Article published in:
Complex Processes in New LanguagesEdited by Enoch Oladé Aboh and Norval Smith
[Creole Language Library 35] 2009
► pp. 317–344
Competition and selection
That’s all!
This paper demonstrates that the notion of simplicity as often used in creole studies is completely irrelevant to the understanding of the structure, as well as the genesis, of creole languages. This is because creole languages are linguistic hybrids in the biological sense. They emerge from the recombination of linguistic features from different languages. Given this perspective, it appears that what could be of some relevance to the study of language change is rather the notion of complexity. Within the framework of Competition and Selection as proposed in Mufwene (2001ff.), and adopted in this paper, creole languages develop opaque syntactic and semantic features. These could not have arisen solely in the context of their source languages. Accordingly, the common claim that creoles are simplified versions of their sources is a fallacy, just as it would be to claim in biology that hybrids are genetically simplified children of their parents.
Published online: 17 December 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.35.20abo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.35.20abo
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Aboh, Enoch O.
Aboh, Enoch O.
Aboh, Enoch O.
Aboh, Enoch O. & Michel DeGraff
Axelsen, Jacob Bock & Susanna Manrubia
Baptista, Marlyse
Baptista, Marlyse
Baptista, Marlyse
Herbert, Marjorie & Acrisio Pires
Manfredi, Stefano & Fida Bizri
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
O’Shannessy, Carmel
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.