Cover not available
Part of
Language Structure and Environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors
Edited by Rik De Busser and Randy J. LaPolla
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 6] 2015
► pp. 133–148

Chapter 6. Societies of intimates and linguistic complexity

| Agder University

The uniformitarian principle that knowledge of processes that operated in the past can be inferred by observing ongoing processes in the present is fundamental to historical linguistics. But there is an important respect in which the present is not like the past. Increasing population and mobility have led to increasing language contact and larger language communities. For ninety-seven percent of their history, human languages were spoken in neolithic and pre-neolithic societies which were societies of intimates, characterized by small size and dense social networks. A sociolinguistic-typological perspective suggests that the languages spoken in these communities may therefore have been typologically rather different from most modern languages, and that the methodology of ‘using the present to explain the past’ might therefore be less useful the further back in time we go.

Published online: 9 June 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.6.06tru
References

Bibliography

Aikhenvald, A.Y
(2003) A grammar Of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.Y., & Dixon, R.M.W
(1998) Evidentials and areal typology: A case study from Amazonia. Language Sciences, 20(3), 241–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.J
(1982) On the Yin and Yang Nature of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D
(1981) Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
(1996) Language and human behavior. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Blust, R.A
(2005) Must sound change be linguistically motivated? Diachronica, 22(2), 219–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, R.L
(1973) Scale analysis, evolutionary sequences, and the range of cultures. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 834–871). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö
(2004) The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dench, A
(1994) The historical development of pronoun paradigms in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 14(2), 155–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
(1988) A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1997) The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010a) Basic linguistic theory, Volume 1: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010b) Basic linguistic theory, Volume 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, M.S
(1989) Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language, 13(2), 257–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epps, P
(2008) A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V
(2009) Review of Ronald Langacker, Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 562 pp. Language and Cognition, 1(2), 277–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geraghty, P.A
(1983) The history of the Fijian languages. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T
(1979) On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (2 Volumes). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T., & Young, P
(2002) Cooperation and interpersonal manipulation in the society of intimates. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp. 23–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimes, B.F
(2000) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Fourteenth Edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Güldemann, T
(2001) Die Entlehnung pronominaler Elemente des Khoekhoe aus dem !Ui-Taa. Manuscript, Leipzig University.Google Scholar
Haugen, E
(1976) The Scandinavian languages: An introduction to their history. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Hutchisson, D
(1986) Sursurunga pronouns and the special uses of quadral number. In U. Wiesemann (Ed.), Pronominal systems (pp. 1–20). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1894) Progress in language, with special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
(1922) Language. Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allan & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kay, P
(1976) Discussion of papers by Kiparsky and Wescott. In S.R. Harnard, H.D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origin and evolution of language and speech (pp. 17–19). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.L
(1976) Discussion. In S.R. Harnard, H.D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origin and evolution of language and speech (pp. 92–96). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Labov, W
(1994) Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langer, W.L
(1987) An encyclopedia of world history. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Laycock, D.C
(1982) Melanesian linguistic diversity: A Melanesian choice? In R.J. May & H. Nelson (Eds.), Melanesia: Beyond diversity (pp. 33–38). Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, M
(1999) The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, J
(2007) Review: The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity by Östen Dahl. Diachronica, 24(1), 171–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R.D
(1980) The covariation of culture and grammar (PhD). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
(1992) Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A
(2004) Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, J.J
(2001) Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
(1983) On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2011) Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, J
(2010) Language endangerment, community size and typological rarity. In J. Wohlgemuth & M. Cysouw (Eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory (pp. 255–277). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A., & Grace, G.W
(2007) The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117(3), 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Dąbrowska, Ewa
2020. How Writing Changes Language. In Language Change, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Marcus, Imogen
2018. Introduction. In The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mudd, Katie, Hannah Lutzenberger, Connie de Vos, Paula Fikkert, Onno Crasborn & Bart de Boer
2020. The effect of sociolinguistic factors on variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Müller, André & Rachel Weymuth
2017. How Society Shapes Language: Personal Pronouns in the Greater Burma Zone. Asiatische Studien - Études Asiatiques 71:1 ► pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Reali, Florencia, Nick Chater & Morten H. Christiansen
2018. Simpler grammar, larger vocabulary: How population size affects language. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1871 ► pp. 20172586 ff. DOI logo
Stirling, Lesley & Jennifer Green
2016. Narrative in ‘societies of intimates’. Narrative Inquiry 26:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A History of the Study of the Indigenous Languages of North America [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 129], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.