• Forthcoming titles
      • New in paperback
      • New titles by subject
      • February 2023
      • January 2023
      • December 2022
      • November 2022
      • New serials
      • Latest issues
      • Currently in production
      • Active series
      • Other series
      • Open-access books
      • Text books & Course books
      • Dictionaries & Reference
      • By JB editor
      • Active serials
      • Other
      • By JB editor
      • Printed catalogs
      • E-book collections
      • Amsterdam (Main office)
      • Philadelphia (North American office)
      • General
      • US, Canada & Mexico
      • E-books
      • Examination & Desk Copies
      • General information
      • Access to the electronic edition
      • Special offers
      • Terms of Use
      • E-newsletter
      • Book Gazette
Chapter published in:
Metaphor and National Identity: Alternative conceptualization of the Treaty of Trianon
Orsolya Putz
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 11] 2019
► pp. 33–66

Chapter 2
The agreement frame

Article outline
  • 1.The nation, country, and the state frames
  • 2.The Peace Treaty of Trianon as an event and as a status
  • 3.The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a non-prototypical agreement and as a dictate
  • 4.The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a complex event
    • 4.1The sequential scanning of the Peace Treaty of Trianon
    • 4.2The summary scanning of the Trianon peace treaty
    • 4.3The Trianon peace treaty as a sub-event of a sequence of causes and effects
  • 5.Conceptual metonymies of the concepts of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon
    • 5.1The decision made in Trianon as a source concept
      • 5.1.1A sub-event of agreement for agreement → a sub-event of the complex event for the complex event → part for whole metonymy
    • 5.2The Peace Treaty of Trianon as a source concept
      • 5.2.1 Agreement making for the dominant party of the agreement → the event for one of the participants of the event → whole for part metonymy
      • 5.2.2 The document ratifying the agreement for the agreement → a physical object for an event → part for whole metonymy
    • 5.3Trianon as a source concept
      • 5.3.1 The place where the peace treaty was ratified for the time of ratification→ the place of the salient event of the complex event for the time of the complex event → part for part metonymy
      • 5.3.2 The place where the agreement was ratified for the agreement making→ the place of the complex event’s salient event for the complex event → part for whole metonymy
      • 5.3.3 The place where the agreement was ratified for the dominant party of agreement making→ the place of the complex event’s salient event for the dominant party of the complex event → part for part metonymy
      • 5.3.4 The place where the agreement was ratified for the knowledge about the agreement→ the place of the complex event’s salient event for knowledge about the complex event → part for whole metonymy
    • 5.4The scope of the source concepts of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon
    • 5.5The relation of the terms of Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon
      • 5.5.1Adjective phrases
      • 5.5.2Possessive noun phrase
      • 5.5.3Compounds
  • 6.Conceptual metaphors of the Peace Treaty of Trianon and Trianon
    • 6.1 Trianon as a value of a category role
    • 6.2Trianon as an input space
    • 6.3Trianon and the peace treaty as agents
      • 6.3.1Trianon and the peace treaty as persons who cause harm
      • 6.3.2 Trianon and the peace treaty are means of disintegrating an object
    • 6.4 Trianon as a substance
      • 6.4.1 Trianon is a substance in the mind
      • 6.4.2 Trianon is substance in the soul
    • 6.5 Trianon is mental and emotional illness
  • 7.Metaphors and metonymies of Trianon
  • 8.Summary
Share via FacebookShare via TwitterShare via LinkedInShare via WhatsApp
About us | Disclaimer | Privacy policy | | | | Antiquariathttps://benjamins.com