Cover not available
Part of
A Construction Grammar of the English Language: CASA – a constructionist approach to syntactic analysis
Thomas Herbst and Thomas Hoffmann
[Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 5] 2024
► pp. 291–302

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Aarts, Bas
2007 Syntactic Gradience: The Nature of Grammatical Indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aarts, Jan & Flor Aarts
1988 English Syntactic Structures (2nd edition). New York & Leyden: Prentice Hall & Martinus Nijhoff. (1st edition 1982 Pergamon Press)Google Scholar
Allerton, David
1990 Language as form and patterns: Grammar and its categories. In N. E. Collinge (ed.), An Encyclopaedia of Language, 68–111. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1998 On the phraseology of Spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, 101–121. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, Ben & Elena V. M. Lieven
2011 Child Language Acquisition. Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Eva-Maria & Thomas Hoffmann
2020 Turns out is not Ellipsis: A Usage-based Construction Grammar view on reduced constructions. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52(2), 240–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
1983 English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Heike
1999 Was macht Verben zu einer besonderen Kategorie im Spracherwerb? In Jörg Meibauer & Monika Rothweiler (eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, 32–50. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
2007 The acquisition of argument structure. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 193–214. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009a Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics 47(2), 383–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b Konstruktionen im Spracherwerb. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37, 427–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammatik und Lexikon im Spracherwerb. Konstruktionsprozesse. In Stefan Engelberg, Anke Holler, & Kristel Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 375–396. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bierwiaczonek, Boguslaw
2016 An Introductory English Grammar in Constructions. Częstochowa: Academia.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2003 A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2011 Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In Stefan Engelberg, Kristel Proost & Anke Holler (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 37–69. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2022 From Construction Grammar(s) to Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Hans. C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar. Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions, 3–43. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C., Benjamin Lyngfelt, & Tiago Timponi Torrent
2019 Framing constructicography. Lexicographica 35, 15–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2013 Morphology in Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Jeremy K. & Adele E. Goldberg
2011 Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in ‘a’-adjective production. Language 81(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. & M. Ford
2010 Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86, 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian & George Yule
1983 Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgschmidt, Ernst
1977 Strukturierung, Norm und Produktivität in der Wortbildung. In Herbert Ernst Brekle, & Dieter Kastovsky (eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, 39–47. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag.Google Scholar
Buysschaert, Joost
1982 Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials, Brussel: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995 Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognition Processes 10(5), 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015 Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantos-Gomez, Pascual & Moises Almela Sánchez
2001 Lexical constellations: What collocations fail to tell. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6(2), 199–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2006 Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions SV 1–7: 1–28. [URL]
Cappelle, Bert, Edwige Dugas & Vera Tobin
2015 An afterthought on let alone. Journal of Pragmatics 80, 70–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casenhiser, Devin & Adele E. Goldberg
2005 Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8(6), 500–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge/Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In R. A. Jacobs & P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Blaisdell.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge/MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert E. & Eve V. Clark
1979 Psychology and Language. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Colleman, Timothy
2011 Ditransitive verbs and the ditransitive construction: A diachronic perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4), 380–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, Nelson
2008 What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research 169, 323–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, Anthony P., Ronald Mackin, and Isabel R. McCaig
1983 Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol 2: Phrase, Clause and Sentence Idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony P. and R. Mackin
1975 Oxford Dictionary of Current Idiomatic English. Vol. 1: Verbs with Prepositions and Particles. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Radical Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William and Alan. D. Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruse, David A.
1986 Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David A.
1967 English. Lingua 17, 24–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. and Ray Jackendoff
1999 The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 543–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2014a Recycling utterances: A speaker’s guide to sentence processing. Cognitive Linguistics 25(4), 617–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven
2005 Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3), 437–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Marcin Szczerbinski
2006 Polish children’s productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity. Journal of Child Language 33(3), 559–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deacon, Terrance
1997 The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Diamond, Adele
2013 Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 64, 135–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2013 Construction Grammar and first language acquisition. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 347–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019 The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure Is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René & Günter Radden
1977 Semantische Syntax des Englischen. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2003 Constructions, chunking & connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 63–103. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics 27(2), 164–194, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Stefanie Wulff
2015 Usage-based approaches to SLA. In Bill Van Patten & Jessica Williams (Eds.), Theories in Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 75–93. Florence: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Elman, Jeffrey L.
2004 An alternative view of the lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(7), 301–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1976 A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Esser, Jürgen
1992 Neuere Tendenzen in der Grammatikschreibung des Englischen- Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 40(2), 112–123.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan
2005 The Statistics of Word Co-occurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart Dissertation.
Evert, Stefan, Peter Uhrig, Sabine Bartsch, Thomas Proisl
2017 E-VIEW-alation – A large-scale evaluation study of association measures for collocation identification. In Electronic lexicography in the 21st century. Proceedings of the eLex 2017 conference, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
1996 Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 113–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Felfe, Marc, Dagobert Höllein, & Klaus Welke
(eds.) Regelbasierte Konstruktionsgrammatik: Musterbasiertheit vs. Idiomatizität. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter 2024 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1968 The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 0–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
1985 Syntactic intrusions and the notion of grammatical construction. Berkeley Linguistic Society 11, 73–86.Google Scholar
1988 The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar.” In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jassier & Helen Singmaster (eds.), General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, 35–55. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Valency issues in FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency. Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 129–160. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Frames, constructions and FrameNet. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 121–166. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson, & Miriam R. L. Petruck
2003 Background to FrameNet, International Journal of Lexicography 16(3), 236–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Russell R. Lee-Goldman & Russell Rhomieux
2012 The FrameNet constructicon. In Ivan A. Sag & Hans C. Boas (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 309–372. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, & Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3), 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2006 Konstruktionsgrammatik: Ein Überblick. In Kerstin Fischer & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: Von der Anwendung zur Theorie, 3–17. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2007 To err is not all: What corpus and elicitation can reveal about the use of collocation by learners. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3), 273–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in Applied Construction Grammar. In Hans. C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and teaching (with) constructions, 73–96. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 Causative constructions in process: How do they come into existence in learner writing? Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11, 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Thomas
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gläser, Rosemarie
1990 Phraseologie der englischen Sprache. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2019 Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Thomas Herbst
2021 The nice-of-you construction and its fragments. Linguistics 59(1), 285–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3), 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Magali Paquot
2008 Disentangling the phraseological web. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
1969 Studies in English Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1974 Some verb-intensifier collocations in American and British English. American Speech 49(1/2), 79–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1970 Elicitation Experiments in English: Linguistic Studies in Use and Attitude. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle L. and Laura A. Michaelis
2001 Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2005 Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective, 3–25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch
2004 Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff
2005 Do foreign learners have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 182–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermann, Mechthild
2023 The German geschweige denn construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11, 151–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991 Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford/UK/Cambridge/US: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967–8 Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics. 3(1) Part 1: 37–81, 3(2) Part 2: 199–244, 4(2) Part 3: 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970 Language structure and language function. In John Lyons (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruquaya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hampe Schönefeld
2003 Hampe, Beate & Doris Schönefeld 2003 Creative syntax: Iconic principles within the symbolic. In Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds.), From Sign to Signing, 243–261. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
2000 Do word meanings exist? Computers and the Humanities 34 (1/2), 205–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, Franz Josef
1984 Wortschatzlernen ist Kollokationslernen. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 31, 394–406.Google Scholar
1985 Kollokationen im deutschen Wörterbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des lexikographischen Beispiels. In Henning Bergenholtz & Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Lexikographie und Grammatik, 118–129. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Die Kollokationen im Rahmen der Phraseologie: Systematische und historische Darstellung. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3), 217–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Wolfgang Schenkel
1973 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. (2nd edition). Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas
1983 Untersuchungen zur Valenz englischer Adjektive und ihrer Nominalisierungen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1984 Adjective complementation: A valency approach to making EFL dictionaries. Applied Linguistics V(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? English Studies 77(4), 379–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 English Linguistics: A Coursebook for Students of English. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a The Status of Generalizations: Valency and Argument Structure Constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4): 347–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Choosing sandy beaches – collocations, probabemes and the idiom principle. In Thomas Herbst, Susen Faulhaber, & Peter Uhrig (eds.), The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair, 27–57, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument Structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 2, 253–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 167–216. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Why Construction Grammar catches the worm and corpus data can drive you crazy: Accounting for idiomatic and non-idiomatic idiomaticity. Journal of Social Sciences 11(3), 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a Foreign language learning is construction learning – what else? Moving towards Pedagogical Construction Grammar. In Sabine de Knop & Gaêtanelle Gilquin (eds.), Applied Construction Grammar, 21–51. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b Wörterbuch war gestern. Programm für ein unifiziertes Konstruktikon. In Stefan Schierholz, Rufus Hjalmar Gouws, Zita Hollós,/Werner Wolski (eds.), Wörterbuchforschung und Lexikographie, 169–206. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a Menschliche Sprache: Ein Netzwerk aus Mustern genannt Konstruktionen. In Rudolf Freiburg (ed.), Sprachwelten, 105–127. Erlangen: FAU University Press.Google Scholar
2018b Is language a collostructicon? A proposal for looking at valency, argument structure and other constructions. In Pascual Cantos-Gomez & Moises Almela Sanchez (eds.). Lexical Collocation Analysis: Advances and Applications, 1–22. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Constructicons – A new type of reference work? Lexicographica 35(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020b Dependency and valency approaches. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), 124–152). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 Frame elements, argument roles and word meaning – three sides of the same coin? In Kristian Blensenius (ed.), Valency and Constructions, 59–99. Göteborg: Meijerbergs institut for svensk etymologisk forskning.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, David Heath, Ian F. Roe, & Dieter Götz
2004 A Valency Dictionary of English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas & Thomas Hoffmann
2018 Construction Grammar for students: A Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6, 197–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas & Peter Uhrig
2020 The issue of specifying slots in argument structure constructions in terms of form and meaning. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34, 135–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2008 Germanic Future Constructions. A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert
2019 Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Second edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2020 Constructional Approaches. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 106–123. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2017 Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The Role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3,1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Creativity and construction grammar: Cognitive and psychological issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3), 259–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019b Language and creativity: A construction grammar approach to linguistic creativity. Linguistics Vanguard 5(1), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021a Multimodal Construction Grammar: From multimodal constructs to multimodal constructions. In Xu Wen & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Routledge, 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021b The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes: Construction Grammar as the Cognitive Theory for the Dynamic Model. (Cambridge Elements in World Englishes). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 Construction Grammar: The Structure of English. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 Constructicon in Progress: A short introduction to the constructionist approach to syntactic analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11, 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas, Thomas Brunner & Jakob Horsch
2020 English comparative correlative constructions: A usage-based account. Open Linguistics 6, 196–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Thomas Herbst
Forthc. Identifying and combining English constructions – some challenges facing a Construction Grammar approach to syntactic analysis.
Hoffmann, Thomas, Jakob Horsch & Thomas Brunner
2019 The More Data, The Better: A Usage-based Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction. Cognitive Linguistics 30(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
(eds) 2013 The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, Willem
2014 Word classes: Towards a more comprehensive usage-based account. In Nikolas Gisborne & Willem B. Hollmann (eds.), Theory and Data in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard
1984 Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2002 Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Dan
2003 Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, & Stefanie Jannedy, (eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics, 39–95/96. Cambridge & MA & London: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel & James H. Martin
2023 Vector Semantics and Embeddings. Speech and Language Processing (draft). [URL]
Kaltenböck, Günther
2020 Information structuring. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 461–482. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2007 The English Noun Phrase. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Noun Phrases. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 335–357. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok and Laura Michaelis
2020 Syntactic Constructions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky
1971 Fact. In Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Michael & Thomas Herbst
2016 English Dictionaries. A Linguistic Introduction. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Knop, Sabine de & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2016 Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knut
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
2001 Dislocation. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, 1050–1078. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1 Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2 Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2003/2009 Constructions in Cognitive Grammar. In Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), Investigations in Cognitive Grammar, 1–39, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (originally in English Linguistics, 20, 41–83)Google Scholar
2008a Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b The relevance of Cognitive Grammar for language pedagogy. In Sabine de Knop & Teun Rycker (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar, 7–35. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Trees, assemblies, chains and windows. Constructions and Frames 12(1), 8–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapesa, Gabriella & Stefan Evert
2014 A large scale evaluation of distributional semantic models: Parameters, interactions and model selection. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2, 531–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lea, Diana
2007 Making a collocations dictionary. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3), 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1971 Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1981 Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. & Jan Svartvik
1975 A Communicative Grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leino, Jakko
2013 Information structure. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 329–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieven, Elena
2014 First-language learning from a usage-based approach. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid, & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – Collocations – Patterns, 9–32. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohndahl, Terje & Liliane Haegeman
2020 Generative approaches. In Bas Aarts, Jill Bowie, & Gergana Popova (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar, 153–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara, & Tiago Timponi Torren
(eds.) 2018 Constructicography: Constructicon Development across Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Makkai, Adam
1972 Idiom Structure in English. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter
1981 Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 The scope of valency in grammar. In Thomas Herbst & Katrin Götz-Votteler (eds.), Valency. Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues, 3–14. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2013 Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 133–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975 A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene
2013 The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Tessendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, 750–779. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2023 Grammatical Theory: From Transformational Grammar to Constraint-based Approaches. (Textbooks in Language Sciences 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2005 Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary online
[URL]
Palmer, Frank R.
1971 Grammar. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1981 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patel, Malin, Armine Garibyan, Elodie Winckel & Stephanie Evert
A reference constructicon as a database. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11, 175–202. DOI logo
Patten, Amanda & Florent Perek
2019 Towards an English constructicon using patterns and frames. International Journal of Corpus Lingustics 24, 356–386.Google Scholar
Perek, Florent
2015 Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petruck, Miriam R. L.
1996 Frame semantics. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–11. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & René Dirven
2007 Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1988 Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Head-hunting: On the trail of the nominal Janus. In Greville B. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser, & Scott McClashen (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, 73–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rezac, Milan
2006 On tough-movement. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist Essays, 288–325. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothweiler, Monika & Jörg Meibauer
1999 Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb – Ein Überblick. In Jörg Meibauer & Monika Rothweiler (eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, 9–31. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A.
2010 English filler-gap constructions. Language 86(3), 486–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina & Peter Uhrig
2024 “I’m gonna get totally and utterly X-ed.” Constructing drunkenness. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 11, 121–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C. & Robert P. Abelson
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale/NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000 English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Collocation: hard to pin down, but bloody useful. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 51(3), 235–258.Google Scholar
2005 Englische Morphologie und Wortbildung. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
2011 English Morphology and Word-formation. An introduction. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
2017 A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.) Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA & Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 The Dynamics of the Linguistic System. Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönefeld, Doris
2006 From conceptualization to linguistic expression: Where languages diversify. In Stefan Th. Gries and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: The Syntax-Lexis Interface, 297–344. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, Helmut Schumacher, Jacqueline Kubczak, Renate Schmidt, & Vera de Ruiter
2004 VALBU – Valenzwörterbuch deutscher Verben. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Siepmann, Dirk
2007 Wortschatz und Grammatik: Zusammenbringen, was zusammengehört. Beiträge zur Fremdsprachenvermittlung 46, 59–80.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH.
2004 Trust the Text. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John Mc.H. and Anna Mauranen
2006 Linear Unit Grammar: Integrating speech and writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steels, Luc
2013 Fluid Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 153–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, Francis and Mark Turner
2013 Multimodal construction grammar. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier and Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the Creative Mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2003 The English imperative: A construction-based approach. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Bremen.
2011a Argument structure: Item-based or distributed? Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4): 369–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Keine Grammatik ohne Konstruktionen: Ein logisch-ökonomisches Argument für die Konstruktionsgrammatik. In Stefan Engelberg, Anke Holler & Kristel Proost (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 181–210. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Collostructional analysis: A case study of the English into-caausative. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions, Colocations, Patterns, 216–238. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The goal-bias revisited: a collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6, 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde
2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–268. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Street, James & Ewa Dąbrowska
2014 Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics 35, 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1989 Linguistic Categorization. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959/2015 Elements of Structural Syntax. (Trans.) Timothy Osborne & Sylvain Kahane. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1992 First Verbs. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Constructing a Language. Cambridge/MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott
2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger, & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, 219–250. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2015 Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 51–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark
2018 The role of creativity in multimodal Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3), 357–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
1999 A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today 20(3), 397–418.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea E.
2012 Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. New York/London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea E., Lourdes Ortega, Mariko Uno, & Hae In Park
(eds.) 2018 Usage-inspired L2 Instruction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhrig, Peter
2015 Why the Principle of No Synonymy is overrated. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3), 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Subjects in English: From Valency Grammar to a Constructionist Treatment of Non-Canonical Subjects. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Multimodal research in linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68(4), 345–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Large-Scale Multimodal Corpus Linguistics – The Big Data Turn. Habilitationsschrift Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (unpublished ms.).Google Scholar
Uhrig, Peter, Susen Faulhaber, Ewa Dąbrowska & Thomas Herbst
2022 L2-words that go together – more on collocation and learner language. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar, 97–119, Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid
22006 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Trijp, Remi
2014 Cognitive vs. generative Construction Grammar: The case of coercion and argument structure. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4), 613–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welke, Klaus
2011 Valenzgrammatik des Deutschen. Eine Einführung. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Konstruktionsgrammatik des Deutschen: Ein sprachgebrauchsbezogener Ansatz. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C.
2006 English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander
2008 Frame-Semantik und Diskursanalyse: Skizze einer kognitionswissenschaftlich inspirierten Methode zur Analyse gesellschaftlichen Wissens. In Ingo H. Warnke & Jürgen Spitzmüller (eds.), Methoden der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene. Methoden, 89–116. Berlin /New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ziem, Alexander & Alexander Lasch
2013 Konstruktionsgrammatik: Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsorientierter Ansätze. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, Alexander & Tim Feldmüller
2023 Dimensions of constructional meanings in the German Constructicon: Why collo-profiles matter. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 11, 203–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Constructicon

www.con​​struct​​icon.de
The CASA-ConstruCtiCon of the English Language.

Corpora and other sources

BNC British National Corpus
Distributed by Oxford University Computing Service on behalf of the BNC Consortium.
Childes Elena Lieven & Jeannette Goh
CHILDES English Thomas Corpus [URL]
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
COCA Corpus of Contemporary English, Mark Davies
[URL]
MOVIES Movies 1930s–2018
200 million words) [URL]
NOW News on the Web
over 15 billion words) [URL]
TV TV corpus
over 325 million words) [URL]
NYT New York Times
[URL]