Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp.194–215

Leader metaphors in Ekegusii language

 | Kisii University (Kenya)
 | Southwest University (China)
This is a cognitive linguistic study of a cultural-specific metaphor of a leader in Ekegusii, an African Bantu language in Kenya. A descriptive research design was used whereby the natives were asked to identify and explain the Ekegusii leader metaphorical terms and phrases, describe the social cultural values and to account for the cognitive mapping processes involved. The data collected were analyzed using the Cognitive Metaphor Theory (CMT) of Lakoff and Johnson (1980). The results show that a leader in Ekegusii is conceptualized as a plant, animal, object or the behavior the leader exhibits (also act as X domains). It was also found out that context, values, attitude of the speaker and cultural knowledge play a major role in interpreting and understanding Ekegusii leader metaphors. The study concludes by suggesting further research of metaphors in African and other languages to enable comparisons.
Keywords: metaphor, cognitive linguistics, categorization, leader, Ekegusii
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical foundations: Conceptual metaphor theory
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results and discussion
  • 5.Values mapped
    • A.Size, strength and courage
    • B.Wisdom, foresight and vision
    • C.Fierceness
    • D.Cooperation and development consciousness
    • E.Immorality and selfishness
    • F.Age
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 16 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00002.onc
References (33)
References
Aristotle, (Trans. by Rhys Roberts). (1954). Rhetoric. New York: The Modern Library, Random House.Google Scholar
Azuma, M. (2012). English native speakers’ interpretation of culture-bound Japanese figurative expressions. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García and A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (381), 195–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosire, F. (1993). “Dialects rogoro and maate ”. University of Nairobi: Unpublished MA Thesis.Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (Enlarged ed.). (1972). Language and mind. New York, MIT: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (1986). Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2007). Electrifying results: ERP data and cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. (pp. 400–423). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Why cognitive linguists should care more about empirical methods. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp.2–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. S. Jr., (1961). An Introduction to descriptive linguistics. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation vs. resemblance, In R. Gibbs and G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, M. (1964).The classification of Bantu languages. London: Dawson’s Pall Mall Publishers.Google Scholar
Hiraga, M. (1993). Shoohintositenojosee: metafaanimirarerujoseekan. (Women as goods: views on women seen in metaphors), Nihongogaku, 5 (12), 213–233.Google Scholar
Jäkel, O. (2002). Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. Metaphorik.de, 2(1), 20–42.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, R. J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2004). Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of an embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 191, 51–75 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mac Cormac, E. R. (1985). A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2007). Gesture and thought, by D. McNeill. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (3), 281–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mugenda, O. & Mugenda, A. (1999). Research methodology: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.Google Scholar
Nyakoe, D. G., Matu, P. M. and Ongarora, D. O. (2012). Conceptualization of death is a Journey and death is a rest Euphemism. Theory and practice in language studies, 2 (7), 1452–1457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philip, G. (2012). Locating metaphor in specialized corpora using raw frequency and key word lists. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García and A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (381), 85–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Advances in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1–72). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. (2013). Metaphor. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rouhi, M. (2011). Animal metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Iran: David Publishing House.Google Scholar
Takada, M., Shinohara, M., Morizumi, F. and Sato, G. (2006). A study of metaphorical mapping involving socio-cultural values: How a woman is conceptualized in Japanese. In Husby, G., Sletten, K. & M. Machaelson, (Eds.), Scandinavian journal of immunology, (21), 394–404.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. (1994). Detachable women: Gender and kinship in process of socioeconomic change among the Gusii of Kenya. American ethnologist, 211, 516–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1973). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of East Anglia. Language in Society, (11), 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chen, Chuanhong & Xu Wen
2024. Metaphorical richness. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:2 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Wen, Xu & Chuanhong Chen
2021. Cultural conceptualisations ofloong(龙) in Chinese idioms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.