Article published in:
Cognitive Linguistic Aspects of Information Structure and Flow
Edited by Wei-lun Lu and Jirí Lukl
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2] 2020
► pp. 416439
References

References

Bresnan, Joan
(eds.) (1982) The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
(2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of construction. In Thomas Hoffmann and Grameme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
(1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publication.Google Scholar
Croft, William
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul, and O’Connor, Mary C.
(1988) Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone. Language 64(3), 501–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna
(2014) Ditransitives in British English dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
(1989) A Unified Account of the Semantics of the Ditransitive. Berkeley Linguistic Society 15, 79–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) The Inherent Semantics of Argument Structure: The Case of the English Ditransitive Construction. Cognitive Linguistics 3, 37–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Relationships between verb and construction. In Marjolijn Verspoor and Eve Sweetser (eds.), Lexicon and grammar (pp. 383–398). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 383–98.Google Scholar
(2003) Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Journal of Foreign Languages, 3, 1–11.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon
(1989) The theory of functional grammar 1: The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Huang, James, Audrey Li, and Yafei Li
(2007) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A.
(1990) English word grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1988) Usage-Based Model. in Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–161). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) A Dynamic Usage-based Model. In Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2005) Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical and less So. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 101–159). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Constructions and constructional meaning. In Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 225–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R.
(1988) On the doubt object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–392.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
(1981) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Yuming
(1996) Lingshu guanxi yu shuangbinju fenxi [Genitive relation and the analysis of the ditransitive construction]. Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu [Language teaching and research], 3, 62–73.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming
(2002) Zaitan ‘Chi-Le Ta San Ge Pingguo’ Yilei Jiegou de Xingzhi [A Double-Object Analysis of the Mandarin Pattern of ‘Chi Le Ta San Ge Pingguo’]. Zhongguo Yuwen 4, 317–25.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath, and Bernard Comrie
(2010) Studies in ditransitive constructions. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
(2005) English ditransitive verbs: Aspects of theory, description and a usage-based model. Amsterdam: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. and Paul M. Postal
(1983) Toward a universal characterization of passivization. In David M. Perlmutter (eds.), Studies in relation gramma I (pp. 3–19). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl, and Ivan A. Sag
(1993) Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago and Stanford: University of Chicago Press and the Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan. A., Tom Wasow, and Emily Bender
(2003) Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language Information Publications.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi
2004Han Ying shuangbin jiegou chabie de gainianhua yuanyin [The motivation of conceptualization for the differences of double-object construction between Chinese and English]. Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu [Foreign Language Teaching and Research] 36(2), 83–89.Google Scholar
2016Hanyu yufa yanhuashi [The evolution of Chinese grammar]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Education Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Jing and Yuzhi Shi
2009Zhiyue Hanyu yufa jiegou xuanze de yinsu [Factors in determining the selection of constructions]. Language Teaching and Research 6. 17–24.Google Scholar
Xu, Jie
(2004) Yuyishang de Tongzhi Guanxi yu Jufashang de Shuangbinyu Jushi [The semantic relationship of co-reference and the syntactic construction of double objects]. Zhongguo Yuwen 4, 302–313.Google Scholar
Yang, Bojun, and He Leshi
(1992) Guhanyu yufa jiqi fazhan [The grammar of Classical Chinese and its development]. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yang, Chengkai
(1996) Hanyu yufa lilun yanjiu [Studies in Chinese grammar theory]. Shenyang: Liaoning Education Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bojiang
(2006) Guanyu ‘Suoqu Lei Shuangbinyu’ [On the so-called ‘take’ type double object]. Yuyanxue Luncong, 33, 298–312.Google Scholar
Zhang, Daozhen
(2002) A dictionary of current English usage. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Guoxian
(2001) Zhiyue Duoshi Chengfen Juwei Shixian de Yuyi Yinsu [The Semantic Constraints on the Syntactic Mapping of the ‘Deprived’ Constituent]. Zhongguo Yuwen 6, 508–518.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ning
(1998) The interactions between construction meaning and lexical meaning. Linguistics 36(5), 957–980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Dexi
(1982) Yufa jiangyi [Lecture notes on grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar