Article published in:Language Structure and Environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors
Edited by Rik De Busser and Randy J. LaPolla
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts 6] 2015
► pp. 289–316
Chapter 11. The role of adaptation in understanding linguistic diversity
The 6,000–7,000 languages spoken by people display a dazzling variety of sounds, word patterns, and grammatical forms. The dominant explanation for this diversity is that languages drift apart as communities separate. The accumulation of random changes eventually produces languages that are mutually unintelligible. We argue that in addition to this non-functional process of drift, language change and diversification can be explained in functional terms as adaptations to social, demographic, and ecological environments in which the languages are learned and used, a proposal we call the linguistic niche hypothesis. We support our position with a series of agent-based models that serve as an existence proof for why language diversity requires adaptation. We next discuss empirical evidence for a link between aspects of socio-demographic factors, ecological factors, and grammatical structure which strongly suggests adaptation to be at work. One mechanism we focus on is language learnability: while all languages need to be learnable by infants, only some languages are further constrained by adult learning biases. Thus, languages which for historical reasons have adult learners adapt to be more learnable by adults. As a result, languages spoken in larger and more heterogeneous environments in which adult language learning is more likely to take place tend to be grammatically simpler than languages spoken in small homogeneous environments. The linguistic niche hypothesis outlined in this chapter, while still in early stages, promises to shed light on longstanding questions such as why there are so many languages, and why they differ so substantially from one another.
(1964) Labyrinths: Selected stories & other writings. New York, NY: New Directions Publishing.
(1998) The minimalist program and a perfect syntax: A critical notice of Noam Chomsky’s The Minimalist Program. Mind and Language, 13(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468‑0017.00074
(2006) Towards an ecology of world languages. Cambridge: Polity.
(1962) An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Chater, N., Reali, F., & Christiansen, M.H.
(2009) Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(4), 1015–1020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807191106
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N.
(2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004998
(2002) Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840579
Crowley, T., & Bowern, C.
(2010) An introduction to historical linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2004) The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.71
Dale, R., & Lupyan, G.
(2012) Understanding the origins of morphological diversity: The linguistic niche hypothesis. Advances in Complex Systems, 15(3), 1150017–1–1150017–16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911500172
(2013, April). Corpus of global web-based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE). Brighman Young University. Online Corpus. Retrieved 15 September 2013 from corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/
(1997) The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the Brain. London: Penguin.
(1978) Locating the universals in lexical systems for spatial deixis. In D.F. Farkas, W.M. Jacobsen, & K.W. Todrys (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon (pp. 71–84). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
(1982) Semantics of the Inuktitut (Eskimo) spatial deictics. International Journal of American Linguistics, 48(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1086/465747
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M.C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E.
(2005) A crosslinguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 759–786. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905007105
Dryer, M.S., & Haspelmath, M.
(Eds.) (2011) The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Retrieved from wals.info/
Ellefson, M.R., & Christiansen, M.H.
(2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In L.R. Gleitman & A.K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 645–650). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ember, C.R., & Ember, M.
(2007) Climate, econiche, and sexuality: Influences on sonority in language. American Anthropologist, 109(1), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.1.180
(Ed.) (2004) Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266500.001.0001
(2003) Bininj Gun-Wok: A Pan-Dialectal Grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku and Kune (2 Volumes). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C.
(2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
(2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology, 46(4), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/431525
(2009) Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language, 85(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0092
Frigo, L., & McDonald, J.L.
(1998) Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(2), 218–245. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2569
Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H.
(2004) The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012‑16188.8.131.52
(2009) How much grammar does it take to sail a boat? In G. Sampson, D. Gil, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable (pp. 19–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(Ed.) (2005) Ethnologue: Languages of the world, Fifteenth Edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Retrieved from archive.ethnologue.com/15/
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R.
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
(1966) The problem of universals in language. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language, 2nd Edition, Volume 2 (pp. 1–29). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2003) The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467‑8624.00612
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V.A., & Fernald, A.
(2008) Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science, 11(6), F31–F39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00768.x
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S.
(2002) Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45(3), 337–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010‑0285(02)00500‑5
Imaizumi, H., Kunimatsu, S., & Isei, T.
(2000) Sound propagation and speech transmission in a branching underground tunnel. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(2), 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429595
Jelinek, E., & Demers, R.A.
(1994) Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language, 70(4), 697–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/416325
(1922) Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allan & Unwin.
Johnston, J.R., & Wong, M.-Y.
A (2002) Cultural differences in beliefs and practices concerning talk to children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(5), 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092‑4388(2002/074)
(1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. ( B. Nerlich, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Kinzler, K.D., Shutts, K., DeJesus, J., & Spelke, E.S.
(2009) Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623
(1979) Evidence for a language learning strategy: On the relative ease of acquisition of prefixes and suffixes. Child Development, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑8624.1979.tb02972.x
(2002) The minimalist program in syntax. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)01977‑0
(2003) Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (pp. 25–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S.C., & Wilkins, D.P.
(2006) Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486753
(1996) Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708421
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R.
(2010) Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559
(1983) Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12(5), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068027
Maddieson, I., Bhattacharya, T., Smith, D.E., & Croft, W.
(2011) Geographical distribution of phonological complexity. Linguistic Typology, 15(2), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.020
(2001) The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology, 5(2-3), 125–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001
(2002) What happened to English? Diachronica, 19(2), 217–272. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19.2.02wha
(2007) Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309805.001.0001
(2004) Bioacoustics of human whistled languages: An alternative approach to the cognitive processes of language. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 76(2), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001‑37652004000200033
(1984) How to avoid subordination. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 493–509). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A.
(2011) The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022924
(1996) Language diversity in West Africa: An ecological approach. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 15(4), 403–438. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1996.0015
(1998a) Coevolution of phonology and the lexicon in twelve languages of West Africa. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5(3), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179808590132
(1998b) Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 17(4), 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1998.0328
Nowak, M.A., Komarova, N.L., & Niyogi, P.
(2001) Evolution of universal grammar. Science, 291(5501), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5501.114
(1992) Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.24
Piatelli-Palmarini, M., & Uriagereka, J.
(2004) The immune syntax: The evolution of the language virus. In L. Jenkins (Ed.), Variation and Universals in biolinguistics (pp. 341–377). Oxford: Elsevier.
(1994) The language instinct. New York, NY: Harper Collins. https://doi.org/10.1037/e412952005‑009
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P.
(1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–784. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00081061
(1986) Gavagai! or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Richman, A.L., Miller, P.M., & LeVine, R.A.
(1992) Cultural and educational variations in maternal responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012‑16184.108.40.2064
Sampson, G., Gil, D., & Trudgill, P.
(2009) Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1921) Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & World.
(1979) Psycholinguistics, 2nd Edition. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
(1997) The universal, the typological, and the particular in acquisition. In E. Wanner & L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Slobin, D.I., & Bever, T.G.
(1982) Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010‑0277(82)90033‑6
St. Clair, M.C., Monaghan, P., & Ramscar, M.
(2009) Relationships between language structure and language learning: The suffixing preference and drammatical categorization. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01065.x
Tamis-LeMonda, C.S., Song, L., Leavell, A.S., Kahana-Kalman, R., & Yoshikawa, H.
(2012) Ethnic differences in mother-infant language and gestural communications are associated with specific skills in infants: Mother-infant communications. Developmental Science, 15(3), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2012.01136.x
(1987) A vietnamese reference grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
(1989) How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In R. Harlow & R. Cooper (Eds.), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (pp. 555–579). Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.
(1988) On the role of dialect contact and interdialect in linguistic change. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Dialectology. Regional and social (pp. 547–563). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110848137.547
(1989) Contact and isolation in linguistic change. In L.E. Breivik & E.H. Jahr (Eds.), Language change: Contributions to the study of its causes (pp. 227–238). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853063.227
(1993) Dialect typology: Phonological aspects. In G. Aurrekoetxea & X. Videgain (Eds.), Nazioarteko Dialektologia Blitzarra: Agiriak / Actas del congreso internacional de dialectología (pp. 659–666). Bilbao: Euskaltzainda.
(2001a) Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology, 5(2-3), 371–374.
(2001b) Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society, Fourth Edition. London: Penguin.
Vogt, P., & Mastin, J.D.
(2013) Rural and urban differences in language socialization and early vocabulary development in Mozambique. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, M. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3787–3792). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(1995) The beak of the Finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York, NY: Vintage.
(2007) Standard cross-cultural sample free distribution site (UC Irvine): Comparative research, world cultural comparison, courses and workshops. Retrieved 31 March 2009 from eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/courses/index.html
Wray, A., & Grace, G.W.
(2007) The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117(3), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005