References

Bibliography

Borges, J.L
(1964) Labyrinths: Selected stories & other writings. New York, NY: New Directions Publishing.Google Scholar
Brody, M
(1998) The minimalist program and a perfect syntax: A critical notice of Noam Chomsky’s The Minimalist Program. Mind and Language, 13(2), 205–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calvet, J.-L
(2006) Towards an ecology of world languages. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E
(1962) An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.H
(2009) Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(4), 1015–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N
(2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W
(2002) Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T., & Bowern, C
(2010) An introduction to historical linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö
(2004) The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, R., & Lupyan, G
(2012) Understanding the origins of morphological diversity: The linguistic niche hypothesis. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3), 1150017–1–1150017–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, M
(2013, April). Corpus of global web-based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE). Brighman Young University. Online Corpus. Retrieved 15 September 2013 from [URL]
Deacon, T.W
(1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the Brain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Denny, J.P
(1978) Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis. In D.F. Farkas, W.M. Jacobsen, & K.W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon (pp. 71–84). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1982) Semantics of the Inuktitut (Eskimo) spatial deictics. International Journal of American Linguistics, 48(4), 359–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M.C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E
(2005) A crosslinguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 759–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M.S., & Haspelmath, M
(Eds.) (2011) The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Ellefson, M.R., & Christiansen, M.H
(2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In L.R. Gleitman & A.K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 645–650). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ember, C.R., & Ember, M
(2007) Climate, econiche, and sexuality: Influences on sonority in language. American Anthropologist, 109(1), 180–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J
(Ed.) (2004) Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N
(2003) Bininj Gun-Wok: A Pan-Dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune (2 Volumes). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C
(2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, D.L
(2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language, 85(2), 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frigo, L., & McDonald, J.L
(1998) Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 218–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H
(2004) The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, D
(2009) How much grammar does it take to sail a boat? In G. Sampson, D. Gil, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable (pp. 19–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.G
(Ed.) (2005) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Fifteenth Edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hockett, C.F
(1966) The problem of universals in language. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language, 2nd Edition, Volume 2 (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, E
(2003) The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–1378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V.A., & Fernald, A
(2008) Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science, 11(6), F31–F39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S
(2002) Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imaizumi, H., Kunimatsu, S., & Isei, T
(2000) Sound propagation and speech transmission in a branching underground tunnel. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(2), 632–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, E., & Demers, R.A
(1994) Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language, 70(4), 697–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1922) Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allan & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnston, J.R., & Wong, M.-Y
A (2002) Cultural differences in beliefs and practices concerning talk to children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(5), 916–926. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, R
(1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. (B. Nerlich, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K.D., Shutts, K., DeJesus, J., & Spelke, E.S
(2009) Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S.A
(1979) Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, 50(1), 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H
(2002) The minimalist program in syntax. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 432–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(2003) Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 25–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C., & Wilkins, D.P
(2006) Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R.L
(1996) Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 93–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R
(2010) Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B
(1983) Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12(5), 467–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I., Bhattacharya, T., Smith, D.E., & Croft, W
(2011) Geographical distribution of phonological complexity. Linguistic Typology, 15(2), 267–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J.H
(2001) The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2-3), 125–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) What happened to English? Diachronica, 19(2), 217–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J
(2004) Bioacoustics of human whistled languages: An alternative approach to the cognitive processes of language. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 76(2), 406–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M
(1984) How to avoid subordination. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 493–509). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A
(2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D
(1996) Language diversity in West Africa: An ecological approach. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 15(4), 403–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998a) Coevolution of phonology and the lexicon in twelve languages of West Africa. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5(3), 240–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 17(4), 354–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M.A., Komarova, N.L., & Niyogi, P
(2001) Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291(5501), 114–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R.D
(1992) Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piatelli-Palmarini, M., & Uriagereka, J
(2004) The immune syntax: The evolution of the language virus. In L. Jenkins (Ed.), Variation and Universals in biolinguistics (pp. 341–377). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Pinker, S
(1994) The language instinct. New York, NY: Harper Collins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P
(1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Premack, D
(1986) Gavagai! or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richman, A.L., Miller, P.M., & LeVine, R.A
(1992) Cultural and educational variations in maternal responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 614–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P
(2009) Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, E
(1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I
(1979) Psycholinguistics, 2nd Edition . Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.Google Scholar
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1997) The universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In E. Wanner & L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I., & Bever, T.G
(1982) Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
St. Clair, M.C., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M
(2009) Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and drammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Song, L., Leavell, A.S., Kahana-Kalman, R., & Yoshikawa, H
(2012) Ethnic differences in mother-infant language and gestural communications are associated with specific skills in infants: Mother-infant communications. Developmental Science, 15(3), 384–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, L.C
(1987) A vietnamese reference grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, W.R
(1989) How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In R. Harlow & R. Cooper (Eds.), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (pp. 555–579). Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P
(1988) On the role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Dialectology. Regional and social (pp. 547–563). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Contact and isolation in linguistic change. In L.E. Breivik & E.H. Jahr (Eds.), Language change: Contributions to the study of its causes (pp. 227–238). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Dialect typology: Phonological aspects. In G. Aurrekoetxea & X. Videgain (Eds.), Nazioarteko Dialektologia Blitzarra: Agiriak / Actas del congreso internacional de dialectología (pp. 659–666). Bilbao: Euskaltzainda.Google Scholar
(2001a) Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology, 5(2-3), 371–374.Google Scholar
(2001b) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society, Fourth Edition. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vogt, P., & Mastin, J.D
(2013) Rural and urban differences in language socialization and early vocabulary development in Mozambique. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, M. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3787–3792). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Weiner, J
(1995) The beak of the Finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar
White, D.R
(2007) Standard cross-cultural sample free distribution site (UC Irvine): Comparative research, world cultural comparison, courses and workshops. Retrieved 31 March 2009 from [URL]
Wray, A., & Grace, G.W
(2007) The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117(3), 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lewis, Molly, Aoife Cahill, Nitin Madnani & James Evans
2023. Local similarity and global variability characterize the semantic space of human languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120:51 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.