Cover not available
Part of
Language, Culture and Identity – Signs of Life
Edited by Vera da Silva Sinha, Ana Moreno-Núñez and Zhen Tian
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 13] 2020
► pp. 203–225

Chapter 10
Mid hefigum byrþenum

A study of the burden metaphor in Old English

| Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University,
Conceptual Metaphor Theory lays a strong emphasis on embodiment; Lakoff and Johnson (1980: 257) for example maintain that “many primary metaphors are universal because everybody has basically the same kinds of bodies and brains”. It might be expected therefore that metaphors grounded in sensory-motor experience will take similar forms cross-culturally. However, the status of weight as a source domain in Old English shows that although the conceptual metaphor difficulties are burdens might be grounded in sensory-motor experience, the various weight-related metaphors arising in the domains of discipline, religion, labour, and health cannot be explained without accounting for the cultural conceptualizations upon which they rest (Sharifian 2011; Yu 2009). This study therefore affirms the role of socio-cultural influence on metaphorical conceptualization. The study is based primarily on a semasiological analysis of hefig ‘heavy’, with data taken from the Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus (Healey et al. 2009), and the Dictionary of Old English (Cameron et al. 2016). This paper situates the Old English burden metaphor within a network of cultural metaphors and culturally-specific proposition-schemas (Quinn 1987), shining light both on the nature of conceptual metaphor, and on Anglo-Saxon world-views.
Keywords: metaphor, cultural schema, Old English, weight
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Data and methodology
  • Metaphor, embodiment and culture
  • Weight in Old English
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.13.10sco
References (48)
References
ÆAdmon 1 = Norman, H. W. (ed.). 1848. The Anglo-Saxon version of the Hexameron of St. Basil, or, Be Godes six daga weorcum. And the Saxon remains of St. Basil’s Admonitio ad filium spiritualem. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
ÆCHom I = Clemoes, Peter (ed.). 1997. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The First Series, Text. EETS. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ÆCHom II = Godden, Malcolm (ed.). 1979. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The Second Series, Text. EETS. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ÆHom = Pope, John C. (Ed.). 1967–8. Homilies of Ælfric: A Supplementary Collection [2 vols.] EETS. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ÆLS = Skeat, Walter W., (ed. and trans.). 1881–1890, reprinted 2004. Ælfric’s Lives of Saints [2 vols]. EETS. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bede = Miller, T. (ed.). 1890–98. The Old English Version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People, 4 vols., EETS 95, 96, 110, 111. London: Oxford University Press [repr. 1959–63].Google Scholar
BEDA. Hist.eccl. 4.5 = Colgrave, Bertram and Mynors, Roger A. B. (eds). 1969. Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Oxford: Oxford Medieval Texts.Google Scholar
BenR = Schröer, Arnold. 1885–8. Die angelsächsischen Prosabearbeitungen der Benediktinerregel [Bib. ags. Prosa 2]. Kassel: G. H. Weigand [repr. with appendix by H. Gneuss (Darmstadt 1964)].Google Scholar
Cameron, Angus, Crandell Amos, Ashley, Healey, Antonette diPaolo et al. (eds). 2016. Dictionary of Old English: A to H online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.Google Scholar
CP = Sweet, H. 1871. King Alfred’s West-Saxon Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care [2 vols.], EETS 45, 50. London: Oxford University Press [repr. 1958].Google Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Exod = Exodus (London, British Library, MS. Cotton Claudius B.IV): Crawford, S. J. 1922. The Old English Version of the Heptateuch, EETS 160. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frotscher, Antje. 2013. “Treasure and Violence: Mapping a Conceptual Metaphor in Medieval Heroic Literature”. Neophilologus 97: 753–774.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
GDPref and 4; GD 1 (C) = Hecht, Hans (Ed.). 1900–7. Bischof Waerferths von Worcester Uebersetzung der Dialoge Gregors des Grossen. Leipzig/Hamburg: Bib. ags. Prosa 5 [reprinted: Darmstadt 1965].Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2015. “Four Guidelines for Diachronic Metaphor Research”. In Metaphor and Metonymy across Time and Cultures: Perspectives on the Sociohistorical Linguistics of Figurative Language, Javier Enrique Díaz-Vera (ed.), 15–28. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gen = Genesis (London, British Library, MS. Cotton Claudius B.IV). Crawford, S. J. 1922. The Old English Version of the Heptateuch, EETS 160. London: Oxford University Press. [repr. with additions by N. R. Ker 1969].Google Scholar
GREG.MAG. Dial. = de Vogüé, Adalbert (ed.). 1979–1980. Gregory the Great, Dialogi. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Healey, Antonette di Paolo, Wilkin, John Price and Xiang, Xin. 2009. Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
HomS 16 = Assmann, Bruno. 1889. Angelsächsische Homilien und Heiligenleben, Bib. ags. Prosa 3 (Kassel) [repr. with intro. by P. Clemoes (Darmstadt 1964)].Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1997. “Embodied Meaning and Cognitive Science”. In Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy, David Levin (ed.), 148–175. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2016. The heart of the matter: a matter of the heart. Central aspects of the Christian mind. Available at [URL]. Accessed December 2016.
. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image–schemas?”. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [vol. 1]. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LawIIIEg =III Eadgar. Liebermann, Eadgar (ed.). 1903–16. Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen. Halle: Max Niemeyer. [repr. Aalen 1960].Google Scholar
LawRect = Rectitudines. Liebermann, Eadgar (ed.). 1903–16. Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen. Halle: Max Niemeyer. [repr. Aalen 1960].Google Scholar
Lockett, Leslie. 2011. Anglo-Saxon Psychologies in the Vernacular and Latin Traditions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LS 34 (VitPatr) = 195–207; Assmann, Bruno. 1889. Angelsächsische Homilien und Heiligenleben, Bib. ags. Prosa 3 (Kassel); [repr. with intro. by P. Clemoes (Darmstadt 1964)].Google Scholar
Met = Krapp, G. P. 1932. The Paris Psalter and the Meters of Boethius, ASPR 5. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Narayanan, Srini. 1997. Embodiment in Language Understanding: Sensory-Motor Representations for Metaphoric Reasoning about Event Descriptions. [Unpublished doctoral thesis], Department of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Katherine O. B. 1998. “Body and law in late Anglo-Saxon England”. Anglo-Saxon England 27: 209–232.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PPs (prose) = Psalms 1–50: Bright, James and Ramsay, Robert (eds). 1907. Liber Psalmorum: The West-Saxon Psalms, Being the Prose Portion, or the ‘First Fifty’ of the So-Called Paris Psalter. Boston: D. C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi. 1987. “Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage”. In Cultural models in language and thought, Naomi Quinn and Dorothy Holland (eds.), 173–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Naomi, and Holland, Dorothy (eds.). 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawcliffe, Carole. 2006. Leprosy in Medieval England. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer Ltd.Google Scholar
Rid = Riddles: Krapp, George and Dobbie, Elliott (eds). 1936. The Exeter Book, ASPR 3. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2011. Cultural Conceptions and Language: Theoretical Framework and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John. 2003. Linguistic Categorization [third edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Jonathan (ed.). 1994. Ælfric’s Prefaces. Durham: Durham Medieval Texts.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludvig. 1978. Philosophical Investigations [translated by G. E. M. Anscombe]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold, and Sadock, Jerry. 1975. “Ambiguity tests and how to fail them”. In Syntax and Semantics 4, John Kimball (ed.), 1–35. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar