Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 6:2 (2019) ► pp.325–353

An integrated study of visual metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons

| North China Electric Power University

Conceptual metaphor theory highlights that metaphor is a matter of thinking. This assumption indicates that metaphors exist not only in language, but also in other modes. This study examines uses of visual and visual-verbal metaphors in 50 Chinese editorial cartoons conceptualizing serious haze problem, with the intention of eliciting implicit meaning conveyed by visual signs alone or together with verbal texts. Both conceptual and critical discourse analysis of the metaphors are conducted. The study finds that the way a metaphor is realized visually and verbally in a cartoon determines the features mapped onto the topic, and further implicitly expresses a critical stance toward the topic under discussion. The metaphors in the cartoons evoke a general understanding of haze problem by activating the war scenario and familiar cultural or social context in viewers. It is found in this corpus that visual fusion and visual replacement are the most frequent kinds of visual metaphors. The study further affirms that visual metaphors are better in conveying rich and implicit conceptual and affective meaning, and can be direct manifestation of the conceptual metaphor without the mediation of language. In sum the study suggests the need for an integrated approach to visual metaphoric representation in multimodal analysis.

Keywords: visual metaphor, war scenario, critical multimodal discourse analysis, editorial cartoons
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Target domain: haze
    • 4.2Target domain: victim
    • 4.3Target domain: stakeholders
    • 4.4Target domain: control action
    • 4.5Others
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1War scenario
    • 5.2Visual techniques and verbal messages
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00043.niu
References
Aldrich, V. C.
(1968) Visual metaphor. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 21, 73–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R.
(1977) Image, music, text. Transl. by Stephen Heath. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. A.
(2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, S.
(2004) Drawing Tony. The Guardian, 17 July, 11.Google Scholar
Bortoluzzi, M.
(2009) Towards a framework of critical multimodal analysis: Emotion in a film trailer. In A. Esposito & R. Vích (Eds.), Cross-modal analysis (pp. 50–62). Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bounegru, L. & Forceville, C.
(2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10 (2), 209–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brooks, P. H.
(1977) The role of action lines in children’s memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 231, 98–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(1999) Operationalizing “metaphor” for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron, & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N.
(1996) A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics, 26 (6), 809–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Refaie, E.
(2003) Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 21, 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Metaphors in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(2005) Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in discourse analysis (pp. 53–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2006) Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. In I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp. 19–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1994) Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9 (1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forcevillie, C.
(2002) The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2008) Metaphors in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: Charting the field. In K. Fahlenbrach (Ed.), Embodied metaphors in film, television and video games: Cognitive approaches (pp. 17–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. B.
(1988) Museum of the mind: An inquiry into the titling of artworks. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3 (3), 157–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E.
(2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1189–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(2008) Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, E. H.
(1971) The cartoonist’s armoury. In E. H. Gombrich (Ed.), Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art (pp. 127–142). London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Hall, S.
(1997) The spectacle of the “other”. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practice (pp. 223–279). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Janzen, T.
(2006) Visual communication: Signed language and cognition. In G. K. M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 359–377). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C.
(2009) An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 14–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(2007) The Meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. M.
(1982) Metaphors in picture. Perception, 111, 589–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metaphor and art. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 447–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. M., Green, C. D., & Vervaeke, J.
(1993) Metaphoric thought and devices in pictures. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8 (3), 243–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, G.
(2000) Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In U. H. Meinhof & J. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media: From genre to everyday life (pp. 132–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Mark, T.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lan, C., & Zuo, D.
(2015) Pictorial-verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World, 11, 20–51.Google Scholar
Lassen, I., Strunck, J., & Vestergaard, T.
(2006) Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, F. V.
(2004) Developing an integrative multi-semiotic Model. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis, (pp. 220–245). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lin, T. Y., & Chiang, W.
(2015) Multimodal fusion in analyzing political cartoons: Debates on U.S. beef imports into Taiwan. Metaphor and Symbol, 301, 137–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P.
(2016) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A Corpus-based account. Metaphor and symbol, 31 (2), 73–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. F.
(2004) Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing theory, 41, 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A.
(2009) Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 213–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suler, J., & Zakia, R. D.
(2018) Perception and imaging: Photography as a way of seeing. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Teng, N. Y., & Sun, S.
(2002) Grouping, simile, and oxymoron in pictures: A design-based cognitive approach. Metaphor and Symbol, 17 (4), 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–118). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yus, F.
(2009) Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 147–172). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar