Cover not available
Article published In:
Developments in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies
Edited by Kairong Xiao and Sandra L. Halverson
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8:2] 2021
► pp. 251–276
Situated approaches to cognition in translation and interpreting

Joint creative process in translation

Socially distributed cognition in two production contexts

ORCID logo | Tampere University
ORCID logo | Tampere University

In this article, we explore socially distributed cognition (SDC) as a theoretical model of translation and investigate it empirically as an aspect of the collaborative and creative translation workflow. With the aim of developing a better understanding of SDC and collaborative workflows in translation, we analyzed two different settings where more than one person works on a translation: commercial specialized translation (CST) services, and the production of audio descriptions (AD) as teamwork between blind and sighted describers. The analysis focuses on how the process of co-creation unfolds in the communication that binds together the systems of SDC. While the process of co-creation was strikingly similar in the two different translation contexts, the differences were bound to channels of communication (with or without direct contact between participants), and the draft translation was identified as a central artifact that carries much of the communication when the participants do not work in the same space. With an emphasis on socially distributed cognition, our study provides a framework for both the cognitive and social aspects of translation and develops the understanding of collaborative translation processes. It also contributes to the development of translation practices by helping translation operators and trainers make choices between alternative workflows.

Keywords: socially distributed cognition, co-creation, audio description, commercial specialized translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background and previous studies
    • 2.1Distributed cognition
    • 2.2Distributed cognition in translation studies
    • 2.3Translation as distributed creativity
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Results: Socially distributed cognition in translation editing
    • 4.1A system of socially distributed cognition: Channels and participants
    • 4.2Co-creation: Distributed divergence and convergence in action
  • 5.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00078.kor
References
Abdallah, K.
(2014) The interface between Bourdieu’s Habitus and Latour’s Agency: The work trajectories of two Finnish translators. In G. M. Vorderobermeier (Ed.), Remapping habitus in translation studies (pp. 111–132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M.
(2018) Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. New York/Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer-Hohenwarter, G., & Kussmaul, P.
(2021) Translation, creativity and cognition. In F. Alves & A. L. Jakobsen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation and cognition. (pp. 310–325). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruin, L. de, Gallagher, S., & Newen, A.
(2018) The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzelin, H.
(2005) Unexpected allies: How Latour’s network theory could complement Bourdieusian analyses in translation studies. The Translator, 11(2), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D.
(1998) The extended mind. Analysis, 581, 7–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cordingley, A. & Manning, C. F.
(Eds.) (2016) Collaborative translation: From the Renaissance to the digital age. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dam-Jensen, H., & Heine, C.
(2013) Writing and translation process research: Bridging the gap. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 89–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dam-Jensen, H., Heine, C., & Schrijver, I.
(2019) The nature of text production – similarities and differences between writing and translation. Across Languages and Cultures, 20(2), 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dragsted, B.
(2006) Computer-aided translation as a distributed cognitive task. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englund Dimitrova, B., & Ehrensberger-Dow, M.
(2018) Cognitive space: Exploring the situational interface. In M. Ehrensberger-Dow and B. Englund Dimitrova (Eds.), Exploring the situational interface of translation and cognition (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun
(2013) The socially extended mind. Cognitive Systems Research 25–261, 4–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giere, R. N., & Moffatt, B.
(2003) Distributed cognition. Social Studies of Science, 33(2), 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glӑveanu, V. P.
(2014) Distributed Creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P.
(1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 444–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirvonen, M.
in preparation). Shared cognition in translation. Information processing and knowledge production as interactive accomplishments.
Hirvonen, M., & Tiittula, L.
(2018) How are translations created? Analysis of multimodal interaction as a methodology to study a team translation process. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 171, 157–173.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E.
(1991) The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995a) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science 191, 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, A. L.
(1994) Starting from the (Other) End: Integrating translation and text production. In C. Dollerup & A. Lindegaard (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 2: Insights, aims, visions (pp. 143–150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, A. L., & Alves, F.
(2021) Introduction. In F. Alves & A. L. Jakobsen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 1–21). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Glăveanu, V. P.
(2019) A review of creativity theories: What questions are we trying to answer? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity, 2nd edition (pp. 27–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiraly, D.
(2003) From instruction to collaborative construction: A passing fad or the promise of a paradigm shift in translator education. B. Baer & G. Koby (Eds.), Beyond the ivory tower: Rethinking translation pedagogy (pp. 3–27). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, A.
(2021) From language check to creative editing: Exploring variation in revision stage of the LSP workflow. M. Koponen, B. Mossop, G. Scocchera & I. S. Robert (Eds.), Translation revision and post-editing: Industry practices and cognitive processes (pp. 131–147). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koskinen, K., & Kinnunen, T.
(2010) Introduction. In T. Kinnunen & K. Koskinen (Eds.), Translators’ agency (pp. 4–10). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, D., Zhang, C., & He, Y.
(2015) Project-based learning in teaching translation: students’ perceptions. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 9(1), 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyre, H.
(2018) Socially extended cognition and shared intentionality. Frontiers in Psychology, 91:831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, L.
(2010) Introduction to the special issue “Extended mind”. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(4), 311–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeese, M., Salas, E., & Endsley, M. R.
(Eds.) (2020) Foundations and theoretical perspectives of distributed team cognition. Abingdon: CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, C. D.
(2018) Re-thinking translation quality: Revision in the digital age. Target, 30(2), 310–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, R.
(2010) On paradigms and cognitive translatology. In E. Angelone, G. M. Shreve (Eds.), Translation and cognition (pp. 169–187). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Looking toward the future of cognitive translation studies. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 555–572). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Martín, R., & Rojo López, A. M.
(2018) Meaning. In S. Harding & O. Carbonell Cortés (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation and culture (pp. 61–78). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurminen, M.
(2020) Raw machine translation use by patent professionals: A case of distributed cognition. Translation, Cognition & Behavior, 3(1), 100–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, M.
(1999) The application of individually and socially distributed cognition in workplace studies: Two peas in a pod? Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena, Italy, 87–92.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B.
(1991) Shared cognition: thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Translation process research as interaction research: From mental to socio-cognitive processes. In R. Muñoz Martín (Ed.), Minding translation (Special issue No. 1 of MonTI), 331–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, H., & Rogl, R.
(2021) Translation and situated, embodied, distributed, embedded and extended cognition. In F. Alves & A. L. Jakobsen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 478–499). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Risku, H., Rogl, R., & Milosevic, J.
(2017) Translation practice in the field: Current research on socio-cognitive processes. Translation Spaces, 6(1), 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Risku, H., & Windhager, F.
(2013) Extended translation: A sociocognitive research agenda. Target, 25(1), 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, A.
(2017) The role of creativity. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The handbook of translation and cognition (pp. 350–368). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rupert, R.
(2004) Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 1011, 389–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S.
(2009) Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theiner, G., Allen, C., & Goldstone, R. L.
(2010) Recognizing group cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(4), 378–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, K.
(2001) Unpacking creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.
(1997) The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar