Applications of visual and linguistic metaphor
Rendering, generalization and variation
On the use of multiple parallel texts as a comparative method in cognitive poetics
The article presents a case study of how the use of multiple parallel texts may be employed as a useful research
method in cognitive poetics, using the English version of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through
the Looking-Glass and its four published Czech versions as the samples. In the analysis, we examine the language of
space in alternative verbalizations of the same literary scene across languages (English and Czech) and within the target language
(Czech), and the different mental images invoked by the different ways of verbalizing the same scene. Our analysis shows that the
use of multiple parallel texts can be a helpful research method in cognitive poetics, in the sense that the method is capable of
providing naturalistic and representative linguistic evidence of how languages systematically differ, even for a domain as basic
as space.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and method
- 3.How the systems are similar
- 4.When the systems differ: Flexibility and irreducible difference
- 4.1Multiple parallel texts as a window to human cognitive flexibility
- 4.2Diachrony in multiple parallel texts as a key to identifying an irreducible difference between languages
- 5.Towards the use of multiple parallel texts as a method in comparative cognitive poetics
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
(
1987)
Five
ways of learning how to talk about events: A cross-linguistic study of children’s
narratives. Cognitive Science Program, Institute of Cognitive Studies, University of California at Berkeley.

Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
(
1994)
Relating
events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bowerman, M. & Pederson, E.
(
1992)
Topological
relations picture series. In Cross- linguistic studies of spatial
semantic organization.
Annual report of the Max Planck Institute for
Psycholinguistics, 53–56.

Brône, Geert & Vandaele, J.
(
2009)
Cognitive
poetics: Goals, gains and gaps. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Carroll, L.
(
1902)
Malé
Elišky země divů a příhod. (
J. Váňa, Trans.). Praha: Alois Hynek. (Original work published 1865)

Carroll, L.
(
1904)
Kouzelnýkraj. (
J. Houdek, Trans.). Praha: J. R. Vilímek. (Original work published 1865)

Carroll, L.
(
1931)
Alenčinadobrodružství
v říšidivů. (
J. Císař, Trans.). Praha: František Borový. (Original work published 1865)

Carroll, L.
(
1931)
Alenčinadobrodružství
v říšidivů a zazrcadlem. (
J. Císař, Trans.) Praha: Fr. Borový

Carroll, L.
(
1961)
Alenka
v krajidivů a zazrcadlem. (
A. Skoumal &
H. Skoumalová, Trans.) Praha: SNDK.

Carroll, L.
(
1961)
Alenka
v kraji divů (
A. Skoumal &
H. Skoumalová, Trans.). Praha: SNDK. (Original
work published 1865)

Carroll, L.
(
2000)
Alice’s
adventures in wonderland. New York: New American Library.

Clark, H.
(
1973)
Space,
time, semantics, and the child. In
T. E. Moore (Ed.),
Cognitive
development and the acquisition of
language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.


Fillmore, C.
(
1968)
The
case for case. In
E. Bach &
R. T. Harns (Eds.),
Universals
in linguistic
theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Firbas, J.
(
1992)
Functional
sentence perspective in written and spoken
communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Gavins, J., & Steen, G.
(
2003)
Cognitive
poetics in
practice. London: Routledge.


Goldberg, A. E.
(
2006)
Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gruber, J. S.
(
1965)
Studies
in lexical relations (Doctoral Dissertation). Reprinted as part
of
Lexical structures in syntax and
semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Jackendoff, R.
(
1983)
Semantics
and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R.
(
1993) “
What”
and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition.
Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 161, 217–265.


Langacker, W. R.
(
1991)
Foundations
of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive
application, Vol. II1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, W. R.
(
1995)
The symbolic alternative. In
H. Kardela,
G. Persson (Eds.),
New Trends in Semantics and Lexicography (pp. 89–118). Umea: Swedish Science Press.

Leech, G. N. & Short, M.
(
1981)
Style
in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional
prose. London: Longman.

Levinson, S. C.
(
2003)
Space
in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive
diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Lu, W. & Verhagen, A.
(
2016)
Shifting
viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text
analysis. In
B. Dancygier,
W. Lu &
A. Verhagen (Eds.),
Viewpoint
and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and
modalities (pp. 169–190). Berlin: De Gruyter.


Lu, W.
(
2019)
Time,
tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A Multiple-Parallel-Text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless
language.
Cognitive
Linguistics, 30(2), 377–397.


Lu, W., Shurma, S., & Kemmer, S.
Lu, W., Verhagen, A., & Su, I.
(
2018)
A
Multiple-Parallel-Text approach for viewpoint research across languages: The case of demonstratives in English and
Chinese. In
Szilvia Csábi (Ed.),
Expressive
minds and artistic creations: Studies in cognitive
poetics (pp. 131–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rambousek, Jiří
(
2015)
Czech [1904]. Czech 1901. Back-translation and notes. In
Jon A. Lindseth and
Alan Tannenbaum (Eds.).
Alice in a world of wonderlands: The translations of Lewis Carroll’s masterpiece (Volume 21: Back translations), 151–156. Delaware: Oak.

Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.
Slobin, D. I.
(
1996)
Two
ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In
M. Shibatani &
S. A. Thompson (Eds.),
Grammatical
constructions: Their form and
meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Stockwell, P.
(
2002)
Cognitive
poetics: An
introduction. London: Routledge.

Strnadová, Z.
(
2006)
Předložky. In
L. Dušková,
et al. (Eds.),
Mluvnicesoučasné
angličtinynapozadíčeštiny (pp. 273–302). Praha, CZ: Academia.

Tabakowska, E.
(
1993)
Cognitive
linguistics and poetics of translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Talmy, L.
(
1983)
How
language structures space. In
H. L. Pick Jr., &
L. P. Acreo (Eds.),
Spatial
orientation: Theory, research, and
application (pp. 225–282). New York: Plenum Press.


Talmy, L.
(
2000)
Toward
a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Taylor, J. R.
(
2012)
The
mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.


Tsur, R.
(
2008)
Toward
a theory of cognitive poetics. Brighton and Portland: Sussex Academic Press.

Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
(
2001)
Reconsidering
prepositional polysemy networks: The case of
over
.
Language, 77(4), 724–765.


Verhagen, A.
(
2012)
Construal
and stylistics – within a language, across contexts, across languages.
Stylistics across
disciplines:Conference proceedings (CD-ROM). Leiden.

Zhang, Y., Segalowitz, N. & Gatbonton, E.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Bogaards, Maarten
2022.
The Discovery of Aspect: A Heuristic Parallel Corpus Study of Ingressive, Continuative and Resumptive Viewpoint Aspect.
Languages 7:3
► pp. 158 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 october 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.