Article published in:
Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1] 2020
► pp. 3157


(Trans. by C. D. C. Reeve) (2018) Rhetoric. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Baxandall, M.
(1985) Patterns of intentions: On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Black, M.
(1955) Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Vernillo, P.
(2019) How abstract concepts emerge from metaphorical images: The metonymic way. Language and Communication, 69, 26–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., & Aina, L.
(2017) Similarity is closeness: Using distributional semantic spaces to model similarity in visual and linguistic metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M.
(2017) Using semantic features norms to investigate how the visual and verbal modes afford metaphor construction and expression. Language and Cognition, 9(3), 525–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Modeling semantic similarity between metaphor terms of visual vs linguistic metaphors through Flickr tag distributions. Frontiers in Communication, 1 (9).Google Scholar
Borst, G., & Kosslyn, S. M.
(2008) Visual mental imagery and visual perception: Structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes. Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 849–862. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A.
(1996) Pictures, words and the brain. Nature, 383(6597), 216–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N.
(1994) Visual metaphor. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Aspects of metaphor (pp. 189–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Repr. in N. Carroll (2001), Beyond aesthetics: Philosophical essays (pp. 347–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cavazzana, A.
(2017) Il ruolo cognitivo della metafora in Arthur C. Danto [The cognitive role of metaphor in Arthur C. Danto’s approach]. Estetica. Studi e ricerche, 7(1), 57–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Imagining: The role of mental imagery in the interpretation of visual metaphors. In A. Benedek & K. Nyíri (Eds.), Perspectives on visual learning, vol. 3: Image and metaphor in the new century (pp. 71–82). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences/Budapest University of Technology and Economics.Google Scholar
Cuccio, V.
(2018) Attention to metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. C.
(1981) The transfiguration of the commonplace. A philosophy of art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
(1967) Truth and meaning. Synthese, 17(3), 304–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1974) On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1977) The method of truth in metaphysics. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, 244–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) A nice derangement of epitaphs. In R. Grandy & R. Warner (Eds.), Philosophical grounds of rationality (pp. 156–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Houwer, J., & Hermans, D.
(1994) Differences in the affective processing of words and pictures. Cognition and Emotion, 8(1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. A., Pinker, S., & Farah, M. J.
(1989) Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental images. Cognitive Science, 13(1), 51–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ganis, G., & Schendan, H. E.
(2011) Visual imagery. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2, 239–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, W. R.
(1992) Picture naming. Cognition, 42(1–3), 61–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, E. H.
(1963) Visual metaphors of value in art. In E. H. Gombrich (1978), Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art (pp. 12–29). London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, J. A. et al.
(2009) Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 173–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, J.
(2006) The objective eye. Color, form, and reality in the theory of art. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F.
(1991) A Theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 141–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M., Behrmann, M., & Jeannerod, M.
(1995) The cognitive neuroscience of mental imagery. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1335–1344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J., & Alpert, N. M.
(1995) Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 378, 496–498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, T. S., & Nguyen, M.
(2001) Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(4), 1907–1911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mairal, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F.
(2009) Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. In C. Butler & J. Martin Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (153–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G.
(1964) Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives [Amodal completions of perceptual structures]. Studia Psychologica. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Nanay, B.
(2010) Perception and imagination: Amodal perception as mental imagery. Philosophical Studies, 150, 239–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016a) Aesthetics as philosophy of perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016b) Imagination and perception. In A. Kind (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of imagination (124–134). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018) The Importance of amodal completion in everyday perception. i-Perception, 9, 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming). Perception and the arts. In C. Mag Uidhir Ed. Art and philosophy Oxford Oxford University Press
Ortony, A.
(1979) Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86(3), 161–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A.
(1971) Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
(2010) Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon, 5, 205–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panofsky, E.
(1939) Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. Boulder: Westview Press (1972).Google Scholar
Pérez Sobrino, P.
(2017) Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., & Bolognesi, M.
(2019) Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., & Zlatev, J.
(2019) A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics, 12 (1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The Paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2018) Visual metaphor: Structure and process. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J. et al.
(2010) A Method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taikh, A., Hargreaves, I. S., Yap, M. J. & Pexman, P. M.
(2015) Semantic classification of pictures and words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68 (8), 1502–1518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Mulken, M., Le Pair, R., & Forceville, C.
(2010) The impact of perceived complexity, deviation and comprehension on the appreciation of visual metaphor in advertising across three European countries. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3418–3430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Mulken, M., van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U.
(2014) Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(4), 333–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar