The article provides a diachronic overview of the discourse of food on the basis of various examples of recipes and more general food related texts, from Old English to the late 20th century. After comparing lexis, syntax and discourse features, three main diachronic tendencies can be observed: first, the focus on a less and less professional audience, second, the gradual introduction of more precise measurements and more procedural detail, and third, an overall reduction in lexical complexity. In addition, some syntactical features remain universal diachronically while others, like the ellipsis of the definite article, are comparatively recent developments. Increasingly frequent is the use of “supporters” and “controllers,” sentences that directly address the reader and provide advice for problematic steps in the procedure and a means to check if these steps were successfully completed. In the most recent examples, more extraneous information, such as health advice, is added. Thus, food discourse is established as a dynamic genre with distinct linguistic developmental patterns.
2021. „Mal kuemel vnd enis mit pfeffer…“ – Wie beginnt ein Rezept? Zur informationsstrukturellen Interaktion von Text- und Satzstruktur in (historischen) Kochrezepten. In Textanfänge [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 13 ff.
2019. ‘You’ll need help from your adult assistant’: Readership accommodation in children’s recipes
. Text & Talk 39:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Bator, Magdalena & Marta Sylwanowicz
2017. Measures in Medieval English Recipes – Culinary Vs. Medical. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Rebechi, Rozane Rodrigues & Márcia Moura da Silva
2017. Brazilian Recipes in Portuguese and English: The Role of Phraseology for Translation. In Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10596], ► pp. 102 ff.
Diemer, Stefan
2016. Sensory adjectives in the discourse of food: a frame-semantic approach to language and perception. The Translator 22:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.