phonology for Conversation: Phonetic Aspects of Turn-delimitation in London Jamaican.” Journal of Pragmatics 91: 309–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John, John Kelly, and William Wells
1986 “Towards a Phonology of Conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (2): 411–437.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2007 “Multimodal Resources for Turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of Possible Next Speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 194–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Paul, and Hans von Leden
1958 “Dynamic Variations of the Vibratory Pattern in the Normal Larynx.” Folia Phoniatrica 101: 205–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Junko, and Makoto Hayashi
2006 “The Achievement of Intersubjectivity Through Embodied Completions: A study of Interactions between First and Second Language Speakers.” Applied Linguistics 27(2): 195–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C
1998Redegebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte-Theorie-Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Arno Spitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard
2001 “Turn Transition, Creak and Glottal Stop in Finnish Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 (1): 139–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsher, David
2004‘Talk and Gesture: The Embodied Completion of Sequential Actions in Spoken Interaction.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 221–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Omaggio Hadley, Alice
1993Teaching Language in Context. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Provine, Robert, and Yvonne Yong
1991 “Laughter: A Stereotyped Human Vocalization.” Ethology 891: 115–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984“Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1984 “On Some Gestures’ Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies of conversation analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1990 “On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. by Bruce Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1992 “Repair After Next Turn: The last structurally provided defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
1995Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “On the Interplay of Syntax and Prosody in the Constitution of Turn-Constructional Units and Turns in Conversation.” Pragmatics 61: 357–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk.” Language in Society 291: 477–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock, Susanne Uhmann
2009A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 121: 1–51.Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan
2002“如何处置 ‘处置式’?—论把字句的主观性 [Can the Disposal Construction be Disposed of?—On the subjectivity of Ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese.]” 中国语文 Zhongguo Yuwen 2002 (5): 387–399.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2004 “ ‘No No No’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2005 “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica 156 (1/4): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
1995 “On Projection.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 87–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009aGesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b “Forward-Gesturing.” Discourse Processes 46 (2): 161–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Ulrike Hartge
1992 “Previews: Gestures at the Transition Place.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 135–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin
, and Curtis LeBaron (eds.) 2011Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sarah Macfarlane
1998 “Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-projection and Overlap.” Language and Speech 411: 265–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Bill, and Sue Peppé
1996 “Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and Turn-taking in English Dialects.” In Prosody in Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Margret Selting, 101–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Celia Kitzinger
2006 “Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 691: 150–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina
2012 “Self-Praising Through Reporting: Strategic Use of Two Reporting Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 491: 622–659. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Hofstetter, Emily, Leelo Keevallik & Agnes Löfgren
2021. Suspending Syntax: Bodily Strain and Progressivity in Talk. Frontiers in Communication 6 Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting
2020. Click-Initiated Self-Repair in Changing the Sequential Trajectory of Actions-in-Progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:1  pp. 90 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting
2021. Multimodal practices for negative assessments as delicate matters: Incomplete syntax, facial expressions, and head movements. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 549 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaoting & Yaqiong Liu
2022. Interactional functions of truncated predicative complement construction “AP + (dek)le” as topic initiator in Shanghai Wu Chinese conversation. Text & Talk 0:0 Crossref logo
Park, Innhwa & Jacob Kline
2020. Incomplete utterances as critical assessments. Discourse Studies 22:4  pp. 441 ff. Crossref logo
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Hilla Polak-Yitzhaki, Xiaoting Li, Ioana Maria Stoenica, Martin Havlík & Leelo Keevallik
2021. Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Skogmyr Marian, Klara
2021. Assessing Without Words: Verbally Incomplete Utterances in Complaints. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Weiste, Elina
2021.  In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326],  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.