Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Aspects of Information Structure and Flow
Edited by Wei-lun Lu and Jirí Lukl
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2] 2020
► pp. 334–356

Narrative viewpoint and subjective construal across languages

English inversion, associated strategies and their Chinese renditions in multiple parallel texts

| Masaryk University
The present study explores the viewpointing function of word order inversion and associated stylistic strategies across languages, comparing English-Chinese multiple parallel texts as illustration. In particular, I investigate whether the cognitive strategy of inverting the word order to create a subjective construal is similar in both languages, to what extent, and if the languages differ, what systematic contingency plans there are. To answer the question, I examined selected excerpts with inversion written in English and their multiple translations in Mandarin Chinese, to see how the subjective construals in the English originals are rendered. I find that in addition to inversion, the English samples exhibit a zoom-in effect through use of punctuation, the participial clause, and an ad hoc schema of [some] – [X] with the middle three instantiations sharing an identical phonological schema. The identical phonological schema and the shared narrative viewpoint makes the three instantiations iconic. In comparison, the Chinese renditions employ the presentative construction and a focus particle to approximate the character-based viewpoint, but the zoom-in effect is not present in any of the Chinese versions. Another important difference is the generally longer iconic part in the Chinese versions, due to the productivity of four-character templates at the phonological pole in Mandarin Chinese.
Keywords: constructional schema, iconicity, phonological pole, subjective construal, translation
Published online: 01 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00060.lu
References

References

Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(eds.) (2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Biq, Y.-O.
(1988) From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: CAI and JIU in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16, 72–108.Google Scholar
Boas, H. C.
(ed.) (2010) Contrastive studies in construction grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D.
(1977) Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boulin, M.
(2017)  Now and xianzai: A contrastive study of two deictic adverbs. Languages in Contrast 17(1), 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G. & Vandaele, J.
(2009) Cognitive poetics. Goals, gains and gaps. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1992) Immediacy and displacement in consciousness and language. In D. Stein (ed.), Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp. 231–255). Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chen, R.
(2003) English inversion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crespo-Fernández, E.
(2013) Euphemistic metaphors in English and Spanish epitaphs: A comparative study. Atlantis 35(2), 99–118.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B.
(2012) The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., Lu, W. & Verhagen, A.
(eds.) (2016) Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Vandelanotte, L.
(eds.) (2017) Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Special issue of Cognitive Linguistics 28(3).Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, H.
(1997) Inversion in Modern English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drubig, H. B.
(1988) On the discourse function of subject verb inversion. In J. K. D. Nehls (ed.), Essays on the English language and applied linguistics on the occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th birthday (pp. 83–95). Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, M.
(1993) The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. & Steen, G.
(2003) Cognitive poetics in practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2016) Grammar in the context of intersubjective usage. Nederlandse Taalkunde 21(3), 395–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1985) Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W.
(eds.) (2014) Cognitive Grammar in literature. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knotková, M. & Lu, W.
(2020) Rendering, generalization and variation: On the use of multiple parallel texts as a comparative method in cognitive poetics. Cognitive Linguistics Studies 7(1), 201–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Krieken, K., Sanders, J. & Sweetser, E.
(eds.) (2019) Time and viewpoint in narrative discourse. Special issue of Cognitive Linguistics 30(2).Google Scholar
Kuno, S.
(1987) Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lai, H.
(1999) Rejected expectations: The scalar particles cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 37(4), 625–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1), 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N. & Thomson, S. A.
(1976) Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lu, W. & Verhagen, A.
(2016) Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In B. Dancygier, W. Lu & A. Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 169–190). Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, W., Verhagen, A. & Su, I.
(2018) A Multiple-Parallel-Text approach for viewpoint research across languages: The case of demonstratives in English and Chinese. In S. Csábi (ed.), Expressive Minds and Artistic Creations, (pp. 131–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu, W., Shurma, S. & Kemmer, S.
(2020) Delivering the unconventional across languages: A Cognitive Grammar analysis of nonce words in “Jabberwocky” and its Ukrainian renditions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1), 244–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, W.
(2018) A Cognitive Grammar approach to leadership rhetoric: Schemata and categories in “I Have a Dream”. In C. Haase & A. Schröder (eds.), Analogy, copy, and representation: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 47–55). Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag.Google Scholar
(2019) Time, tense and viewpoint shift across languages: A Multiple-Parallel-Text approach to “tense shifting” in a tenseless language. Cognitive Linguistics 30(2), 377–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lü, S. 呂叔湘
(1979) Hanyu yufa fenxi wenti 漢語語法分析問題 [Analysis of issues in Mandarin grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press 商務印書館.Google Scholar
Lukl, J.
This issue). The role of emphatic italics in the information structure of a prose text as seen from the point of view of functional sentence perspective and the prosody of written language. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7(2).
Marlow, J. E.
(1994) Charles Dickens: The uses of time. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, G. S.
(2008) Phonology: A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Culpeper, J.
(2002) Cognitive stylistics. Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shyu, S.
(2016) Information structure. In C. Huang & D. Shi (eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese (pp. 518–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D.
(1995) Subjective meanings and the history of inversions in English. In D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and subjectivisation (pp. 129–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P.
(2002) Cognitive poetics. An introduction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Su, L. I.
(2002) Why a construction – That is the question! Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 28(2), 27–42.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2005) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsur, R.
(1992) Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A.
(2005) Constructions of intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Construal and stylistics – within a language, across contexts, across languages. In Stylistics across Disciplines (Conference Proceedings, CD-ROM). Leiden.Google Scholar

Research materials used

Dickens, C.
(2010) Great expectations. Mineola; New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
(1990) Yuǎndà qiánchéng 远大前程 [Great expectations, Wáng Kēyī 王科一 Trans.]. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House 上海译文出版社.Google Scholar
(2001) Yuǎndà qiánchéng 远大前程 [Great expectations, Hú Zégang 胡泽刚 Trans.]. Haikou: Nánfang Publishing 南方出版社.Google Scholar
(2001) Yuǎndà qiánchéng 远大前程 [Great expectations, Luó Zhìyě 罗志野 Trans.]. Nanjing: Yilin Press 译林出版社.Google Scholar
(2004) Yuǎndà qiánchéng 远大前程 [Great expectations, Yè Zūn 叶尊 Trans.]. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House 人民文学出版社.Google Scholar
(2012) Yuǎndà qiánchéng 远大前程 [Great expectations, Xú Pàn 徐畔 Trans.]. Harbin: North China Literature and Art Publishing House 北方文艺出版社.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Knotková, Magdaléna & Wei-lun Lu
2020. Rendering, generalization and variation. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.