Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp. 171193

Full-text

What happens to the basic level in language?
References

References

Archambault, A., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G.
(2000) A natural bias for the basic level?. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 585–590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Atran, S., Estin, P., Coley, J., & Medin, D.
(1997) Generic species and basic levels: Essence and appearance in folk biology. Journal of Ethnobiology, 17(1), 17–43.Google Scholar
Cangelosi, A., & Harnad, S.
(2001) The adaptive advantage of symbolic theft over sensorimotor toil: Grounding language in perceptual categories. Evolution of Communication, 4, 117–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collin, C. A., & McMullen, P. A.
(2005) Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 354–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, B.
(2013) Change in life, change in language. A semantic approach to the history of English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidoff, J.
(2001) Language and perceptual categorization. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 382–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diesendruck, G.
(2003) Categories for names or names for categories? The interplay between domain-specific conceptual structure and language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 759–787. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 191 ]
Geeraerts, D.
(1997) Diachronic prototype semantics. A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensorymotor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glushko, R. J., Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., & Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Categorization in the wild. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 129–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M., Shuff-Bailey, M., Olguin, R., & Ruan, W.
(1995) Young children extend novel words at the basic level: Evidence for the principle of categorical scope. Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 494–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodson, F. E.
(2003) The evolution and function of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Győri, G.
(1996) Historical aspects of categorization. In E. H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods. The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 175–206). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Semantic change as linguistic interpretation of the world. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 71–89). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Symbolic cognition: its evolution and adaptive impact. In G. Győri (Ed.), Language evolution: Biological, linguistic and philosophical perspectives (pp. 113–129). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar
(2002) Semantic change and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 123–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Semantic-lexical change at the crossroads between universals and linguistic relativity. A perspective from cognition and evolution. In W. Mihatsch & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Lexikalische Daten und Universalien des semantischen Wandels / Lexical data and universals of semantic change (pp. 19–37). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Harnad, S.
(1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) To cognize is to categorize. Cognition is categorization. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 20–43). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2006) Language, mind and culture. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G.
(2012a) What do words do? Toward a theory of language-augmented thought. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 57: (pp. 255–297). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The centrality of language in human cognition. Language Learning, 66(3), 516–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
Malt, B. C.
(2015) Words as names for objects, actions, relations, and properties. In J. R. Taylor (Ed.), Handbook of the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 320–333). Google Scholar
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Saji, N., & Majid, A.
(2011) Do words reveal concepts?. In L. Carlson, T. F. Shipley & C. Hoelscher (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 519–524). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mohan, K., & Arun, S. P.
(2012) Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization. Journal of Vision, 12, 19. Crossref.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y.
(2005) The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (10), 468–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
oed Online
March 2017 Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hennon, E. A.
(2006) The birth of words: Ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience. Child Development, 77(2), 266–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quiatt, D., & Reynolds, V.
(1993) Primate behaviour. Information, social knowledge, and the evolution of culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Regier, T., Kemp, C., & Kay, P.
(2015) Word meanings across languages support efficient communication. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 237–263). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L.
(2004) Semantic cognition: a parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA & London, England.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H.
(1978) Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. H., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storms, S., Speelman, D., Geeraerts, D., & Storms, G.
(2015) Within-concept similarities in a taxonomy: a corpus linguistic approach. Language and Cognition, 7(2), 194–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P.
(2000) Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S. R., & Lidz, J. L.
(2006) Early word learning (pp. 299–335). In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 2: Cognition, perception and language. (6th edition) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D.
(2014) From perceptual to language-mediated categorization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20120391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1984) “Apples” are not a “kind of fruit”: The semantics of human categorization. American Ethnologist, 11(2), 313–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zayan, R., & Vauclair, J.
(1998) Categories as paradigms for comparative cognition. Behavioural Processes, 42, 87–99. Crossref[ p. 193 ]Google Scholar