Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp. 313329

Full-text

Compiling a cognition-based thematic monolingual lexicon
References

References

Atkins, S., Rundell, M., & Sato, H.
(2003) The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 333–357.Google Scholar
Atkins, B., & Rundell, M.
(2008) The Oxford guide to practical lexicography. Oxford University Press.‏Google Scholar
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Cronin, B.
(2003) The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 281–296.‏ CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C., Fillmore, C., & Lowe, J.
(1998) The berkeley framenet project. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, (pp. 86–90). Association for Computational Linguistics.‏ CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertoldi, A., & de Oliveira Chishman, R. L.
(2011) Developing a frame-based lexicon for the Brazilian legal language: the case of the criminal_process frame. In International Workshop on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems, 256–270.Google Scholar
De Cao, D., Croce, D., & Basili, R.
(2010) Extensive Evaluation of a FrameNet-WordNet mapping resource. Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation, Malta: ELRA.Google Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M.
(2006) Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.‏Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
(1975) ‘An alternative to checklist theories of meaning’, Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Amsterdam: North Holland, 123–31.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. and Baker, C.
(2010) A frames approach to semantic analysis. In B. Heine and H. Narrog, (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, (pp. 313–340). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 329 ]
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R.
(2003a) Background to framenet. International journal of lexicography, 16(3), 235–250.‏ CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C., Petruck, M., Ruppenhofer, J., & Wright, A.
(2003) FrameNet in action: The case of attaching. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 297–332 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostermann, C.
(2012) Cognitive lexicography of emotion terms. Proceedings of the 15th EURALEX International Congress, 493–501.Google Scholar
(2015) Cognitive lexicography: A new approach to lexicography making use of cognitive semantics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) Framenet II: Extended theory and practice. URL http://​framenet​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/book​/book​.pdf.‏
Schmidt, T.
(2007) The kicktionary: A multilingual resource of the language of football. Data Structures for Linguistic Resources and Applications. Gunter Narr, Tübingen, Germany, 189–196.‏Google Scholar
(2009) The Kicktionary–A Multilingual Lexical Resource of Football Language.‏ In H. Boas (Ed.), Multilingual FrameNets: Methods and Applications. (245–286). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Subirats, C., & Petruck, M.
(2003) Surprise: Spanish FrameNet. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Frame Semantics at the XVII. International Congress of Linguists, Prague.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Essam, Bacem A., Mostafa M. Aref & Fayrouz Fouad
2019. When folkloric geopolitical concerns prompt a conspiratorial ideation: the case of Egyptian tweeters. GeoJournal 84:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.