Article published in:Language Structure and Environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors
Edited by Rik De Busser and Randy J. LaPolla
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 6] 2015
► pp. 133–148
Chapter 6. Societies of intimates and linguistic complexity
The uniformitarian principle that knowledge of processes that operated in the past can be inferred by observing ongoing processes in the present is fundamental to historical linguistics. But there is an important respect in which the present is not like the past. Increasing population and mobility have led to increasing language contact and larger language communities. For ninety-seven percent of their history, human languages were spoken in neolithic and pre-neolithic societies which were societies of intimates, characterized by small size and dense social networks. A sociolinguistic-typological perspective suggests that the languages spoken in these communities may therefore have been typologically rather different from most modern languages, and that the methodology of ‘using the present to explain the past’ might therefore be less useful the further back in time we go.
Published online: 09 June 2015
Cited by 4 other publications
Mudd, Katie, Hannah Lutzenberger, Connie de Vos, Paula Fikkert, Onno Crasborn & Bart de Boer
Reali, Florencia, Nick Chater & Morten H. Christiansen
Stirling, Lesley & Jennifer Green
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Aikhenvald, A.Y., & Dixon, R.M.W.
Givón, T., & Young, P.
(2000) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Fourteenth Edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Retrieved from http://www.ethnologue.com/14
(1980) The covariation of culture and grammar (PhD). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.