What happens to the basic level in language?
Some theoretical considerations with crosslinguistic examples
It is a common assumption that basic level categories are cognitive units that share perceptual and linguistic characteristics at the same time. They are taken to be perceptual and functional gestalts designated by words that have a special status with regard to lexical development in children and frequency of occurrence and usefulness in everyday communication. Despite this connectedness of the two aspects of the basic level they do not go hand in hand. The perceptual side of basic level categorization is primary to language and exists independently of it. Basic level categories emerge naturally in the human perceptual-cognitive system as a result of our biological make-up in order to facilitate a proper functioning and orientation in our environment. The linguistic side relies on perception but is at the same time determined by several other factors. Basic level designations do not directly represent perceptual information because they contain additional conceptual knowledge reflecting cultural conceptualizations. This dissociation between the two sides can be seen on the one hand in the inconsistencies between perceptual qualities of entities and the way in which these entities are grouped together in linguistic basic level categories. On the other hand it is revealed through crosslinguistic discrepancies in category boundaries as delineated by words that are considered basic level terms and seemingly correspond in their semantics. An explanation of these phenomena requires that we do not handle the basic level as one phenomenon in which the perceptual and linguistic aspects merge but keep the two sides of the basic level apart while paying attention to their specific connections and influences on each other.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Cognition and categorization with and without language
- 3.Language and the basic level of categorization
- 4.Basic level categories vs. basic level terms
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (44)
Archambault, A., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G.
(
2000)
A natural bias for the basic level?. In
L. R. Gleitman &
A. K. Joshi (Eds.),
Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 585–590). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atran, S., Estin, P., Coley, J., & Medin, D.
(
1997)
Generic species and basic levels: Essence and appearance in folk biology.
Journal of Ethnobiology, 17(1), 17–43.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cangelosi, A., & Harnad, S.
Collin, C. A., & McMullen, P. A.
(
2005)
Subordinate-level categorization relies on high spatial frequencies to a greater degree than basic-level categorization.
Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 354–364.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crespo, B.
(
2013)
Change in life, change in language. A semantic approach to the history of English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davidoff, J.
(
2001)
Language and perceptual categorization.
TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 382–387.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diesendruck, G.
(
2003)
Categories for names or names for categories? The interplay between domain-specific conceptual structure and language.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 181, 759–787.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D.
(
1997)
Diachronic prototype semantics. A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeraerts, D.
(
2010)
Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
(
2005)
The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensorymotor system in conceptual knowledge.
Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glushko, R. J., Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., & Barsalou, L. W.
(
2008)
Categorization in the wild.
TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 12(4), 129–135.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golinkoff, R. M., Shuff-Bailey, M., Olguin, R., & Ruan, W.
(
1995)
Young children extend novel words at the basic level: Evidence for the principle of categorical scope.
Developmental Psychology, 31(3), 494–507.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodson, F. E.
(
2003)
The evolution and function of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Győri, G.
(
1996)
Historical aspects of categorization. In
E. H. Casad (Ed.),
Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods. The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 175–206). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Győri, G.
(
2001)
Symbolic cognition: its evolution and adaptive impact. In
G. Győri (Ed.),
Language evolution: Biological, linguistic and philosophical perspectives (pp. 113–129). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Győri, G.
(
2002)
Semantic change and cognition.
Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 123–166.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Győri, G.
(
2004)
Semantic-lexical change at the crossroads between universals and linguistic relativity. A perspective from cognition and evolution. In
W. Mihatsch &
R. Steinberg (Eds.),
Lexikalische Daten und Universalien des semantischen Wandels / Lexical data and universals of semantic change (pp. 19–37). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S.
(
1990)
The symbol grounding problem.
Physica D 42, 335–346.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S.
(
2005)
To cognize is to categorize. Cognition is categorization. In
H. Cohen &
C. Lefebvre (Eds.),
Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 20–43). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z.
(
2006)
Language, mind and culture. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
(
1987)
Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W.
(
1987)
Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lupyan, G.
(
2012a)
What do words do? Toward a theory of language-augmented thought. In
B. H. Ross (Ed.),
The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 571: (pp. 255–297). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lupyan, G.
(
2012b)
Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: The label-feedback hypothesis.
Frontiers in Psychology, 31, Article 54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lupyan, G.
(
2016)
The centrality of language in human cognition.
Language Learning, 66(3), 516–553.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malt, B. C.
(
2015)
Words as names for objects, actions, relations, and properties. In
J. R. Taylor (Ed.),
Handbook of the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 320–333).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malt, B. C., Ameel, E., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Saji, N., & Majid, A.
(
2011)
Do words reveal concepts?. In
L. Carlson,
T. F. Shipley &
C. Hoelscher (Eds.),
Proceedings of the thirty-third annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 519–524). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mohan, K., & Arun, S. P.
(
2012)
Similarity relations in visual search predict rapid visual categorization.
Journal of Vision, 12, 19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y.
(
2005)
The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception.
TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (10), 468–473.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
oed Online
March 2017 Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hennon, E. A.
(
2006)
The birth of words: Ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience.
Child Development, 77(2), 266–280.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quiatt, D., & Reynolds, V.
(
1993)
Primate behaviour. Information, social knowledge, and the evolution of culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Regier, T., Kemp, C., & Kay, P.
(
2015)
Word meanings across languages support efficient communication. In
B. MacWhinney &
W. O’Grady (Eds.),
The handbook of language emergence (pp. 237–263). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L.
(
2004)
Semantic cognition: a parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA & London, England.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. H.
(
1978)
Principles of categorization. In
E. Rosch &
B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),
Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosch, E. H., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(
1976)
Basic objects in natural categories.
Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Storms, S., Speelman, D., Geeraerts, D., & Storms, G.
(
2015)
Within-concept similarities in a taxonomy: a corpus linguistic approach.
Language and Cognition, 7(2), 194–218.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M.
(
1999)
The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P.
(
2000)
Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits.
Brain and Language, 751, 195–231.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waxman, S. R., & Lidz, J. L.
(
2006)
Early word learning (pp. 299–335). In
D. Kuhn &
R. Siegler (Eds.),
Handbook of child psychology. Volume 2: Cognition, perception and language. (6th edition) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westermann, G., & Mareschal, D.
(
2014)
From perceptual to language-mediated categorization.
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20120391.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A.
(
1984)
“Apples” are not a “kind of fruit”: The semantics of human categorization.
American Ethnologist, 11(2), 313–328.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zayan, R., & Vauclair, J.
(
1998)
Categories as paradigms for comparative cognition.
Behavioural Processes, 421, 87–99.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.