Our metaphorical minds
Language as cultural manifestations
Aside from metaphor being an important language device reflecting human cognition, it also provides a window into the
understanding of culture (
Kövecsec 2019). Language is a function of culture because it is a form
of the verbal and nonverbal systems by which a group member can communicate with another member. Language connects people of the same
cultural identity because it functions as a common bond between people who have the same linguistic heritage. As argued in
Verhagen (2008), values of one’s understanding of the world he lives in may in turn be influenced by
the conceptual metaphors he unconsciously holds to visualize his world. Verhagen has provided a valuable standpoint, yet it is
western-centered and European-oriented. Through metaphors identified in Chinese in proverbs, food, marriage, and time expressions, this
paper intends to address the following questions: Does conceptual metaphors reflect any specific Chinese mode of thinking? Does
such conceptualization give a taste of Chinese culture? What kind(s) of theoretical and pragmatic implications can be derived from our line
of investigation? It is thus hoped that this paper may provide empirical evidence with reference to mappings between thought and language,
which in turn, may serve as a way to explore culture.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some basic concepts and methodology
- 2.1Theoretical background
- 2.1.1Reframing
- 2.1.2Mental spaces and conceptual blending
- 2.2Methodology
- 2.2.1A cognitive approach
- 2.2.2Data
- 3.Metaphors and conceptualization
- 3.1Marriage
- 3.2Food
- 3.3Time
- 3.3.1Time and space
- 3.3.2
time is water
- 4.Towards a cultural model
- 4.1Language and culture
- 4.2Proverbs: A window to culture
- 5.Conclusion
-
References
References (40)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen. (1999). Conceptual metaphors: From mapping principles to knowledge representation. Manuscript.
Charteris-Black, Johnathan. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
Chiang, Wen-yu & Sheng-hsiu Chiu. (2007). The conceptualization of STATE: A comparative study of metaphors in the R.O.C. (Taiwan) and U.S. Constitutions. Concentric, 33(1), 19–46.
Dong, Wei-guang. (2004). The Chinese conceptualization of time revisited. Contemporary Linguistics, 6(2), 110–115.
Fang, Thome H. (1957). The Chinese view of life. Hong Kong: The Union Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental space: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mapping in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. & Mark Turner. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 221, 133–187.
Fauconnier, G. & Mark Turner. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fillmore, Charles. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–138). Seoul: Hanshin.
Frake, G. (1977). Playing frames can be dangerous. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 11, 1–7.
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). Figurative thought and figurative language. In Gernsbacker, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
Goodenough, W. (1957). Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In Gavin (Ed.), Report of the 7th Round Table meeting on linguistics and language study (pp. 167–173). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.
Graesser, A., Long, D., & Mio, J. (1989). What are the cognitive and conceptual components of humorous texts? Poetics, 181, 143–164.
Huang, Chun-chieh & Zurcher, Erik. (1995). Cultural notions of Space and Time in China. In Chun-chieh Huang & Erik Zurcher (Eds.), Time and space in Chinese culture (pp. 3–16). Leiden, New York: Brill.
Hutchins, E. (1980). Culture and inference: A Trobriand case study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kay, Paul. (1983). Language competence and folk theories of language: Two English hedges. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 128–137.
Keesing, R. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 73–97.
Kovecses, Zoltan. (2019). Some consequences of a multi-level view of metaphor. In Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp. 19–33). Mouton.
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 39–74.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, George. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Liu, Shu-hsien. (2006). On the formation of a philosophy of time and history through the Yijing
. In Chun-chieh Huang & John B. Henderson (Eds.), Notions of time in Chinese historical thinking (pp. 75–94). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
Mieder, W. (1985). A proverb is a short sentence of wisdom. Proverbium 21, 109–143.
Pillio, H., Barlow, J., Fine, H. & Pollio, M. (1977). Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Su, Lily I-wen. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 589–613.
Sweetser, E. (1992). English metaphors for language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 131, 705–724.
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. New York: Cornell University Press.
Verhagen, Frans C. (2008). Worldviews and metaphors in the human-nature relationship: An ecolinguistic exploration through the ages. Language and Ecology, 2(3), 1–19.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.