References
Casasanto, D.
(2009) Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cieslicka, A.
(2002) Comprehension and interpretation of proverbs in L2. Studia Anglica Poznaniensia, 37, 173–200.Google Scholar
Clausner, T., & Croft, W.
(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21(3), 247–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
(2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 214–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., L. K. Strom, & M. Spivey-Knowlton
. (1997) Conceptual metaphor in mental imagery for proverbs. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, 3/4, 83–110.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(1997) The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. diss., University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. In R. Gibbs, & G. Steen, (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, D. & Quinn, N.
, (Eds.) (1987) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeck, R. & Temple, J. G.
(1994) Proverbs: The extended conceptual base and great chain metaphor theories. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(2), 85–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I.
(2013) The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In R. Caballero, & J. Diaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: Explorations into human sentience – imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 109–133). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering the role of context in metaphor. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020) Extendedconceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021) Metaphoric conceptual pathways. Cognitive Semantics, 7(1), 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Second edition. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.) Cultural models in language and thought. (pp. 195–221). Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trim, R.
(2007) Metaphor networks. The comparative evolution of figurative language. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2011) Metaphor and the historical evolution of conceptual mapping. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N.
(1998) The contemporary theory of metaphor. A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar