Chapter published in:
Consensus and Dissent: Negotiating Emotion in the Public Space
Edited by Anne Storch
[Culture and Language Use 19] 2017
► pp. 213228
References

References

Austin, P. K.
(2006) Data and language documentation. In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann, & U. Mosel (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation (pp. 87–112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bird, S. & Simons, G.
(2003) Seven dimensions of portability for language documentation and description. Language, 79, 557–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, C.
(2008) Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, A. M.
(2006) Ethics and practicalities of cooperative fieldwork and analysis. In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann, & U. Mosel (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation (31–66). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A.
(2003) Genre, register and language documentation in literate and preliterate communities. In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language documentation and description (Vol. 1; 85–98). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Hellwig, B.
(2010) Meaning and translation in linguistic fieldwork. Studies in Language, 34(4), 802–831. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Lexical aspect classes in Goemai (West Chadic). In D. Löhr & A. Awagana (Eds.), Topics in Chadic linguistics VI (pp.85–100). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
(2012) Lexicalization of property concepts: Evidence for language contact on the southern Jos Plateau (Central Nigeria)? Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 33(1), 67–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
(1998) Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36, 161–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation (pp. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C.
(2001) Language documentation. A program. In W. Bisang (Ed.), Aspects of typology and universals (pp. 84–97). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Lüpke, F.
(2010) Research methods in language documentation. In P. K. Austin (Ed.), Language documentation and description (Vol. 7; pp. 55–104). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
(2001) Who shapes the record: The speaker and the linguist. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 34–54). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohikere, B. J., & Tiemsan, S.
(1999) Notes on the reading and writing of Goemai (trial edition). Jos: GLBT & NBTT.Google Scholar
Reh, M.
(1998) Questionnaire on experiencer constructions in African languages. Hamburg: Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthiopistik. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Reh, M. & Simon, C.
(1999) Experienskonstruktionen in afrikanischen Sprachen. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 52(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
Reh, M., Simon, C., & Koops, K.
(1998) Experiens-Kodierung in afrikanischen Sprachen typologisch gesehen: Formen und ihre Motivierungen. Hamburg: Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthiopistik. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rice, K.
(2001) Learning as one goes. In P. Newman & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic fieldwork (pp. 230–249). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E.
(2006) Linguistic annotation. In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann & U. Mosel (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation (pp. 213–251). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Seifart, F.
(2008) On the representativeness of language documentations. In Peter K. Austin (Ed.), Language documentation and description (Vol. 5; pp. 60–76). London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Sirlinger, E.
(1937) Dictionary of the Goemai language. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Woodbury, A. C.
(2011) Language documentation. In P. K. Austin & J. Sallabank (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages (159–186). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar