Cover not available
Article published In:
Conversation Analysis in Chinese
Edited by Sandra A. Thompson and Ruey-Jiuan Regina Wu
[Chinese Language and Discourse 7:2] 2016
► pp. 272–296

Organizing TCUs in a turn

Reordering and parenthesizing as operations for self-initiated same-turn repair in Mandarin conversation

| City University of Hong Kong

This paper examines two self-initiated same-turn repair operations, namely reordering and parenthesizing, in Mandarin conversation. Although both are initiated within a TCU, they often operate on global trouble sources instead of local ones internal to that TCU. On the surface, the two operations seem to share a similar formal pattern in which a TCU is first self-interrupted, and non-projected clausal materials are then produced before the interrupted TCU is resumed. What differentiate the two operations are their distinct roles in organizing TCUs in multi-unit turns. Reordering addresses the tension between the temporal sequence of the events being recounted and the temporal arrangement of the recounting. The clausal material added through reordering becomes an integral part in the rearrangement of the TCUs in that turn. Parenthesizing addresses the tension between the linearity of speech production and information management. It also addresses potential interactional problems to maintain intersubjectivity.

Keywords: conversational repair, parenthesizing, self-initiated same-turn repair, reordering, Mandarin conversation, conversation analysis
Published online: 23 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.2.04zha
References
Auer, P
2005 “Delayed Self-repair as a Structural Device for Complex Turns in Conversation.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 83–110. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Helen Kai-yun
2011 Sound Patterns in Sound Patterns in Mandarin Recycling Repair. PhD thesis, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Chui, Kawai
1996 “Organization of Repair in Chinese Conversation.” Text, 16(3): 343–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden
2013 “Self-repair and Action Construction.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 71–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duvallon, Outi, and Sara Routarinne
2005 Parenthesis as a Resource in the Grammar of Conversation. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 45–74. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa S. Gisladottir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque, and Francisco Torreira
2013 “Huh? What? – A first survey in 21 languages.” In Conversational repair and human understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 343–380. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fincke, Steven
1999 “The syntactic organization of repair in Bikol.” In Cognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, Dan Jurafsky, and Laura A. Michaelis, 252–267. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Fay Wouk, Makoto Hayashi, Steven Fincke, Liang Tao, Marja-Leena Sorjonen, Minna Laakso, and Wilfrido Flores Hernandez
2009 “A Cross-linguistic Investigation of the Site of Initiation in Same-turn Self-repair.” In Conversation Analysis: Comparative perspectives, ed. by Jack Sidnell, 60–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Makoto Hayashi, and Robert Jasperson
1996 “A Cross-linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara, Yael Maschler, and Susanne Uhmann
2010 “A Cross-linguistic Study of Self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2487–2505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1979 “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell
2013 Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1974 “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society, 21: 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin, H
2015 “The Intersection of Turn-taking and Repair: The Timing of Other-initiations of Repair in Conversation.” Frontiers in Psychology 61: 250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia
2012 “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Minna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2010 “Cut-off or Particle – Devices for Initiating Self-repair in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (4): 1151–1172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene, and Kitzinger, Celia
2012 “At the Intersection of Reference and Repair.” Special issue of Research on Language and Social Interaction 451: 2.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, C
2014 “The Social Life of Milliseconds: New Perspectives on Timing and Projection in Turn-taking.” Plenary Talk at the 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis , June 25–29, 2014, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lin, Hsueh-O
1996 “Repair in Taiwanese Conversation.” Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 221: 89–113.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong and Zhang, Wei
2010 “Insertion as a self-repair device and its interactional motivations in Chinese conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse, 1 (2): 153–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie
2007 “Parenthetical Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics, 391: 1816–1869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moerman, Michael
1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in a Thai Conversational Corpus.” Language 531: 872–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. by J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1979 “The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-conversation.” In Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 261–286. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation’s Turn-taking Organisation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. Lee, 70–85. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, A
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2013 “Ten Operations in Self-initiated, Same-turn Repair.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 531: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
1988 “The Role of Intonation in the Organization of Repair and Problem Handling Sequences in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 293–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Liang
1995 “Repair in Natural Conversation of Beijing Mandarin.” The Yuan Ren Society of Chinese Dialect Data 11: 55–78.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, and Ann Weatherall
2011 “Insertion Repair: Practices and Actions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 65–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Regina
2006 “Initiating Repair and Beyond: The Use of Two repeat-formatted Practices in Mandarin Conversation.” Discourse Processes 41 (1): 67–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Regina, and John Heritage
2014 ‘Particles and Epistemics: Convergences and Divergences between English and Mandarin’. Presented at The 4th International Conference on Conversation Analysis , June 25–29 2014, UCLA, USA.
Zhang, Wei, and Chan, Angela
2013 “Self-repair in Mandarin and Cantonese: Delaying the Next Item Due in Casual Conversation and News Interview.” In Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice, ed. by Pan Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 35–57. Equinox Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wei
1998 Repair in Chinese Conversation. PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu, Paul Drew & Chase Wesley Raymond
2024. The DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 15:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.